Wow....just Wow

2006-05-14 16:08:38

#1

elite: Member; +89|6724|Sheffield, England

Omg the graphics on this are just fucking amazing, imagine wr games that graphics.. i cant wait

http://www.exhilarate-gaming.com/page.php?14

its almost photo realistic

Last edited by elite (2006-05-14 16:10:22)

2006-05-14 16:11:08

#2

THA: im a fucking .....well not now; +609|6781|AUS, Canberra

wow it was looking really good till the ea sign came up at the end.

2006-05-14 16:13:21

#3

DaReJa: BF2s US Server Admin; +257|6637|Los Angeles, California, US.

the_heart_attack wrote:
wow it was looking really good till the ea sign came up at the end.

lol.

Good Graphics. .

Battlelog: DaReJa
MyBFi/BF3i Admin

AKA DanielRJ
GameSurge IRC Network, Support Agent and Staff
Phuzion IRC Network, Support Director and Operator

2006-05-14 16:20:35

#4

[killer]manxs: Member; +148|6659|San Diego C.A.

wow, kind of like halo's

2006-05-14 16:27:03

#5

(T)eflon(S)hadow: R.I.P. Neda; +456|6839|Grapevine, TX

Qfe

2006-05-14 16:32:57

#6

kessel!: Peruvian Cocaine; +261|6775|Toronto Canada

yeah that shit looks sooo good. can anyone post more info on it?

2006-05-14 16:40:27

#7

First_and_Only: Member; +4|6586|ON, Canada

and the 50 $ game ends up costing u 1500$ for the amazing pc it will take 2 run it

2006-05-14 16:46:13

#8

jnick: Member; +22|6792

Crysis ftw!

2006-05-14 16:50:08

#9

Kobrakai: Weirdo; +152|6798|England

https://img388.imageshack.us/img388/1217/dogwowtext2qc.jpg

2006-05-14 16:51:59

#10

Ty: Mass Media Casualty; +2,398|6785|Noizyland

So... what is it for?
I'd love to see it but I'm at Uni at the moment.

[Blinking eyes thing]
Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/tzyon

2006-05-14 16:52:04

#11

WormGuts: Member; +17|6804|Dayton, Ohio

muahahaha it's another EA game...they'll screw it up.

2006-05-14 17:20:15

#12

Buzerk1: Member; +44|6846

Available on VISTA only... This is a demo that Crytek did to show the power of Direct X 10, but they don't call it Direct X anymore, it's something else... and it's for VISTA only... WinXP will still be able to use some of the feature you saw but not all.

2006-05-14 17:28:20

#13

CommieChipmunk: Member; +488|6580|Portland, OR, USA

damn technology... computers goes from top of the line to shit in a month i swear..

2006-05-14 17:30:23

#14

JE3146: Member; +109|6581|Oregon

CommieChipmunk wrote:
damn technology... computers goes from top of the line to shit in a month i swear..

One reason why I'm so content with my shitty PC right now when everyone tells me to upgrade my mobo and cpu lol.

I'll wait till after DX10 hits before I do my major upgrading.

I think things like this are gonna be the norm in the coming year. Photo-realism isn't too far off.

2006-05-14 17:35:24

#15

blademaster: I'm moving to Brazil; +2,075|6655

yeah i posted the link similar to this on the other thread hehehe looks nice

2006-05-14 17:40:54

#16

Prodie: Moderator Emeritus; +270|6784|Nova Scotia, Canada

WormGuts wrote:
muahahaha it's another EA game...they'll screw it up.

Coming from someone who put 600 hours into an EA game, and THA who put 150 into it...

Crysis looks amazing though!

2006-05-14 17:44:06

#17

buttered noodle: Member; +16|6656|ohio

First_and_Only wrote:
and the 50 $ game ends up costing u 1500$ for the amazing pc it will take 2 run it

ha ha, yea right, you'll spend about 3500 jiust for the nvidia qaud card setup, then about a grand for the proc or several grand if u go xeon, then at least $600-700 on (at least)4 gigs of the fastest fucking ddr2 u can find followed by a $200-300 mobo, $200 PSU, $90 XP oem license, massive case $200, after all the other tidbits the tower will start at 6 grand, which should be paired with an apple 30inch, so about 9-10 grand in total(double if xeons are ur fancy)

2006-05-14 17:49:48

#18

mjw: The All Rounder; +22|6769|Rotherham, England

it is the "sequel" to Farcry from Crytek and Ubisoft. The reason i say "sequel" is because it is not really a sequel but it is incredibly similar, but just with different characters and a different theme.
Crysis will be available on windows XP but only in dx9 mode obviously, so all the fancy graphics you see in that video will be DX10 only which means buying windows vista, and a brand new graphics card aswell.

Before people start saying that you don't need a new GPU for DX10, i'll correct them. DX10 IS NOT BACKWARDS COMPATABLE so therefore DX9 GPU's dont work with DX10 features. Windows vista has to have both DX9 and DX10 installed on it just to make sure that people can play their windows XP/2000 games on it.
If you dont believe me watch this video:
http://uk.gamespot.com/pc/sim/microsoft … media.html
(CLICK THE WINDOWS VISTA : DIRECTX10 AND GAMING VIDEO)

2006-05-14 17:51:12

#19

stryyker: bad touch; +1,682|6730|California

too bad its prerendered

2006-05-14 17:58:42

#20

jonnykill: The Microwave Man; +235|6690

the_heart_attack wrote:
wow it was looking really good till the ea sign came up at the end.

Exactly what I was thinking . First though was - no thanks .

2006-05-14 18:21:43

#21

Maj.Do: Member; +85|6762|good old CA

i wonder why Crytek would go with EA. hmm oh well im still buying it

2006-05-15 03:26:45

#22

mjw: The All Rounder; +22|6769|Rotherham, England

EA bought the rights of Ubisoft last year i think, and theres not much Crytek could do really unless they would have been brave enough to say no to EA, which would be incredibly stupid on the business side of things.
EA make game developers a lot of money and thus i dont think anybody would say no when EA comes knocking on their doorstep.
Besides i keep saying people are far too critical of EA when it comes to BF2 anyway:
1. DICE are in control of patches/fixes etc... EA just market the product for them (and take all the shit from gamers for them aswell)
2. How many games are as succesfull as BF2 has been- answer is, not many. So it obviously has something going for it, regardless of the numerous "annoying bugs" that it has.

Last edited by mjw (2006-05-15 03:27:05)

2006-05-15 03:33:54