Baghdad offensive set to begin

2007-02-04 19:18:02

#1

ATG: Banned; +5,233|6955|Global Command

Why bother again?

http://today.reuters.com/news/articlene … amp;rpc=22

http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/16616389.htm

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - A U.S.-Iraqi campaign to stabilize Baghdad will begin soon and the offensive against militants will be on a scale never seen during four years of war, American officers said on Sunday.

These people don't want us there and I don't want my fellow citizens dying for them anyway.

Lets pull back, and nuke them ( Islam ) if they ever attack us again ( ala 9-11 ).

Last edited by ATG (2007-02-04 19:20:25)

2007-02-04 19:20:53

#2

usmarine2007: Banned; +374|6793|Columbus, Ohio

Oh great. Street to street fighting. GG Pentagon.

2007-02-04 19:24:24

#3

Jbrar: rawr; +86|6968|Winterpeg, Canada

I'm always forgetting that it's been so long. Like 4 years, damn. When this all started, I was thinking "hey, it's just a small conflict, probably gonna be forgotten by most in 10-15 years from now".

2007-02-04 19:36:11

#4

Skorpy-chan: Member; +127|6771|Twyford, UK

They're announcing this on CNN.

What the hell? Seriously, do they not think the insurgents don't watch TV? They'll be long gone by the time they get there.

2007-02-04 19:44:31

#5

ATG: Banned; +5,233|6955|Global Command

Not if the city is sealed.

2007-02-04 19:50:52

#6

yuckfou09: hide your terrorists ^,^; +94|7103|Ft. Drum, NY

yeah, but take into consideration all the networks of tunnels and secret ways for the scum to flee that shit hole.

2007-02-04 19:51:50

#7

BN: smells like wee wee; +159|7194

ATG wrote:
Lets pull back, and nuke them ( Islam ) if they ever attack us again ( ala 9-11 ).

the majority of 911 hijackers where saudi and the extext of Israel's involvement is classified.

Maybe u should be bombing elsewhere...

2007-02-04 19:53:39

#8

ATG: Banned; +5,233|6955|Global Command

BN wrote:
ATG wrote:
Lets pull back, and nuke them ( Islam ) if they ever attack us again ( ala 9-11 ).
the majority of 911 hijackers where saudi and the extext of Israel's involvement is classified.

Maybe u should be bombing elsewhere...

You prove Israel had a hand in 9-11 & I'll advocate bombing Israel.

2007-02-04 20:37:02

#9

Reciprocity: Member; +721|7007|the dank(super) side of Oregon

ATG wrote:
Lets pull back, and nuke them ( Islam ) if they ever attack us again ( ala 9-11 ).

At least you have a plan. It's certainly not more of the same.

2007-02-04 20:40:09

#10

G3|Genius: Pope of BF2s; +355|7052|Sea to globally-cooled sea

the status quo is unacceptable. Either we step it up or step down.

We need to step it up. Flex our muscles. I feel that our military is just "there" but not flexing. I want to see some ass kicking.

I'm a proponent.

2007-02-04 20:41:45

#11

Parker: isteal; +1,452|6820|The Gem Saloon

foot 2 ass.

2007-02-04 20:48:47

#12

Not: Great success!; +216|7003|Chandler, AZ

This is clearly a Civil War. I don't understand why we're there. Nothing can convince me that we have any purpose there any more. Let them kill each other into the stone age for all I care, just keep our kids out of the crossfire.

Would it have made any sense for Australia to come in and interfere with OUR Civil War? Of course not. Then again, I don't see any realistic timeline for their war to be over with, but I don't care either.

2007-02-04 21:01:20

#13

BN: smells like wee wee; +159|7194

ATG wrote:
BN wrote:
ATG wrote:
Lets pull back, and nuke them ( Islam ) if they ever attack us again ( ala 9-11 ).
the majority of 911 hijackers where saudi and the extext of Israel's involvement is classified.

Maybe u should be bombing elsewhere...
You prove Israel had a hand in 9-11 & I'll advocate bombing Israel.

You prove Iraq had a hand in 9-11 & I'll advocate bombing Iraq

2007-02-04 21:08:11

#14

ATG: Banned; +5,233|6955|Global Command

BN wrote:
ATG wrote:
BN wrote:

the majority of 911 hijackers where saudi and the extext of Israel's involvement is classified.

Maybe u should be bombing elsewhere...
You prove Israel had a hand in 9-11 & I'll advocate bombing Israel.
You prove Iraq had a hand in 9-11 & I'll advocate bombing Iraq

Just Google it, you'll find links, just as I did for Israel having been involved with 9-11

It is a known fact that Saddam was giving money to the families of suicide bombers that struck within Israel

That is condoning and sanctioning terrorism and good enough reason to hang him.

2007-02-04 21:21:19

#15

BN: smells like wee wee; +159|7194

ATG wrote:
Just Google it, you'll find links, just as I did for Israel having been involved with 9-11

It is a known fact that Saddam was giving money to the families of suicide bombers that struck within Israel

That is condoning and sanctioning terrorism and good enough reason to hang him.

First result

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/ar … Jun16.html

The Sept. 11 commission reported yesterday that it has found no "collaborative relationship" between Iraq and al Qaeda, challenging one of the Bush administration's main justifications for the war in Iraq.
2nd

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3118262.stm

US President George Bush has said there is no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved in the 11 September attacks.

2007-02-04 21:22:08

#16

stryyker: bad touch; +1,682|7146|California

Operation Linebacker III

2007-02-04 21:26:13

#17

ATG: Banned; +5,233|6955|Global Command

BN wrote:
ATG wrote:
Just Google it, you'll find links, just as I did for Israel having been involved with 9-11

It is a known fact that Saddam was giving money to the families of suicide bombers that struck within Israel

That is condoning and sanctioning terrorism and good enough reason to hang him.
First result

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/ar … Jun16.html

The Sept. 11 commission reported yesterday that it has found no "collaborative relationship" between Iraq and al Qaeda, challenging one of the Bush administration's main justifications for the war in Iraq.
2nd

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3118262.stm

US President George Bush has said there is no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved in the 11 September attacks.

I SAID there are other justifiable reasons for what we did.

I'm aware of the lack of direct involvement of Iraq on 9-11.

I don't care.

2007-02-04 21:30:14

#18

Turquoise: O Canada; +1,596|6831|North Carolina

Oh great... more money, more death, different day.

Let's get out of Iraq already.

2007-02-04 21:51:52

#19

gun.KingRat: Member; +12|7116

Not wrote:
This is clearly a Civil War. I don't understand why we're there. Nothing can convince me that we have any purpose there any more. Let them kill each other into the stone age for all I care, just keep our kids out of the crossfire.

Would it have made any sense for Australia to come in and interfere with OUR Civil War? Of course not. Then again, I don't see any realistic timeline for their war to be over with, but I don't care either.

This is not a civil war. We are fighting terrorists spilling over the border from Iran ( Many from the Revolutionary Guard). This war will end when we wipe out Iran. I have no problem nuking Iran to glass, however that will never be allowed to happen unfortunately. So we will have to put troops on the ground sooner or later.

2007-02-04 22:02:02

#20

Turquoise: O Canada; +1,596|6831|North Carolina

gun.KingRat wrote:
Not wrote:
This is clearly a Civil War. I don't understand why we're there. Nothing can convince me that we have any purpose there any more. Let them kill each other into the stone age for all I care, just keep our kids out of the crossfire.

Would it have made any sense for Australia to come in and interfere with OUR Civil War? Of course not. Then again, I don't see any realistic timeline for their war to be over with, but I don't care either.
This is not a civil war. We are fighting terrorists spilling over the border from Iran ( Many from the Revolutionary Guard). This war will end when we wipe out Iran. I have no problem nuking Iran to glass, however that will never be allowed to happen unfortunately. So we will have to put troops on the ground sooner or later.

Do you honestly think that invading Iran would be successful? Sure, we'd destroy their government, but the people would fight us just like the Iraqis have. We would only be spreading more chaos throughout the region.

Honestly, nuking Iran would be a better option -- despite how evil it would look. The repercussions of nuking Iran would actually be less negative than of invading them, because we wouldn't have to rebuild anything, and the terrorists there would be dead (along with all the civilians, nonetheless).

Either way, if we attack Iran in one way or another, we'll have effectively declared war on most of the Islamic World.

2007-02-04 23:11:51

#21

Bubbalo: The Lizzard; +541|6987

Oh, yes, "they" are very scary. "They" were the British, "they" were the Nazis, "they" were the Soviets, and now "they" are Islam. And if not everyone who is "them" wishes you harm, then they shouldn't be part of "them", right?

2007-02-04 23:30:50

#22

legionair: back to i-life; +336|7049|EU

Bubbalo wrote:
Oh, yes, "they" are very scary. "They" were the British, "they" were the Nazis, "they" were the Soviets, and now "they" are Islam. And if not everyone who is "them" wishes you harm, then they shouldn't be part of "them", right?

what more to add? dunno why are you (US) still holding there (ok, oil is very good reason). I say that we let them fight with each other and after send there UN forces, ppl do not like to be occupaid.

Or leave the Iraq and start with Iran or North Korea, at least some changes /sarcasm

2007-02-05 03:04:07

#23

.:XDR:.PureFodder: Member; +105|7255

ATG wrote:
BN wrote:
ATG wrote:
Lets pull back, and nuke them ( Islam ) if they ever attack us again ( ala 9-11 ).
the majority of 911 hijackers where saudi and the extext of Israel's involvement is classified.

Maybe u should be bombing elsewhere...
You prove Israel had a hand in 9-11 & I'll advocate bombing Israel.

If someone could prove that the US had a hand in 9/11 would you advocate bombing yourself?

2007-02-05 04:01:46

#24

m3thod: All kiiiiiiiiinds of gainz; +2,197|7097|UK

ATG wrote:
Why bother again?

http://today.reuters.com/news/articlene … amp;rpc=22

http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/16616389.htm

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - A U.S.-Iraqi campaign to stabilize Baghdad will begin soon and the offensive against militants will be on a scale never seen during four years of war, American officers said on Sunday.
These people don't want us there and I don't want my fellow citizens dying for them anyway.

Lets pull back, and nuke them ( Islam ) if they ever attack us again ( ala 9-11 ).

Lambs to the slaughter.

Why oh why do people type that? "lets nuke em". Don't you ever learn? its extermists, subsisute muslim and islam for extermists.

Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.

2007-02-05 04:53:00

#25

TeamZephyr: Maintaining My Rage Since 1975; +124|6955|Hillside, Melbourne, Australia

Turquoise wrote:
Honestly, nuking Iran would be a better option -- despite how evil it would look.

If you want America to be under constant terrorist attacks for the next 100 years plus then by all means nuke Iran, the world and the Arabs will judge you more harshly than ever before.

You'd be seeing lot of terrorist attacks from people from other places than Islam if that was to happen..........

BF2S Forums Baghdad offensive set to begin

ATG wrote:

BN wrote:

ATG wrote:

ATG wrote:

ATG wrote:

BN wrote:

ATG wrote:

BN wrote:

ATG wrote:

BN wrote:

ATG wrote:

BN wrote:

ATG wrote:

Not wrote:

gun.KingRat wrote:

Not wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

ATG wrote:

BN wrote:

ATG wrote:

ATG wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Board footer