lowing
Banned
+1,662|7080|USA
I posted this in another thread then decided it might be worth its own.


We could have brought the Muslim world to its knees as it appears they deserved.


http://stosstruppen39-45.tripod.com/id10.html

http://christianactionforisrael.org/ant … bnazi.html

So it would seem that the Muslim hatred of the Jews reaches farther out than the establishment of Israel in 1947( 2 years after WW2), as we are lead to believe. It is apparent that down right intolerance of others and their beliefs is at the root of all this non-sense.  The Muslim world actually allied with Hitler to wipe out the Jews. So much for Israel being the reason for this hatred, it is the Jews that are hated, and persecuted.

Last edited by lowing (2007-03-31 19:38:28)

ATG
Banned
+5,233|6958|Global Command
I've been trying to point this out since I registered here.
Nice find.    +1


Low post to view ratio because of painful truth factor.

Last edited by ATG (2007-03-31 19:49:33)

lowing
Banned
+1,662|7080|USA

ATG wrote:

I've been trying to point this out since I registered here.
Nice find.    +1


Low post to view ratio because of painful truth factor.
LOL, yeah somehow, I doubt this thread will be getting much "love" or attention by the Pro- Muslim  or anti-Israel crowd. I hope, of course, I am wrong.
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|7104|Canberra, AUS
I don't paticularly like your sources. Both are pro-Zionist, anti-Muslim sites - and therefore I find it hard to believe this information to be accurate.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
Ajax_the_Great1
Dropped on request
+206|7075
Religion should have nothing to do with politics. Unfortunately for the middle east, religion is politics.
Commie Killer
Member
+192|6816

Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:

Religion should have nothing to do with politics. Unfortunately for the middle east, religion is politics.
The rest of the world grew up, no one else thinks that way anymore and well, hell, I feel a lot safer now having nukes now then if people had nukes 500 years ago, now people are driven by the conscience and dont usually fall back onto the religion and manipulate it in a sort of way that they can make anything morally right in their own mind. Right now the Mid East is the only place that is still living centuries ago, communist countries are living about 100 years or so, the hard core communists still believe in and pretty much want to force their system upon everyone else, kinda like the religious fanatics do.
Reciprocity
Member
+721|7010|the dank(super) side of Oregon
I'm not trying to instigate anything but I'm just curious,  a guy I work with says his favorite country is Israel becuase that is where Armageddon begins, Jesus comes back carrying a sword and all the non-christians burn for eternity, whatever, he also thinks Harry Potter is the work of Satan.  Is that why you guys love Israel so much?  Just wondering?
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6958|Global Command

Reciprocity wrote:

I'm not trying to instigate anything but I'm just curious,  a guy I work with says his favorite country is Israel becuase that is where Armageddon begins, Jesus comes back carrying a sword and all the non-christians burn for eternity, whatever, he also thinks Harry Potter is the work of Satan.  Is that why you guys love Israel so much?  Just wondering?
I'm agnostic.

Historically speaking imo, Israel has been judged too harshly and the surrounding Arab states have done great harm to the Pallestinians.

Thats all I'm saying.
norge
J-10 and a coke please
+18|6899
Just remember, the rapture must happen before the generation during the establishment of the jewish state (israel) die.
Reciprocity
Member
+721|7010|the dank(super) side of Oregon

norge wrote:

Just remember, the rapture must happen before the generation during the establishment of the jewish state (israel) die.
neat
usmarine2007
Banned
+374|6796|Columbus, Ohio

ATG wrote:

Low post to view ratio because of painful truth factor.
Bingo
krazed
Admiral of the Bathtub
+619|7209|Great Brown North

Reciprocity wrote:

I'm not trying to instigate anything but I'm just curious,  a guy I work with says his favorite country is Israel becuase that is where Armageddon begins, Jesus comes back carrying a sword and all the non-christians burn for eternity, whatever, he also thinks Harry Potter is the work of Satan.  Is that why you guys love Israel so much?  Just wondering?
harry potter is the work of satan? thats a new one
التعريفات
Squiggles
+102|6797|Cali
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|7104|Canberra, AUS
Thanks, but...

I have to go source-by-source.

Source 1, themiddleeastnow.com: Clearly pro-Israel. Looking on the main page of the site, they have cherry picked articles about 'the middle east', mostly to do with israel and iran. More worrying is the comments - clearly, this is not a neutral site. Some examples:


wow! olmert said something smart! the right of return is based on the ficticious claims that 1) the zionists expelled the Arabs from their homes in 1947-48 and 2) Israel was responsible for the refugee problem. The majority of Palestinians left Israel WILLINGLY either to escape an upcoming war between the Zionists and the Arab armies, or on the order of the Arab leaders. The Arabs were encouraging Israel's Arab population to leave so that no Arabs would be killed during the invasion. The Israeli Arabs were psomised that the Zionists would be defeated and that they would return to their homes as victors. The rest his history. The Arab leaders are responsible for the refugee problem and THEY must take responsiblity for it, not Israel.

The right of return is just another way for calling for Israel's destruction. If there is one thing Olmert is doing right, it is that he is protecting his country by rejecting the right of return

---

yet no one complains about our aid to the Palestinians

---

why should Israel keep giving back land when that land keeps being used for terrorism?
Source 2: Seems OK, but doens't actually prove much.

Source 3: Look on the main page. A conservative site - not great for its credibility. More worrying is the list of keywords there.

ISLAMICFASCISM? ISLAMICHATRED? ISLAMOFASCISM? Give me a break.

Source 4: Greek nationalist site... Wha?

Source 5: Yet another pro-Jewist website. Please, please, please find a neutral source, so far it's been, what, 1/7?

A quote from the frontpage of the site:


Our enemies are the same. Intolerance, racism, Nazis and Islam fundamentalists are our common enemy. Mass graves where Jews and Serbs are buried together stretch all across ex-Yugoslavia and are the proof of our common suffering and our eternal bond.

It is our intention to warn all people of good will about the undying danger of Nazism and Islam fanaticism.
You couldn't make a better introduction if you made the site purely to claim a nazi-islam link.

Source 7: Same as source 2. I hate those popups.

Source 8: Seems OK, including the book. that's 2/10.

Source 9: Wow. Look at the links under 'Islam' at the bottom. "OH NOES MUSLIMS IMMIGRATION!" is all I can see. Horrible source.

Source 10: Actually is an article from THE JERUSALEM POST. Problems should be plain.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7080|USA
Spark, your defense is exactly what I expected. Since there really isn't anything else you CAN say in about it.

I wanna hear again how All the Muslims want is their land back and once Israel is eliminated there will be peace in the middle east, and the middle east violence stems from the creation of Israel.

I think these articles clearly show intolerance and persecution by the Muslims toward the Jews, and Israel has nothing to do with it.

Also, if all of these sources are inaccurate, wrong, lying, whatever, surely you can show some links challenging these claims.

I find it interesting that the only argument you mount toward the OP is the sources. I am left to assume if given a source you can't deny, you would be forced to agree with the OP.



If ya can't trust your Wikipedia, who can ya trust??  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Amin_al-Husayni
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|7104|Canberra, AUS

lowing wrote:

Spark, your defense is exactly what I expected. Since there really isn't anything else you CAN say in about it.

I wanna hear again how All the Muslims want is their land back and once Israel is eliminated there will be peace in the middle east, and the middle east violence stems from the creation of Israel.

I think these articles clearly show intolerance and persecution by the Muslims toward the Jews, and Israel has nothing to do with it.

Also, if all of these sources are inaccurate, wrong, lying, whatever, surely you can show some links challenging these claims.

I find it interesting that the only argument you mount toward the OP is the sources. I am left to assume if given a source you can't deny, you would be forced to agree with the OP.



If ya can't trust your Wikipedia, who can ya trust??  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Amin_al-Husayni
Thankyou! A decent source, that's all I wanted.

It's very interesting, but you can't generalise. You can find anti-Semites on every continent (I'm sure there's one on Antarctica, if you looked hard enough), so...
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7080|USA

Spark wrote:

lowing wrote:

Spark, your defense is exactly what I expected. Since there really isn't anything else you CAN say in about it.

I wanna hear again how All the Muslims want is their land back and once Israel is eliminated there will be peace in the middle east, and the middle east violence stems from the creation of Israel.

I think these articles clearly show intolerance and persecution by the Muslims toward the Jews, and Israel has nothing to do with it.

Also, if all of these sources are inaccurate, wrong, lying, whatever, surely you can show some links challenging these claims.

I find it interesting that the only argument you mount toward the OP is the sources. I am left to assume if given a source you can't deny, you would be forced to agree with the OP.



If ya can't trust your Wikipedia, who can ya trust??  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Amin_al-Husayni
Thankyou! A decent source, that's all I wanted.

It's very interesting, but you can't generalise. You can find anti-Semites on every continent (I'm sure there's one on Antarctica, if you looked hard enough), so...
Ok, well baby steps I guess, now that we have settled on a source, we can continue.

I don't think the Holocaust and Arabs allying with the Nazis to wipe out the Jews is a "generalization". My argument is, the Muslims were trying to eliminate the Jews long before the creation of Israel, and that the strife in the middle east is over the intolerance of Jews by the Muslims.. Persecuted so harshly that the Muslims collaborated with the Nazis to exterminate them. All I am saying is, lets re-examine who is the "religion of peace" again? Who are the instigators in the ME again?

I feel this is proof that there can no longer be questions about the tolerance, and the peaceful nature, of the Muslim religion. I also think this proves just who the real aggressors are in all of this, and who is on the defensive. The destruction of the Jewish religion and/or race is the goal of the Muslim world not just the destruction of Israel. This proves it.


Lastly, how can you say you can find anti-Semites throughout the world, given the holocaust and the persecution of the Jews along with these articles, and still maintain that the Jews are the terrorists and the aggressors, that it is the Muslims who are victimized?
m3thod
All kiiiiiiiiinds of gainz
+2,197|7100|UK

lowing wrote:

Spark, your defense is exactly what I expected. Since there really isn't anything else you CAN say in about it.

I wanna hear again how All the Muslims want is their land back and once Israel is eliminated there will be peace in the middle east, and the middle east violence stems from the creation of Israel.

I think these articles clearly show intolerance and persecution by the Muslims toward the Jews, and Israel has nothing to do with it.

Also, if all of these sources are inaccurate, wrong, lying, whatever, surely you can show some links challenging these claims.

I find it interesting that the only argument you mount toward the OP is the sources. I am left to assume if given a source you can't deny, you would be forced to agree with the OP.



If ya can't trust your Wikipedia, who can ya trust??  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Amin_al-Husayni
if you trust wikipedia you deserve to be shot.
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7080|USA

m3thod wrote:

lowing wrote:

Spark, your defense is exactly what I expected. Since there really isn't anything else you CAN say in about it.

I wanna hear again how All the Muslims want is their land back and once Israel is eliminated there will be peace in the middle east, and the middle east violence stems from the creation of Israel.

I think these articles clearly show intolerance and persecution by the Muslims toward the Jews, and Israel has nothing to do with it.

Also, if all of these sources are inaccurate, wrong, lying, whatever, surely you can show some links challenging these claims.

I find it interesting that the only argument you mount toward the OP is the sources. I am left to assume if given a source you can't deny, you would be forced to agree with the OP.



If ya can't trust your Wikipedia, who can ya trust??  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Amin_al-Husayni
if you trust wikipedia you deserve to be shot.
By nature of being polarized on this or ANY issue, bias towards one view point is inescapable. So, how about you argue against the points of the OP instead? Provide your "biased" sources as proof this did not happen if you wish.
JahManRed
wank
+646|7057|IRELAND

The Soviet Muslims were living under a Soviet Stalinist Communist regime. They choose what they thought to be the lesser of 2 evils at the time for the survival of their religion and freedom to practice their beliefs.
Your link to the modern Jihad is tedious.
"The German courting of the Soviet Muslims was part of Hitler's lunatic schemes for bringing Turkey into his side and for advancing to control the oil fields in Middle East and Baku."
http://stosstruppen39-45.tripod.com/id10.html
Kinda like the USA's courting of notorious human rights abusers Saudi Arabia and Saddam for their oil.

The British indicated their intent to carve a Jewish state out of Palestine as early as 1917 through the Balfour Declaration:
"The first is the Balfour Declaration of 1917: An official letter from the British Foreign Office headed by Arthur Balfour, the UK's Foreign Secretary (from December 1916 to October 1919), to Lord Rothschild, who was seen as a representative of the Jewish people. The letter stated that the British government "view[ed] with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country".""
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balfour_Declaration

The Muslims knew Britain's intention to allow Israel to create its own state and shift a million Muslims of their lands. When your peoples lands, history and culture is under threat from the largest super power of the time, you cast your eyes around for friends. "Is my enemy's enemy's my friend?" Britain had made it clear that they were going to allow creation of Israel and Mohammad Amin al-Husayni foresaw a the oppression which continues to this day. He was a nationalist and his first priority was the survival of his country.
Ninja_Kid2002
Member
+119|6696|Floodsville, TN, (UK really)

Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:

Religion should have nothing to do with politics. Unfortunately for the middle east, religion is politics.
I once tried to blame religion for wars in a conversation and got put rightly in my place. Men blame religion for wars, but it's just a guize, like anti-terror for oil.
Wars are fought for money, land and power, but so that the leaders can appear trust-worthy, they claim religious reasons.

Take the crusades, was that all about Christianity, I doubt it, it was about land, and power. Whoever held Jarusalem, held the power.
stef10
Member
+173|6911|Denmark
They hate Jews and Christians because in the quran it says that they are the enemies of muslims.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7080|USA

JahManRed wrote:

The Soviet Muslims were living under a Soviet Stalinist Communist regime. They choose what they thought to be the lesser of 2 evils at the time for the survival of their religion and freedom to practice their beliefs.
Your link to the modern Jihad is tedious.
"The German courting of the Soviet Muslims was part of Hitler's lunatic schemes for bringing Turkey into his side and for advancing to control the oil fields in Middle East and Baku."
http://stosstruppen39-45.tripod.com/id10.html
Kinda like the USA's courting of notorious human rights abusers Saudi Arabia and Saddam for their oil.

The British indicated their intent to carve a Jewish state out of Palestine as early as 1917 through the Balfour Declaration:
"The first is the Balfour Declaration of 1917: An official letter from the British Foreign Office headed by Arthur Balfour, the UK's Foreign Secretary (from December 1916 to October 1919), to Lord Rothschild, who was seen as a representative of the Jewish people. The letter stated that the British government "view[ed] with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country".""
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balfour_Declaration

The Muslims knew Britain's intention to allow Israel to create its own state and shift a million Muslims of their lands. When your peoples lands, history and culture is under threat from the largest super power of the time, you cast your eyes around for friends. "Is my enemy's enemy's my friend?" Britain had made it clear that they were going to allow creation of Israel and Mohammad Amin al-Husayni foresaw a the oppression which continues to this day. He was a nationalist and his first priority was the survival of his country.
excellent post:

I guess, protecting your lands, history, and culture from aggression is only reserved for non-Jews. If a Jew does it, it is terrorism. Are you saying that Jews have NO historical presence, and no culture associated with the Middle East?

So if the Muslims were afraid of British intentions, why not "eliminate" the British as a race?? Why eliminate the people the British fought for?

Are you saying that the genocide of the Jews by the Muslims and Nazis was merely a rational pre-emptive measure to make sure Israel is never established. That intolerance for the Jews had nothing to do with it?? Do you honestly believe this??
tahadar
Sniper!!
+183|7167|Pakistan/England

stef10 wrote:

They hate Jews and Christians because in the quran it says that they are the enemies of muslims.
you read the Quraan when?

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard