| Yes. Who are we to judge | 20% | 20% - 53 | ||||
| No. You get what you deserve | 70% | 70% - 184 | ||||
| Undecided. Still thinking on that one | 9% | 9% - 24 | ||||
| Total: 261 | ||||||
38 minutes.Marlboroman82 wrote:
how long did his victims take to die?
and is it worth the death of innocent, to get some kind of revenge on murderers? isn´t it murder, too?RicardoBlanco wrote:
making sure the guy you kill is actually guilty. 100% certainty is hard to prove.
It is murder, but I think that's the point. Put it this way; say, hypothetically, you had a five year old daughter and she was brutally gang raped, tortured, and then mutilated and murdered by two men in full control of their faculties. The evidence was indisputable and the option of the death penalty was there. You'd be a better man than me if you turned that option down. I'd want them dead and for their death to have been 'uncomfortable'.[pt] KEIOS wrote:
and is it worth the death of innocent, to get some kind of revenge on murderers? isn´t it murder, too?RicardoBlanco wrote:
making sure the guy you kill is actually guilty. 100% certainty is hard to prove.
you can prevent serial killers, from doing it again, by not releasing them anymore.
death penalty is a relict from the last century. get civilized and ban it! lock them up in jail, but let them live, because (for all christians) only he, who gave live, shall take it...
Last edited by RicardoBlanco (2006-12-14 08:49:12)
Last edited by Jenkinsbball (2006-12-14 08:57:25)
Prison time = tax dollars. And our prisons are over-populated as it is. They also need to make our prisons harder so people stop going back.[pt] KEIOS wrote:
and is it worth the death of innocent, to get some kind of revenge on murderers? isn´t it murder, too?RicardoBlanco wrote:
making sure the guy you kill is actually guilty. 100% certainty is hard to prove.
you can prevent serial killers, from doing it again, by not releasing them anymore.
death penalty is a relict from the last century. get civilized and ban it! lock them up in jail, but let them live, because (for all christians) only he, who gave live, shall take it...
Yeah, the three strikes rule is lame. Steal 3 cars and get caught each time = 25 years in jail? Pretty excessive if you ask me.silo1180 wrote:
Prison time = tax dollars. And our prisons are over-populated as it is. They also need to make our prisons harder so people stop going back.[pt] KEIOS wrote:
and is it worth the death of innocent, to get some kind of revenge on murderers? isn´t it murder, too?RicardoBlanco wrote:
making sure the guy you kill is actually guilty. 100% certainty is hard to prove.
you can prevent serial killers, from doing it again, by not releasing them anymore.
death penalty is a relict from the last century. get civilized and ban it! lock them up in jail, but let them live, because (for all christians) only he, who gave live, shall take it...
If there were a way for proving 100% that someone were guilty of murder, I think they should be executed for it. I know there are currently flaws in even our DNA evidence, but we are getting there. And none of this 3 strike stuff anymore... you didn't learn the first two times.
Take a life, lose a life.
Don't we also say "an eye for an eye a tooth for a tooth?"[pt] KEIOS wrote:
and is it worth the death of innocent, to get some kind of revenge on murderers? isn´t it murder, too?RicardoBlanco wrote:
making sure the guy you kill is actually guilty. 100% certainty is hard to prove.
you can prevent serial killers, from doing it again, by not releasing them anymore.
death penalty is a relict from the last century. get civilized and ban it! lock them up in jail, but let them live, because (for all christians) only he, who gave live, shall take it...
FUCK YEAH!!! Fargo style...ATG wrote:
Solution: pull one of these into the prison yard.
http://i10.tinypic.com/334hlyg.jpg
http://i12.tinypic.com/40emm3m.jpg
Give them a pint of vodka and some valium and rig a conveyour belt feeding them in after they pass out.
It was sick, but funny...kmt wrote:
That's really not nice. That's pretty harsh. Not human. The thing you just posted is what they would have done in Concentration Camps. That was just a sick joke.ATG wrote:
Solution: pull one of these into the prison yard.
http://i10.tinypic.com/334hlyg.jpg
http://i12.tinypic.com/40emm3m.jpg
Give them a pint of vodka and some valium and rig a conveyour belt feeding them in after they pass out.
The man had to pay for his deeds still it's correct to let him suffer just as his victims. But in such a sloppy way, no. In my opinion Death Penalty shouldn't exist killing people because they killed someone is just weird. I don't really know if Death Penalty should exist or not.. Still don't know
I have a great solution for that problem: don't steal cars. The only thing excessive here is the stupidity of someone who keeps getting caught and keeps committing crimes.Jenkinsbball wrote:
Yeah, the three strikes rule is lame. Steal 3 cars and get caught each time = 25 years in jail? Pretty excessive if you ask me.
Unfortunately, with all the appeals they get, it actually costs more to execute them than to keep them locked up forever.silo1180 wrote:
Prison time = tax dollars. And our prisons are over-populated as it is. They also need to make our prisons harder so people stop going back.
Exactly.lkjahdjsdsd wrote:
Why should you have to pay taxes for some body who killed a member of your family.
By basic doctrine its frowned upon.,yet it can be justified because of the biblical principle of adhering to laws of the land. A lot of anti death penalties are supported by various religious groups. Most Christians that I know of support the death penalty under the old Mosaic law of "eye for an eye". Any other religious groups out there care to share their views.The_Shipbuilder wrote:
I'm curious to hear from Christians in favor of the death penalty. How can you justify your support, given the fundamental teachings and beliefs of your faith?
