Canin
Conservative Roman Catholic
+280|6761|Foothills of S. Carolina

JohnG@lt wrote:

Canin wrote:

I already listed one previously, in rebuttle to the Anglican church not having issues, and that was localized to Australia. Every church, school and institution is having problems with child abuse. All you have to do is search google and you can find a plethora of them. I know you are smart enough to do that G@lt, I have read your posts and tend to agree with you on most of them. However, everyone likes to paint the Catholic church with a broad brush when it comes to child abuse being solely its problem and it just is not the case.
I can only go off my own experiences and I happen to live in a densely Catholic part of the country (most of the area is Italian, Irish or southern German) and there have been a lot of problems. The Rockville Center diocese here was hit with a $150M lawsuit, St. Patricks Cathedral in Manhattan had issues etc. Sure, these are a minority of churches in the region but they've gotten a lot of print over the years.
Think about your last sentence, "They've gotten a lot of print over the years." Know of any other religion or institution that has? I don't.

Have a look at this report, it backs up what I am saying. I know, anyone can find anything online to support their POV, however, I just did a google search and took the first one.

http://www.catholicleague.org/research/ … ontext.htm


edit: Ok, so I lied, I took the third one, only because I don't entirely trust wikipedia and the second link wasn't trusted by my protection programs.

Last edited by Canin (2010-03-14 19:36:30)

Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|7002
One thing why a lot of priests went to protestantism during the 1600s was because they could fuck.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,817|6392|eXtreme to the maX
OP:

No, the Catholic church is a handy honey-pot for pedos and nutballs, leave them be.
Think of it as fly-paper for perverts.
Fuck Israel
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6731|The Land of Scott Walker

Turquoise wrote:

Let them marry...  that will fix a myriad of problems all by itself.
This ... and there's nothing in the Bible that supports a mandate of the single life for leadership of the church.
Pug
UR father's brother's nephew's former roommate
+652|6828|Texas - Bigger than France
God wants you to give me a BJ
jamiecracker
Member
+17|7033|Wollongong,Australia
http://compassreview.org/spring09/6.pdf

http://brokenrites.alphalink.com.au/nle … crime.html

Iam not saying that other religions dont have similar problems it is just that the catholic church seems to be alot worse and yes Iam only going on what I have read and what the media feeds us.
11 Bravo
Banned
+965|5523|Cleveland, Ohio
i blame the people in this world for the chruches indiscretions.  if people would stop believing in santa and the man in the clouds then all would be well.  but no, we placate these pee pee touching cunts and keep them employed.  good job guys.  way to contribute to the pedos of the world.  your hands are as dirty as theirs.
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,817|6392|eXtreme to the maX

11 Bravo wrote:

i blame the people in this world for the chruches indiscretions.  if people would stop believing in santa and the man in the clouds then all would be well.  but no, we placate these pee pee touching cunts and keep them employed.  good job guys.  way to contribute to the pedos of the world.  your hands are as dirty as theirs.
Kind of, all organisations which wield power over others attract screwballs who want to wield it for their own evil purposes.
Might as well try to ban organisations.

Organised church based religion of all types does seem to be BS with no exceptions I can think of.
Fuck Israel
Shahter
Zee Ruskie
+295|7061|Moscow, Russia

Canin wrote:

It is a religion, one which I follow and believe in. I find it humorous that those here that have shown to have no faith in anything are the ones that like to pick at the Faith of others. Its almost as if you can't find yours so you have to belittle others to bring them down to your level.
nobody "who have shown to have no faith in anything" would pick on your pesonal faith in their right mind - that would be like blind men talking about lights and colors. what's being discussed here is catholic chirch - a religious organisation - and... emm... ridiculously outdated dogma it still sticks to even at this day and age. you understand the difference, don't you?
if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
Ticia
Member
+73|5621

Canin wrote:

As for the OP

No, and I think you meant Celibacy. And even at that, no. A Catholic priest is married to the church, and is to remain celibate so as to better serve God.
That made sense in the past when being a family man was incompatible with travelling around spreading God's word.
I don't even think it had much to do with sex itself but more with the fact that back in the day a man was the provider for his family therefore his dedication to priesthood would take second place.   
Nowdays it would be better for them to have the choice. And while they're at it open the door to women priests too.
Eventually they will have to in order to survive.
Canin
Conservative Roman Catholic
+280|6761|Foothills of S. Carolina

Shahter wrote:

Canin wrote:

It is a religion, one which I follow and believe in. I find it humorous that those here that have shown to have no faith in anything are the ones that like to pick at the Faith of others. Its almost as if you can't find yours so you have to belittle others to bring them down to your level.
nobody "who have shown to have no faith in anything" would pick on your pesonal faith in their right mind - that would be like blind men talking about lights and colors. what's being discussed here is catholic chirch - a religious organisation - and... emm... ridiculously outdated dogma it still sticks to even at this day and age. you understand the difference, don't you?
I know the difference between picking on me and picking against the Faith I believe in. I never said anyone was picking on me personally, I said those with no faith like to bring those with faith or belief in a religion down. For so many here to not believe in God or religion, there are way too many complaints and general whining about it. If you don't care for it, then let it be. Those of us that do follow or believe are never the ones that try to bring religion into this forum.
Marlo Stanfield
online poker tax cheating
+122|5449
lol Catholics
Shahter
Zee Ruskie
+295|7061|Moscow, Russia

Canin wrote:

Shahter wrote:

Canin wrote:

It is a religion, one which I follow and believe in. I find it humorous that those here that have shown to have no faith in anything are the ones that like to pick at the Faith of others. Its almost as if you can't find yours so you have to belittle others to bring them down to your level.
nobody "who have shown to have no faith in anything" would pick on your pesonal faith in their right mind - that would be like blind men talking about lights and colors. what's being discussed here is catholic chirch - a religious organisation - and... emm... ridiculously outdated dogma it still sticks to even at this day and age. you understand the difference, don't you?
I know the difference between picking on me and picking against the Faith I believe in. I never said anyone was picking on me personally, I said those with no faith like to bring those with faith or belief in a religion down. For so many here to not believe in God or religion, there are way too many complaints and general whining about it. If you don't care for it, then let it be. Those of us that do follow or believe are never the ones that try to bring religion into this forum.
no, you obviously do not understand the difference between religious faith and organized religion as a socious construct.

ones faith, as i understand it, is something personal. it cannot be measured, brought to comparison with others, or even communicated to another person - there's just to known way to do so. simply put, you never know if any others' faith is the same as yours - there isn't and can never be no universal "faith to beleave in", because, unlike what some would tell to you, faith cannot be written in a book, it doesn't walk around in fancy clothes, and it cannot be agreed upon - that's what ultimately makes it so destructive: as long as people keep bringing this part of themselves to others there will always be unresolvable conflicts.

and this is were we come to organized religion. some would say that its purpose is to unify people in their faith (cannot be done for the reasons i mentioned above), others that its goal is to research that metaphysical "spiritual part of the world" and try to rationalize it for everybody (equally pointless endeavor). to me it is exceedingly obvious that the sole purpose of religious organisations is the same as all others' - influence, power and profit, and catholic church would be one hell of an example of that - it is, hands down, THE most successfull transnational fucking corporation there ever was.

now, this organisation and its ridiculous medieval ways is what's being discussed here, religious dogma of cathoic church is what's being attacked. but it has nothing to do with your personal faith, because nobody but yourself knows what it is.
if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
Ioan92
Member
+337|6008

Mekstizzle wrote:

If God created Adam and Eve, who was created by Adam and Eve... and who did they procreate with?

On topic, Priests know what they're getting into when they join up, if they can't do it then just leave. It's about devotion. And nobody is forcing them to do anything.
Cain and Abel?
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|7002

Ioan92 wrote:

Mekstizzle wrote:

If God created Adam and Eve, who was created by Adam and Eve... and who did they procreate with?

On topic, Priests know what they're getting into when they join up, if they can't do it then just leave. It's about devotion. And nobody is forcing them to do anything.
Cain and Abel?
wincest
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|6907|London, England

Ioan92 wrote:

Mekstizzle wrote:

If God created Adam and Eve, who was created by Adam and Eve... and who did they procreate with?

On topic, Priests know what they're getting into when they join up, if they can't do it then just leave. It's about devotion. And nobody is forcing them to do anything.
Cain and Abel?
So they had two sons, ok. How the fuck did humanity go onwards from there then? Massive holes in the plot, brah
jord
Member
+2,382|6964|The North, beyond the wall.
The catholic church should remove itself from the planet.
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6867|SE London

Canin wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Canin wrote:

As for the OP

No, and I think you meant Celibacy. And even at that, no. A Catholic priest is married to the church, and is to remain celibate so as to better serve God.

If you are asking this question due to the abuse scandals, keep in mind that the scandals are prevalent in more than the Catholic church, yet only the Catholic churches require celibacy. Search google for any other denomination and sexual abuse and you will find just as many cases of it, only not as widely newsworthy because the Catholic church is a larger target.
You're still dodging the fact that celibacy makes no sense whatsoever to expect out of a human being for the entirety of his life.  Biology, in and of itself, requires that we sate our sexual urges -- whether through marriage, masturbation, or otherwise.

And then of course, there's the fact that the only reason this was really put into place was because of politics and nepotism, it's clearly a very outdated rule.

Logically, it really cannot be defended.  Then again, neither can the stereotypical Catholic view of contraception.
I am not dodging anything, Celibacy is required for those in the priesthood. You don't want to or can't be celibate, then you don't become a priest. In the Catholic church being a priest is a calling, its not for everyone. It is mandated by Catholic Law.

I don't know why those who are not Catholic even care so much. Again, if it is due to the abuse scandal, best to look at humanity as a whole, rather than pin point one religion, as it is a farther reaching issue.
Of course it is due to abuse.

Catholic priests are, by a long margin, the single most likely group to abuse children in a number of western countries for which such data is available. The biggest distinction between Catholic priests and other Christian members of clergy is the issue of celibacy.

Why is it that Catholic priests are more prone to abusing children? Taking in to consideration the facts above, it is highly probable that being celibate and not having the opportunity for normal sexual relationships has increased the likelihood of Catholic priests abusing children. If that is the case, which everything suggests it is, then society has a duty to care about this and potentially a responsibility to enact legislation banning the enforcement of celibacy on any groups by employers.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard