cheshiremoe
Evil Geniuses for a sparsely populated tomorrow
+50|6711
I like servers that are full (more than 40 players). 

What I really like is small maps with 64 players (only played this a couple of times), the rounds are really fast and extremely intense. Most small maps don't have too far to walk but the squad leader spawn point is more important.  I can understand some people would lag out a lot more.

Last edited by cheshiremoe (2007-01-29 13:23:21)

Snake
Missing, Presumed Dead
+1,046|6568|England

"Big" maps: 40-64.
Everything else: 32, no more than that in most cases.
.:ronin:.|Patton
Respekct dad i love u always
+946|6811|Marathon, Florida Keys

CoronadoSEAL wrote:

.:ronin:.|Patton wrote:

k30dxedle wrote:


...Oven?
Yes. Oven. Isnt that the thing your computer connects too to play a mulitplayer game?
sometimes it is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than it is to open it and remove all doubt.
-mark twain
I honestly dont give a shit what mark twain says
-Me
https://i54.photobucket.com/albums/g117/patton1337/stats.jpg
ZekersSneakers
Member
+8|6506
64 ftw.
bennisboy
Member
+829|6648|Poundland

7h3647h32in6 wrote:

I most definitely play on the largest maps with the most amount of people as a sniper...

Winning or losing doesn't matter much to me. What's more important is how many heads I can pop in a row.
steelie34
pub hero!
+603|6383|the land of bourbon
16 players on a 64 server is cool if you're going for awards... long rounds, lots of time to get things done,  but 64 players makes for insane rounds.  Seems a lot more like a 'war' than the small games.
https://bf3s.com/sigs/36e1d9e36ae924048a933db90fb05bb247fe315e.png
seymorebutts443
Ready for combat
+211|6597|Belchertown Massachusetts, USA
like patton posted eariler. 64 player, the way it was meant to be played.
CoronadoSEAL
pics or it didn't happen
+207|6520|USA

.:ronin:.|Patton wrote:

CoronadoSEAL wrote:

.:ronin:.|Patton wrote:


Yes. Oven. Isnt that the thing your computer connects too to play a mulitplayer game?
sometimes it is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than it is to open it and remove all doubt.
-mark twain
I honestly dont give a shit what mark twain says
-Me
that was a fairly intelligent comment.  but that attitude will prove successful later in your life im sure.
Inimicus_7
Member
+26|6364|England, UK
32 Map with 20 Players = The best.
FrankieSpankie3388
Hockey Nut
+243|6532|Boston, MA
I enjoy about 24-36 people. I don't like it too crazy, you die pretty much every other step.
JaggedPanther
Member
+61|6476

steelie34 wrote:

16 players on a 64 server is cool if you're going for awards... long rounds, lots of time to get things done,  but 64 players makes for insane rounds.  Seems a lot more like a 'war' than the small games.
QFT


64 players is why I play BF2
straz_mataz
Banned
+86|6536|Edmonton Alberta
either 40-64 players usually
20-40 for I/O
or 25 or less if all i want to do is solo in a helo and then i play dragon/dalian/daqing
demois411
Member
+1|6367

CoronadoSEAL wrote:

63 so i can get in.
Lol...

I use to play 32 player maps of fushe pass and stalemate back in the day like crazy. I hate the 64 man version of those maps. Too boring.
genius_man16
Platinum Star whore
+365|6680|Middle of nowhere
Wake - 50-64 players
City Maps - 24-40 players
Everything else - 20-32 players


say, if they made a 128 player map, would you guys play it?

Last edited by genius_man16 (2007-01-29 20:03:59)

ryanv12
Member
+10|6343|San Francisco, CA, USA

genius_man16 wrote:

say, if they made a 128 player map, would you guys play it?
If it was on maps the size of Daqing or Dragon Valley and it didn't lag like a mofo, YES. You could have actual battles with lots of infantry and armor going on all over the map. It's a dream really
Major.League.Infidel
Make Love and War
+303|6480|Communist Republic of CA, USA
48 is a good number for me.  Quite a lot of people, but not as much lag and random spam deaths.
MagikTrik
yes.....but your still gay
+138|6372|Pittsburgh, PA USA
I'll look for an almost maxed out 32 man server w/ 64 player maps, if I can't find one with decent ping then I'll usually just hop into the first one on the list.
weasel_thingo
Member
+74|6328
32 on a 64 infantry only mainly mec maps is what i play the most.
joker8baller
Member
+68|6669
60-64... Lots of action ^^
Andoura
Got loooollllll ?
+853|6641|Montreal, Qc, Canada
i like the 32 players map with 16 and more player in it
Jbrar
rawr
+86|6544|Winterpeg, Canada

joker8baller wrote:

60-64... Lots of action ^^
And I'll occasionally go for a 40 man if it's a 32 player map.
HUNDaemon
Exploit/Glitch "Tester"
+49|6377|Inside the AR Rockets.
32 Players FTW, No nade spamming, little or no spawn raping, just an excellent number.
AWSMFOX
Banned
+405|6465|A W S M F O X
I always go for the full 64 servers, but 32 is okay.
churn
Banned
+0|6289
64 player servers Got a shit computer and connection but still seem to own fairly on most of them...

Last edited by churn (2007-02-10 14:40:56)

xintegrityx
set your body ablaze
+37|6731|Louisiana
I find 48 to be perfect.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard