pish180 wrote:
Correct me if i am wrong. To me the spawn point is safe until you take the flag to neutral (isant that why the made the flag neutral and not just instantly your flag????) (think about it, it works 2 ways) I beleive that is why they put the sub-spawn pts away from the flag, instead of having everyone spawn right next to the flag.
Yeah you are wrong, is like walking through a fire fight thinking nobody can hear, see you and kill you because you see your flag, I found that this is a mistake most players make. Never ever assume you are safe. Assumption is the mother of all fuck ups.
So that makes you experienced enough to decide who is n00b and who is not? Get real and stop being arrogant, learn from your enemy and your own mistakes and improve yourself. Even you should know that since you have played an awfull lot (with my respect for that of course and the slightest envy for the time that I just cannot seem to find).
pish180 wrote:
a player who does something stupid, often repeatedly. This would classify GL'er n00bs bc they run around with it out all the time, and kill people even if it means killing yourself. As well as MANY other things! I accept my actions! There have been times when i have done n00bish actions. But it doesnt happen often... most of the time it is either when I bomb a spawn pt with a jet that had our own peps at it, or the hand grenade glitch... where he makes no action of thowing the grenade it just flies out of his chest... (gotta love that one)
Euh, so? When I read this correctly and put one and two together you are actually saying: "hey pplz I am a n00b whom gets killed a lot at the spawn points and usually like to bounce undersling fired grenades back with my head and I can't stand it dying like that so I start complaining about my own playing style!!
ROFLOL. Well to press on the point, I am the only one whom is allowd to call me a n00b, how do you know if someone is a n00b? You can not look into someones brain can you?
pish180 wrote:
Never a war has been won by dying for your country, it has been won by making the other poor bastard die for his country! (gen. G.Patton)
Could you explain this, for i dont understand how this justifies spawn camping or how it has anything to do with spawn protection? Do re-enfocemtns instantly show up on the battlefield in real life??? (do you know something i dont??? teleport troops??)
So are you reffering to the game or real life? In BF2 you could say that the reinforcements are being teleported in. No reinforcements do not come in by teleporter in real war, they get there on foot, train, car, truck, boat, airoplane, chopper and so on. But you asked for the justification, okay. It is kind of realistic since moving reserves in suggests that movement takes place, during al action of movement one is more vunerable then in a dug in place, like having position on a roof top instead of getting there. Oh and this saying of Patton also goes for BF2, you still lose tickets when one respawns. So making the other poor bastard die for his team is winning with your own.
pish180 wrote:
Just a note do you think Becasue Gen Patton said that, that they did not have ethics?? You only know 1/2 of the story, Military has a Code of Conduct, Rules of Engagement and a UCMJ. You all say you know so much about war, and anything goes at war... THERE ARE MANY UPON MANY RULES TO WAR!! Obviously just like the game, and real life the rules can be broken, but unlike real life you get punished Via Courts Martial... Trust me... Your AFU once that happens!!! My point is dont keep using you real life military analogies as a copout, for you wanted to buff your stats. Just admit it... Denial is 1/2 the problem.
Ethics in war? Damn I must have woken up in a different world today. Or are you just being naieve? Stop watching the TV so much, these institutions are there but when a war starts they stop when the first bullet is being fired at once. And plz do explain to me since these ethics are so important to you (you brought it up, I did not!) why it is possible that the U.S. Congress has signed a law to invade the Netherlands when a soldier of the U.S. is being trailed in The Hague for war crimes (almost al other countries in this world have agreed upon that the War Tribunal in The Hague is the appointed place(even the Russian an Chinees if I am not mistaken)). Hmmm ethics? No, they are nothing but an illusion to keep the simple people from becoming affraid of war.
Ethics in war examples.
WWI: gas warfare
WWII: Flamethrowing tanks, 2 Nukes on Japan while Japan was fighting on its last breath. Is like killing you in BF2 with a tube launcher while you have one health bar!
Korea: US marines got surrounded (nasty fight, only fighting for your own survival and killing al prisoners and wounded (bye bye ethics)
Vietnam: Special Forces, Agent Orange
Iraq: War II, blowing up your own country men?
And not mentioning the fact that wars are always fought by politicians whom stay at home!! Ethics? Let me see a G.W. Bush in Iraq fighting the so called rebels. That would be a first!
Last edited by [SWAM]RobbieE (2005-09-30 06:18:23)