BF2S Forums BF2 vs CSS Round one! Fight!

64 players
Ranking System
The forums are better... bf2s
Tanks
Jets
Choppers
Kits
Sqauds
Commanders
Badges/Medals/Ribbons
Graphics?
Re-spawn
Reviving/Healing

The list goes on...

However, there are many more bugs in BF2 than in CSS. I have both games but i prefer BF2

Last edited by liquidat0r (2006-06-05 11:05:16)

CS:S beats BF2 when it comes to 'infantry' fighting, without a doubt. Although the grenades are better. Try to get him interested in vehicles, maybe. or sniping, wich is more fun than in CS:S. (more long-distance shots)

BF2 = Better Game.
CS:S = Less Bugs.

CS:S teamwork beats BF2 teamwork by far... Because no-one on BF2 wants to work as a team with you...
CS:S - not laggy and lots of fun and fast ways of playing
BF2 - Big and evil ...and lots of different things to do without saving money before a round

They're both as good as one another in there own right

Last edited by Zeon. (2006-06-05 11:06:55)

EvilMonkeySlayer wrote:

DaReJa wrote:

BF2 = Better Game.
CS:S = Less Bugs.

Fixed that for you.

Fixed That. .

the ground and urban tactics in BF are far more superiour to CS what the thell are you talking about. i played CS when SIege was the map to play. trust me i know



basra streets is one the best maps ever made in the history of urban maps...check it out.

EvilMonkeySlayer wrote:

DaReJa wrote:

BF2 = Better Game.
CS = Less Bugs.

Fixed that for you.

CS:S doesnt have any apparent bugs and is riddled with hackers just as bf2 is. At least you cant clip into a wall in CS:S and stab someones foot.

One reason: Strike at Karkand!

somethingawful.com wrote:Constantly Vote to Change the Map to "Strike at Karkand" - This is singlehandedly the greatest map in the history of anything. The game developers should've released Battlefield 2 with only this map, and named the game "Battlefield Karkand." There's absolutely no reason to play any other map, unless of course you have some brain disorder which prevents you from making well informed decisions. Strike at Karkand has everything; tanks, buildings, jeeps, trash dumpsters, and a train. A GODDAMN TRAIN!!! Plus there are plenty of rooftops for snipers to climb and perch on for countless hours, until mom gets home and starts complaining about the bathroom being on fire.*sarcasm off*

bennisboy wrote:

liquidat0r wrote:

64 players
Ranking System
The forums are better... bf2s
Tanks
Jets
Choppers
Kits
Sqauds
Commanders
Badges/Medals/Ribbons
Graphics?
Re-spawn
Reviving/Healing

The list goes on...

However, there are many more bugs in BF2 than in CSS. I have both games but i prefer BF2

Grapics, that is a big NO the CSS graphics kick BF2's, also you're right about bugs, but I agree bf2 is more fun

Sure, CSS might have better graphcs and physics than BF2, but think about how big the maps are in BF2. Having bigger maps balance out the the graphics. I rather prefer bigger maps with a little bit low detail graphics than small maps with realistic details where a player only need 2 minutes to walk through the whole map.

Last edited by DarkNova (2006-06-05 11:42:56)

BAD

BF 2 and CSS = too many damn n00bs

Hacial wrote:

Zeon. wrote:

CS:S teamwork beats BF2 teamwork by far... Because no-one on BF2 wants to work as a team with you...

QUOTED FOR TRUTH, if you do not organize some kind of friend following on a server or take your clan to rape some pubers on an official EA server there is no such thing as teamwork, everyone wants to be the hero pilot and chopper pilot or team kill for such vehicles. Nobody just hops in the blackhawk anymore to ride over to a flag due to inconveniences like black hawk gun doesnt PWWWWWNNN anymore and you cant cap a flag with everyone sitting in it.

LAAAAAME!

CS:S - not laggy and lots of fun and fast ways of playing
BF2 - Big and evil ...and lots of different things to do without saving money before a round

Both games have their ups and downs both are riddled with connection issues, biggest problem with cs is some people have way too much control over their cfg files and can modify things like max bit rates and transfer rates to servers which cause them to hop around on other peoples servers. Its more open ended in its SOURCE *pun*

They're both as good as one another in there own right

TRUTH

You say that CSS has better teamwork than BF2!? Man only teamwork in CSS I can see is following the bomb...

There is differences in the teamwork associated with both games, be it as you said the option of medics and resuppliers. Teamwork in cs consists of having a sniper to watch your ass or scout potential bogeys entering your area. A guy with a shotgun to confront enemies up close, and a couple of guys with AK's or M4's as a redundancy to a sniper who doesnt always hit his target with an AWP which is pretty rare.

And CSS is laggy! I mean when I played it everybody no matter where I went on all server people complain about lag...

Latency issues depend on the server host and their tick rates. I am sure you werent joining servers that werent pubs' and most likely were not 100 tick servers as well.

In BF2 there's no lag except now this patch 1.3..

BULL SHIT!!! And if you want to tell me my computer sucks you would need to know something about it to back such an asinine statement up.

Well then, maybe we could try to spot BAD things about CSS, what makes it much worse than BF2. My top reasons:

1) Half of the players cheat because VAC is piece of shit. (Tested it, went to VAC server putted on Aimbot, wallhack and thing what showed every single object.)

You havent tested vac recently have you?

2) Lag

I am in a CS clan with a server on the other side of the country I live in and ping 120 to 78 constantly and I dont have lag issues there. As opposed to me playing on a server where I ping 4-9 I lag badly. It all depends on the host and not your latency reading. Someone elses bit rates in their config affect others playing in that same server. Some servers have their admin console automatically adjust your bit rates when you join their servers so it doesnt cause latency issues for other regulars.

3) Rounds and maps are fucking way too repetive.

Im sorry that was just retarded. CS:S has been around for almost 4 years now? the maps themselves have been around for almost 8-9 years. If battlefield 2 even LASTS as long in the gaming industry you're not going to tell me KARKAND is not repetitive. Fuck I've been playing this game for a year and I will be damned if 600 out of 1200 servers arent running KARKAND 24/7 these days in every flavor from BIG POINTS, PISTOLS AND KNIFES, INFANTRY ONLY, BLAH BLAH BLAH!!!

Edit// I didn't do poll because I didn't know there is actually so many people defending CSS!

Its not for everyone I can admit but I cant say that I dont enjoy playing it. If anything my new found ability to conserve instead of noob spray from CS:S has helped my bf2 play greatly, and when going back over to CS I have found my aim to be rediculously more accurate and requiring less shots for kills.

You cant beat that with a baseball bat IMO.

A mere Shadow|= wrote:

O_O


However


O_o

It should be like this

http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?la … %3A+Source