yea hurri was limited for a while. month or so i think
I really don't see how someone getting multiple short-term bans for the same thing in a short time frame, then turning right around and doing the exact same thing that they've been banned for repeatedly already again doesn't seem like adequate justification for a longer-term ban.Miggle wrote:
I never said it wasn't adequately explained. I said it was the dumbest thing I had heard all day. Which it was.FEOS wrote:
I'm not "talking down to to you" from anywhere. OH clearly explained what Teds was banned for the amount of time he was. It was clear that it wasn't based on a single incident, and it wasn't without tons of warning.Stimey wrote:
Stop fucking talking down on us from your high horse.
It's dead simple....and then people say it's still not adequately explained? Really?
Hmmmm...were you talking about the ban or Teds' behavior?
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
I think banning teds for flaming was really dumb. In general. Even the short term ones.
We do have the ignore thing now. Serious flaming between two members is never random and always part of a larger conflict between them. If both decline to use the ignore feature on each other I don't see were there would be much room for mods to step in.Miggle wrote:
I think banning teds for flaming was really dumb.
Macbeth wrote:
We do have the ignore thing now. Serious flaming between two members is never random and always part of a larger conflict between them. If both decline to use the ignore feature on each other I don't see were there would be much room for mods to step in.Miggle wrote:
I think banning teds for flaming was really dumb.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
I do not understand.
it sucked more than a straight-up temp ban tbhMiggle wrote:
I think they did it marine too and he left.
And hurri IIRC
By this logic almost every one in the BF3 main thread should be temp banned, or should been have repeatedly over the last months resulting in a month long ban for most of us.
BanSisco wrote:
By this logic almost every one in the BF3 main thread should be temp banned, or should been have repeatedly over the last months resulting in a month long ban for most of us.
D:
The problem in this case is that it wasn't really "between" two of them. Just one-way, really.Macbeth wrote:
We do have the ignore thing now. Serious flaming between two members is never random and always part of a larger conflict between them. If both decline to use the ignore feature on each other I don't see were there would be much room for mods to step in.Miggle wrote:
I think banning teds for flaming was really dumb.
And there is the ignore feature, as you've pointed out. And as has been pointed out to Teds.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
The lack of consistency on this forum is appalling. Teds gets a permanent ban for whatever, and Macbeth gets an AWM for calling my stepfather a janitor and my father a junkie welfare case. That kid should've been launched from the forums instantly. Good job OH.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
I thought Teds was on a 1 month ban?
The shape of an eye in front of the ocean, digging for stones and throwing them against its window pane. Take it down dreamer, take it down deep. - Other Families
It's pretty ridiculous that I get AWMs for responding back to your personal attacks. I guess I should start reporting like a girl everytime someone hurts my feelings.Jay wrote:
The lack of consistency on this forum is appalling. Teds gets a permanent ban for whatever, and Macbeth gets an AWM for calling my stepfather a janitor and my father a junkie welfare case. That kid should've been launched from the forums instantly. Good job OH.
I love how my previous post got deleted but the one calling me out stays. Hmmmm
He is.Pochsy wrote:
I thought Teds was on a 1 month ban?
Miggle wrote:
I never said it wasn't adequately explained. I said it was the dumbest thing I had heard all day. Which it was.FEOS wrote:
I'm not "talking down to to you" from anywhere. OH clearly explained what Teds was banned for the amount of time he was. It was clear that it wasn't based on a single incident, and it wasn't without tons of warning.Stimey wrote:
Stop fucking talking down on us from your high horse.
It's dead simple....and then people say it's still not adequately explained? Really?
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?pi … 0#p3670490jord wrote:
Miggle wrote:
I never said it wasn't adequately explained. I said it was the dumbest thing I had heard all day. Which it was.FEOS wrote:
I'm not "talking down to to you" from anywhere. OH clearly explained what Teds was banned for the amount of time he was. It was clear that it wasn't based on a single incident, and it wasn't without tons of warning.
It's dead simple....and then people say it's still not adequately explained? Really?
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Uh-huh, and people who say they're glad other forum members were abused as children? I guess they should be launched somewhere too.Jay wrote:
The lack of consistency on this forum is appalling. Teds gets a permanent ban for whatever, and Macbeth gets an AWM for calling my stepfather a janitor and my father a junkie welfare case. That kid should've been launched from the forums instantly. Good job OH.
(Which I wasn't BTW)
Русский военный корабль, иди на хуй!
Not really when there's a limited amount of contributing members on the forum and we're all big boys. It's been pointed out before, but for some reason you seem to think enforcing rules that were created when the forum had a large influx of members is logical still.FEOS wrote:
I really don't see how someone getting multiple short-term bans for the same thing in a short time frame, then turning right around and doing the exact same thing that they've been banned for repeatedly already again doesn't seem like adequate justification for a longer-term ban.Miggle wrote:
I never said it wasn't adequately explained. I said it was the dumbest thing I had heard all day. Which it was.FEOS wrote:
I'm not "talking down to to you" from anywhere. OH clearly explained what Teds was banned for the amount of time he was. It was clear that it wasn't based on a single incident, and it wasn't without tons of warning.
It's dead simple....and then people say it's still not adequately explained? Really?
Hmmmm...were you talking about the ban or Teds' behavior?
I got news brah, it isn't.
Last edited by jord (2011-10-18 10:04:00)
flaming members isn't contributing. removing teds for a month may be a bit harsh, but maybe that's what he needs to return to positively contributing.
anyway, let's move on from teds ban
anyway, let's move on from teds ban
No but that wasn't the entirety of his posts, and flaming happens everyday, 10 times a day.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
flaming members isn't contributing.
He didn't leave (like he ever would) He told OH to trip and fall onto a cock or something along those lines after being temped twice and limited.Miggle wrote:
I think they did it marine too and he left.
And hurri IIRC
OH perm'd him right there.
Last edited by m3thod (2011-10-18 16:31:13)
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
No I didn't ... I did not perm ban Marine ... but, I did put him on a limited account.m3thod wrote:
He didn't leave (like he ever would) He told OH to trip and fall onto a cock or something along those lines after being temped twice and limited.Miggle wrote:
I think they did it marine too and he left.
And hurri IIRC
OH perm'd him right there.
At least he's getting out of the house more.
Русский военный корабль, иди на хуй!
it was varegg. i couldnt be arsed to edit my post.OrangeHound wrote:
No I didn't ... I did not perm ban Marine ... but, I did put him on a limited account.m3thod wrote:
He didn't leave (like he ever would) He told OH to trip and fall onto a cock or something along those lines after being temped twice and limited.Miggle wrote:
I think they did it marine too and he left.
And hurri IIRC
OH perm'd him right there.
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.