Which is why I say "fuck you" to anyone that wants to ban or restrict guns. Guns save lives, it is very ironic I know.SuperJail Warden wrote:
I'm betting a lot more people in Ukraine would be alive if the government wasn't the only ones with guns. I'm sure the citizens of Venezuela are wishing they had a 2nd amendment right about now. Assad wouldn't be in power if the revolutionary forces of Syria had access to weapons early on.
Last edited by Pochsy (2014-02-23 16:01:07)
Nuclear weapons aren't necessary, regular bombs are good enough. Besides, regular bombs and guns don't generate radiation so that is a worthless argumentPochsy wrote:
I've brought up this point a number of times, but 2nd Amendment Right bangers seem to struggle with the concept of conflict escalation. You have a pistol. They have a fucking tank.
See: Entire cold war.
Bring on our nuclear weapons rights!
Last edited by War Man (2014-02-24 08:15:51)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleutian_Islands_CampaignShahter wrote:
armed civilians "helping" in all-out military conflict?
/facepalmCybargs wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleutian_Islands_CampaignShahter wrote:
armed civilians "helping" in all-out military conflict?
not only i heard about them, i actually had many opportunities to talk to some of them. did you? no? then gtfo, would you kindly.And I guess you never heard of partisans during WW2 either.
Why were they invented?War Man wrote:
Nuclear weapons aren't necessary, regular bombs are good enough. Besides, regular bombs and guns don't generate radiation so that is a worthless argumentPochsy wrote:
I've brought up this point a number of times, but 2nd Amendment Right bangers seem to struggle with the concept of conflict escalation. You have a pistol. They have a fucking tank.
See: Entire cold war.
Bring on our nuclear weapons rights!
Did the Ukrainian military do anything in the uprisings? No, they decided to remain neutral. Such a thing could happen here in the USA, either that or it splits relatively even and the armed civilians help tip the scales.
wait so armed civilians do "help" in an all-out military conflict?Shahter wrote:
/facepalmCybargs wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleutian_Islands_CampaignShahter wrote:
armed civilians "helping" in all-out military conflict?not only i heard about them, i actually had many opportunities to talk to some of them. did you? no? then gtfo, would you kindly.And I guess you never heard of partisans during WW2 either.
no, they don't.Cybargs wrote:
wait so armed civilians do "help" in an all-out military conflict?Shahter wrote:
/facepalmnot only i heard about them, i actually had many opportunities to talk to some of them. did you? no? then gtfo, would you kindly.And I guess you never heard of partisans during WW2 either.
so i guess those partisans were just chilling.Shahter wrote:
no, they don't.Cybargs wrote:
wait so armed civilians do "help" in an all-out military conflict?Shahter wrote:
/facepalmCybargs wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleutian_Islands_Campaign
not only i heard about them, i actually had many opportunities to talk to some of them. did you? no? then gtfo, would you kindly.
they were doing a lot of things, they just weren't civilians.Cybargs wrote:
so i guess those partisans were just chilling.
lol.Shahter wrote:
they were doing a lot of things, they just weren't civilians.Cybargs wrote:
so i guess those partisans were just chilling.
guess you never heard of an unorganized militia.Shahter wrote:
lol yourself, cretin. those of them, who actually contributed, had training, centralized command, military rankings and all that stuff. civilians they were not.
you keep guessing and assuming things about me. too shy to ask, kiddie, or what?Cybargs wrote:
guess you never heard of an unorganized militia.Shahter wrote:
lol yourself, cretin. those of them, who actually contributed, had training, centralized command, military rankings and all that stuff. civilians they were not.
you still mad about the cricket?KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
no he's just extremely ignorant, and a wannabe american. don't bother arguing with him
The only thing that registers on my anger meter is stupid people. That's a very serious answer to a benign comment.SuperJail Warden wrote:
Ken is just really angry that Cyborg is taller than him despite being Asian.
Cybargs is smarter than you. You're mad on a sub-conscious level because you know it.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
The only thing that registers on my anger meter is stupid people. That's a very serious answer to a benign comment.SuperJail Warden wrote:
Ken is just really angry that Cyborg is taller than him despite being Asian.
Cyborgs has demonstrated time and time again that he has either no idea what he's talking about and/or a 4th grade comprehension of most topics discussed here. His responses tend to range from facile regurgitation of Wikipedia-level blurbs to prepubescent "Lolz Austrian economics FTW". I have not read one sentence from the little twerp that demonstrates his knowledge of any topic. Until I do, the above-mentioned opinion will be the bar by which I don my white wig and gold-plated gavel to judge.
I couldn't care less about how much "bigger" anyone is than me. I'm about 5'6" and have no control over that aspect. To be angry or have some pent-up rage as a result of something out of my control would be quite silly, don't you think? Plus I watch MMA which is essentially the same as me training in the gym 2x a day, so I can kick all your asses IRL too
