BF2S Forums The Next Battlefield; What I would like to see

GR34 wrote:

I can sum up what the next battlefield should be in one word: Korea (never has a game taken place in the Korean war)

I wonder why? Ah yes, thats why. A war based on Korea, wouldnt sell. At all

Last edited by fatherted13 (2007-02-10 10:14:12)

A high learning curve.

ShawN_ wrote:

And btw i think we need something totally new,, not a mix of all BF's

Well, the modern and future aspects could and should be reworked.  It is not really a mix, but a combat system that would support all three genres.  After all, 2142 is built on most of the same things as BF2, and it would not be difficult at all to build WW2 items in instead.  Use of a single combat model to provide combat in three different genres.  Each genre to have its own form and style of fighting, changing as the situations and available technologies change.

I like the genre cross-over just to have some fun with the idea, and to give a greater number of maps to choose from.

Can't do too many changes to the WW2 aspect, of course.  But you could move 'modern' (BF2) to VERY modern/ near future.  New weapons, etc.  And the future, ala BF2142... that is where you could really play and let go.

Plus,  it would pull back in the people who stuck with BF 1942, not to mention BF2 and 2142.  More people means more interesting fights, more servers with unique options, more play variety to keep things fresh.

But, of course, they absolutely MUST have a new graphics engine and some better bells and whistles.

blademaster wrote:

some_random_panda wrote:

They should start anew.

Please, no more stuffed-up, hitbox lacking, buggy games.


EDIT:  But Physics and Ragdolls would be nice...

agree kind of like Crysis game

Can you imagine the computer and server to handle 32+ players with Crysis like graphics?  I'm not made of money, perhaps you are.

Learning a game might not take that long, if you want to master a game you might have to put your life in it.

I hope first person shooters will have realistic gore as in real war. Broken exposed bones, head blown to bits, guts spewing out, blood everywhere, shrapnel embedded in your skin, limbs all over the ground, bodies everywhere, damaged buildings when shot at, tanks can smash through stuff, cant jump out of helos, jets have ejection seats, animation getting in and out of a vehicle, soldiers have attributes ie run faster, faster reload times, more efficient machine handling. When using voip the enemy can hear you if you speak too loud.

Battlefield: Stone Age

Godzilla.

yea, i was gonna say Battlefield BC!!!

i had hoped it would be Battlefield 1943... a return to the roots but the WW2 theme is beyond abused already.

If another one comes out, I probably won't get it.

Next Battlefield will probly be a DX10 game so it should be good, but we just have to wait and see..

-=]NS[=-Eagle wrote:

Titan mode would be so cool in BF2 if they used a warship such as a destroyer.  It would be kind of like iron gator except you would have to blow up the engine rooms or something.  Also you could use the ship's main armaments such as the artillery or the tomahawk cruise missiles... just a thought.

Agreed. I thought about that.  maybe have a couple 5" guns to use as distant arty.  But the Titan shield is what keeps Titan mode from being a complete camp fest.  They have to spnd part of the round fighting it out.  Maybe in an island complex map, and only a couple flags have boats to get to the carrier.  I am sure it is possible, and I am sure it would rock.