VeNg3nCe^ wrote:
Its all situational, I don't see how anyone can say "I only use L85, M16 sucks!" or something similar.
QFE.
I don't understand the constantly repeated threads/discusssions about which gun is "better". They're all reasonably balanced, and all different.
Yes, a lot of people insist that the stocks are the best. Most of these people are clannies, who play in clan matches on unranked servers, and therefore
must use the stocks. With all the extra practice with them, of course they seem like the best to those guys. (I'm not trying to start a fight or anything, I'm just pointing it out as a generalisation).
I use whatever weapon I think is best for the situation or which I'm in the particular mood for. If it's close-quarters, I'll pick a weapon which favours damage and rate of fire over accuracy, if long-range, I'll pick something the other way around.
For engineers, I'll use the pump shotguns if I'm out hunting infantry, but prefer the MP7 if I'm tanking and want something to riddle that Spec-Ops fucker who's running up behind me. For sniping, I like the L96A1, but if the map is swarming with guys in body-armour (say it's an Armoured Fury map with loads of AT), the the M95 has a distinct advantage.
The only unlocks that I've got a definited dislike for are:
The Jackhammer: Just seems like such a random weapon. You spray, and either the guy dies or you run out of ammo and he kills you. You have very little input.
The MG36: The bastard hybrid of the LMGs. Doesn't have the power of the PKM, and doesn't have the rate of fire of the stocks. Accuracy at range seems to be its thing, but... well, the PKM does that too.
The SCAR-L: Personal dislike. I know I'm not alone on this either. The recoil penalties are just nuts. I know some people swear by it, but it's one of those you either love or loath, and I loath it.
And to those who insist that Weapon X is the 'pwnz0r', give the others a go. If nothing else, a bit of diversity keeps the game more interesting...