When have I said asians should supply the demands of the white man?
Fuck Israel
you don't want asians to migrate to 'first-world' consumer-countries in the west. you want them to stay in their home economies, i.e. sweatshop/factory economies, supply economies, building the tat for minimum wage that fat white dudes like yourself consume. that is implicitly your argument. "why do you want to come here cybargs?" isn't it obvious? for a chance of a better life. but no, you'd rather they stay in their hi-tech banana republics, building ipod's for foxconn. their 'natural' place in the scheme of things, right?
but yes it's so easy to laugh at the dumb backwards opinion of the descendent of slave owners. you are enlightened. kekeke.
but yes it's so easy to laugh at the dumb backwards opinion of the descendent of slave owners. you are enlightened. kekeke.
When have I said they should be building our goods? I'd much rather we had the business here and they built up their nations themselves.
I just wondered, because I'm accused of racism for wanting to live in a white, western democracy, as opposed to a brutal, overpopulatd hellhole, but when a brown or yellow person comes to the same conclusion they aren't.
I just wondered, because I'm accused of racism for wanting to live in a white, western democracy, as opposed to a brutal, overpopulatd hellhole, but when a brown or yellow person comes to the same conclusion they aren't.
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2013-05-31 04:38:42)
Fuck Israel
I love how Uzique tries to put down others because they are descended from slave owners when he himself is British.
Thats the pot calling the kettle a nigger right there.
Thats the pot calling the kettle a nigger right there.
yeah because all british were slave owners
the fuck are you talking about? that's like saying everyone from the confederate south is a paid member of the KKK.
nobody in my family history owned slaves. also i wasn't "putting you down", i was saying how stupid it is to brag about it, and turn it in a point of pride. strange thing to take a family pride in.
the fuck are you talking about? that's like saying everyone from the confederate south is a paid member of the KKK.
nobody in my family history owned slaves. also i wasn't "putting you down", i was saying how stupid it is to brag about it, and turn it in a point of pride. strange thing to take a family pride in.
you're accused of racism for wanting to exclude non-whites from a country that your fat white ass went to and already took from non-whites. that's a little odd, no? claiming dibs on a country/economy/natural resources that aren't properly yours? you yourself being an immigrant? white people as a race being newcomers? seems a little odd to declare a whites-only-zone when you've already profited so much from the involvement and contribution of non-whites. especially strange considering it's not even a "white western democracy" historically.Dilbert_X wrote:
I just wondered, because I'm accused of racism for wanting to live in a white, western democracy, as opposed to a brutal, overpopulatd hellhole, but when a brown or yellow person comes to the same conclusion they aren't.
I wish I owned a slave. life would be so much better if I didn't have to iron my clothes, do dishes, or go to work. Personal androids can't come soon enough!
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
except most slaves weren't used for house-chores. they were the lucky few. most slaves propped up an entire economic system of wealth and privilege for free labour. not ironing clothes. you almost make it seem pastoral. it's an incredibly dumb comment for extra to make.Jay wrote:
I wish I owned a slave. life would be so much better if I didn't have to iron my clothes, do dishes, or go to work. Personal androids can't come soon enough!
an android wouldn't be a "slave" either, because android's have no will/volition. it would just be a tool.
Britain owned slaves and not only that subjugated several nations whom before meeting Britain were sovereign nations only to have their national and cultural identities raped by the British for monetary gain. You guys even treat your own soldiers like garbage and force them to die for your King appointed by God.Uzique The Lesser wrote:
yeah because all british were slave owners
the fuck are you talking about? that's like saying everyone from the confederate south is a paid member of the KKK.
nobody in my family history owned slaves. also i wasn't "putting you down", i was saying how stupid it is to brag about it, and turn it in a point of pride. strange thing to take a family pride in.
yeah, 'britain' owned slaves. i never claimed we didn't. my family though? no. idiot. you are bragging about your family owning slaves, as a specific thing. i said that is stupid. no contest.
king appointed by god? rofl what am i even reading. is this still the 18th century? you need to read a history book.
and we treat our soldiers like garbage? that's interesting. my cousin is an officer in the marines. i went to his passing through ceremony. didn't seem like they treated soldiers like garbage to me. please tell me more about how badly we treat our troops in comparison to americans.
king appointed by god? rofl what am i even reading. is this still the 18th century? you need to read a history book.
and we treat our soldiers like garbage? that's interesting. my cousin is an officer in the marines. i went to his passing through ceremony. didn't seem like they treated soldiers like garbage to me. please tell me more about how badly we treat our troops in comparison to americans.
Last edited by Uzique The Lesser (2013-05-31 07:49:29)
Battle of the Somme vs. The Battle of Belleau WoodUzique The Lesser wrote:
and we treat our soldiers like garbage? that's interesting. my cousin is an officer in the marines. i went to his passing through ceremony. didn't seem like they treated soldiers like garbage to me. please tell me more about how badly we treat our troops in comparison to americans.
Battle of Dunkirk vs Pearl Harbor
1776 and 1812 vs 1918 and 1941.
read
a
history
book
a
history
book
I did, it said that your country is full of twats.
- globefish23
- sophisticated slacker
- +334|6564|Graz, Austria
Those were war crimes in a war.Dilbert_X wrote:
If its OK to be proud of having dropped napalm on Charlie I think building the family fortune off the backs of slaves isn't hardly a big deal.
(And no, I don't want to nitpick about the international law and whether Vietnam and the USA actually were in a state of war.)
Slavery in the USA was just that - slavery.
They got their whole wealth from involuntary, forced labor of slaves.
For fucks sake!Dilbert_X wrote:
What would have happened if they'd travelled all that way and no-one had bought them or put them to work?
You're calling getting caught, sold and shipped like work animal "travelling"?
Slave trade only exists because there is a demand for slaves somewhere where slavery is either allowed or tolerated.
Dilbert, you've finally settled down in Lowing Land, being an equally racist idiot as him.
no, you see, that time he was "trolling". it's obvious, don't you see? it's easy to tell when dilbert is trolling because all the other times he is so open-minded and respectful about racial minorities and their 'place' vis-a-vis white people.
When have I said exclude them? I've just asked why they want to come here, to be surrounded by supposedly racist whites who don't want them here, is that really preferable to living amongst their fellows?Uzique The Lesser wrote:
you're accused of racism for wanting to exclude non-whites from a country that your fat white ass went to and already took from non-whites. that's a little odd, no? claiming dibs on a country/economy/natural resources that aren't properly yours? you yourself being an immigrant? white people as a race being newcomers? seems a little odd to declare a whites-only-zone when you've already profited so much from the involvement and contribution of non-whites. especially strange considering it's not even a "white western democracy" historically.Dilbert_X wrote:
I just wondered, because I'm accused of racism for wanting to live in a white, western democracy, as opposed to a brutal, overpopulatd hellhole, but when a brown or yellow person comes to the same conclusion they aren't.
I guess it must be.
Fuck Israel
What I don't understand is why the United States needs to have an opinion about literally every thing going on in the world. Now that Obama basically came out in support of regime change that means we have limited our own options as to how to resolve the crisis. Any backpedaling on our part will be perceived as weakness on the domestic front, even if public opinion doesn't really give a shit.13/f/taiwan wrote:
Turkish police caught Al-Qaeda/Syrian fighters with Sarin gas. It explains why the US immediately dismissed the claims by Carla Del Ponte(a very credible UN Human Rights Investigator) that the rebels may have used the chemical weapons. I'm interested to see how the west will spin this story.
In the meantime, the rebels have stated that they would not attend meetings brokered by the UN, US and Russia. Iranian elections are coming up and all the "candidates" are allied with the Ayatollah. There will be no more disagreements and fights between Ahmadinejad and the Supreme Leader. It also means more support for Hezbollah and Syria. And we still have Saudi Arabia, the primary supplier of arms/money to the Syrian rebels, headed for a change in leadership. What an exciting year! I'll be sure to keep everyone of you updated.
The reaction by the west was very premature. One of Obama's first lines was "Assad must go." They wanted Assad gone with no forethought to who would come after him. And they also underestimated internal tension in Syria/loyalty of the military and Russia's commitment to protect her interest in the region.
You can find more here: http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?pi … 0#p3896560
In other news, US lifted restrictions on sanctions that barred Apple products from being sold/imported to Iran. They call it a "measure of good will," and hope it will lead to greater political discourse throughout Iran. Apple brings the world together. Now all it needs to do is treat cancer.
You can find more here: http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?pi … 0#p3896560
In other news, US lifted restrictions on sanctions that barred Apple products from being sold/imported to Iran. They call it a "measure of good will," and hope it will lead to greater political discourse throughout Iran. Apple brings the world together. Now all it needs to do is treat cancer.
Wonder what kind of conversations were made behind closed doors, hmm? I'm sure Apple had nothing to do with it.
Also, with regards to Syria. I wouldn't be so quick to declare Assad the victor. I know Libya was a very different situation, but that war changed momentum 3 or 4 times. And the end came quickly.
First it was the protests. Then the violent crackdown.
Then the rebels took over Benghazi.
Then we bombed them right before they took back the city.
Then the rebels pushed back.
Then the rebels lost ground.
They pushed back again.
A stalemate happens.
Then out of nowhere Tripoli falls after the rebels infiltrated the city.
Misrata itself switched sides like dozens of times. Finding out what the hell was going on was confusing as fuck, for anyone trying to read American media.
I dont think the rebels in Syria will be as successful, but all it takes is one well placed car bomb or a sniper to take out the dictator. Then what happens after that?
Also, with regards to Syria. I wouldn't be so quick to declare Assad the victor. I know Libya was a very different situation, but that war changed momentum 3 or 4 times. And the end came quickly.
First it was the protests. Then the violent crackdown.
Then the rebels took over Benghazi.
Then we bombed them right before they took back the city.
Then the rebels pushed back.
Then the rebels lost ground.
They pushed back again.
A stalemate happens.
Then out of nowhere Tripoli falls after the rebels infiltrated the city.
Misrata itself switched sides like dozens of times. Finding out what the hell was going on was confusing as fuck, for anyone trying to read American media.
I dont think the rebels in Syria will be as successful, but all it takes is one well placed car bomb or a sniper to take out the dictator. Then what happens after that?
Last edited by Spearhead (2013-05-31 22:50:30)
1. what's going on turkey
2. why does there seem to be absolutely no attention being paid to it?
2. why does there seem to be absolutely no attention being paid to it?
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
1. fuck all. there's some riots which have escalated due to heavy handed police response.
2. it's a fairly localised issue. the government is likely to regain control of the peace.
2. it's a fairly localised issue. the government is likely to regain control of the peace.
glad the two australians between them could use their excellent /r/news skills to declare the state of turkey, safely and reasonably.
I learnt my turkey news from that video of the guy getting blasted by the water cannon and sliding down the pavement, and that woman eating a gas grenade.
In other turkey news, it's less than six months until Thanksgiving!
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat