Fixing DAST

2010-05-31 12:05:24

#1

Flaming_Maniac: prince of insufficient light; +2,490|6704|67.222.138.85

How do you want to see DAST change with an emphasis on the administration of the section?

If you want to see a "better" section we could try upping the intensity of the moderation significantly. Delete anything that is a personal attack, delete anything that does not significantly contribute, no more OPs with just a news article and two sentences at the bottom, outright ban repeat offenders in a much shorter timeframe, etc. But only if you want it. I'm not going to put more effort into something I don't enjoy doing if it's going to go unappreciated. A lot of posts will be deleted and probably significantly more bans than usual. But if you guys want it, I will make an effort.

All of this of course is predicated on your ability to generate content. You have to meet us halfway here. Making genuine topics and taking time with responses is what is going to make or break the changes. Trying to elevate a section only by deleting poor posts and banning members is a terrible way to go about things. You have to take some responsibility for the section as well.

On the other hand do you want to see it maintain its current course?

2010-05-31 12:06:59

#2

11 Bravo: Banned; +965|5234|Cleveland, Ohio

Have some user "mods" with the ability to delete posts but not ban or whatever. They need to be active also.

2010-05-31 12:08:01

#3

Trotskygrad: бля; +354|5996|Vortex Ring State

as long as posts with a sense of humour are still allowed, and only personal bashing is deleted, I agree.

However, less restrictions on OP, threads should be allowed to go wherever they go as long as there's a discussion going on that's SOMEWHAT related to the OP.

2010-05-31 12:08:03

#4

Turquoise: O Canada; +1,596|6402|North Carolina

I know where you're coming from. I guess I look at it like this.

Posters should usually try to post serious topics and responses, but a little humor mixed in with it isn't a problem. Sarcasm can sometimes go a long way.

Granted, I admit there is a fine line between sarcasm and trolling.

2010-05-31 12:08:24

#5

Flaming_Maniac: prince of insufficient light; +2,490|6704|67.222.138.85

11 Bravo wrote:
Have some user "mods" with the ability to delete posts but not ban or whatever. They need to be active also.

Why would you want people that could delete but not ban?

This has been brought up before, the general argument against is if you're going to find people you trust to delete content, why not just make them a full mod?

2010-05-31 12:10:14

#6

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6534|Long Island, New York

Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Delete anything that is a personal attack/ no more OPs with just a news article and two sentences at the bottom

Please.

2010-05-31 12:10:21

#7

paranoid101: Ambitious but Rubbish; +540|6737

Less trolling more Debating on the OP's threads, also less turning debates into a 2 man bandwagon when just 2 members just fighting with each other all through the thread and neither backs down even when wrong, gets boring.

Edit I dont post alot but I do read alot of the threads.

Last edited by paranoid101 (2010-05-31 12:11:21)

2010-05-31 12:11:10

#8

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5582

Poseidon wrote:
Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Delete anything that is a personal attack/ no more OPs with just a news article and two sentences at the bottom
Please.

2010-05-31 12:11:17

#9

11 Bravo: Banned; +965|5234|Cleveland, Ohio

Flaming_Maniac wrote:
11 Bravo wrote:
Have some user "mods" with the ability to delete posts but not ban or whatever. They need to be active also.
Why would you want people that could delete but not ban?

This has been brought up before, the general argument against is if you're going to find people you trust to delete content, why not just make them a full mod?

because bans are stupid

2010-05-31 12:12:27

#10

Trotskygrad: бля; +354|5996|Vortex Ring State

paranoid101 wrote:
Less trolling more Debating on the OP's threads, also less turning debates into a 2 man bandwagon when just 2 members just fighting with each other all through the thread and neither backs down even when wrong, gets boring.

Edit I dont post alot but I do read alot of the threads.

tbh, FEOS vs. F_M was a pretty good read.

2010-05-31 12:13:17

#11

Flaming_Maniac: prince of insufficient light; +2,490|6704|67.222.138.85

I think what would be helpful is if you guys posted some borderline posts/threads on here and said what you think should be done about content like that. Do not make it personal on this thread. Because obviously there has to be some sense of humor and I recognize concern, but there does have to be a line somewhere.

2010-05-31 12:13:38

#12

Wreckognize: Member; +294|6482

leave it as is. no use trying to fix the boat after it already sunk.

2010-05-31 12:14:09

#13

11 Bravo: Banned; +965|5234|Cleveland, Ohio

why does this section lack stickies while other sections half the first page is stickies?

2010-05-31 12:15:37

#14

Shahter: Zee Ruskie; +295|6772|Moscow, Russia

that won't work, fm. you'll have to permanently ban most of the regulars of this section - most of the more active and productive members, mind you. lowing, marine, atg, ruisleipa - the list goes on.

if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.

2010-05-31 12:15:47

#15

Turquoise: O Canada; +1,596|6402|North Carolina

11 Bravo wrote:
why does this section lack stickies while other sections half the first page is stickies?

Stickies are annoying, tbh

2010-05-31 12:17:11

#16

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5582

lowing, ATG, and Marine don't auto make it personal if you disagree with them. If you at least try to be civil and treat them with a little respect they won't make personal attacks.

2010-05-31 12:18:46

#17

paranoid101: Ambitious but Rubbish; +540|6737

Trotskygrad wrote:
paranoid101 wrote:
Less trolling more Debating on the OP's threads, also less turning debates into a 2 man bandwagon when just 2 members just fighting with each other all through the thread and neither backs down even when wrong, gets boring.

Edit I dont post alot but I do read alot of the threads.
tbh, FEOS vs. F_M was a pretty good read.

Maybe but don't you find in threads where 2 are at each others throats is that when others post to the op's thread, it normally gets lost with all the fighting between the 2.

Last edited by paranoid101 (2010-05-31 12:19:38)

2010-05-31 12:19:14

#18

jsnipy: ...; +3,276|6519|...

I think new posts in the DAST section should only be created by users who have proven themselves mature and have the ability to provide meaningful substance to a conversation.

Spoiler (highlight to read):

i.e. not me

2010-05-31 12:19:28

#19

Beduin: Compensation of Reactive Power in the grid; +510|5747|شمال

I think it is ok.

الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic

2010-05-31 12:19:37

#20

Trotskygrad: бля; +354|5996|Vortex Ring State

Macbeth wrote:
lowing, ATG, and Marine don't auto make it personal if you disagree with them. If you at least try to be civil and treat them with a little respect they won't make personal attacks.

qft.

Tbh we need moar mods.

IMO, only inflammatory posts should be deleted, along with the response they provoke.

Off topic posts are usually ignored/reported/deleted already

It's the flamewars that are really bringing down D/ST

2010-05-31 12:26:01

#21

jsnipy: ...; +3,276|6519|...

Trotskygrad wrote:
It's the flamewars that are really bringing down D/ST

its all it seems to be lately

2010-05-31 12:26:48

#22

ghettoperson: Member; +1,943|6646

I like personal attacks

2010-05-31 12:30:09

#23

jsnipy: ...; +3,276|6519|...

ghettoperson wrote:
I like personal attacks

That's what EE is for

2010-05-31 12:31:22

#24

11 Bravo: Banned; +965|5234|Cleveland, Ohio

well, why cant the DST chats thread be for personal attacks and junk like the EE one is? i see no issue with that tbh.

2010-05-31 12:50:49

#25

Shahter: Zee Ruskie; +295|6772|Moscow, Russia

Macbeth wrote:
lowing, ATG, and Marine don't auto make it personal if you disagree with them. If you at least try to be civil and treat them with a little respect they won't make personal attacks.

when they are sober - yeah, probably. should we implement alco-test in D&ST?
now, personally, i don't care about any "attacks" - nobody in here is capable of actually insulting me. FM, however, seems bent on turning this section into a girls school, which is bullshit, tbh.

if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.

BF2S Forums Fixing DAST

11 Bravo wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:

paranoid101 wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:

Trotskygrad wrote:

paranoid101 wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

Trotskygrad wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

Board footer