Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6867|SE London

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

Everyone in the US files tax returns?

Crazy. I've only ever filed one tax return. PAYE FTW.
We have the same type of system more or less.  But there are deductions and withholdings in addition to the deductions automatically taken out of most people's paychecks.  Sometimes we get a chunk of our withholdings back, sometimes we have to pay a little extra, depending on certain parameters that might change throughout the year (children, loss of job, house purchases, marraige, etc).
But do the majority of people file tax returns? Over here I'm sure they don't. I had to last year so I could claim loads of stuff back, but usually I don't. I'll have to next year as well since I've been self employed for half of this year.

Surely it's more efficient to have as few people as possible filing tax returns and to have a system that deals with the entirety of most peoples income taxation?
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5644|London, England

Bertster7 wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

Everyone in the US files tax returns?

Crazy. I've only ever filed one tax return. PAYE FTW.
We have the same type of system more or less.  But there are deductions and withholdings in addition to the deductions automatically taken out of most people's paychecks.  Sometimes we get a chunk of our withholdings back, sometimes we have to pay a little extra, depending on certain parameters that might change throughout the year (children, loss of job, house purchases, marraige, etc).
But do the majority of people file tax returns? Over here I'm sure they don't. I had to last year so I could claim loads of stuff back, but usually I don't. I'll have to next year as well since I've been self employed for half of this year.

Surely it's more efficient to have as few people as possible filing tax returns and to have a system that deals with the entirety of most peoples income taxation?
Yes, everyone that has taxable income is required to file a return.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6867|SE London

JohnG@lt wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:


We have the same type of system more or less.  But there are deductions and withholdings in addition to the deductions automatically taken out of most people's paychecks.  Sometimes we get a chunk of our withholdings back, sometimes we have to pay a little extra, depending on certain parameters that might change throughout the year (children, loss of job, house purchases, marraige, etc).
But do the majority of people file tax returns? Over here I'm sure they don't. I had to last year so I could claim loads of stuff back, but usually I don't. I'll have to next year as well since I've been self employed for half of this year.

Surely it's more efficient to have as few people as possible filing tax returns and to have a system that deals with the entirety of most peoples income taxation?
Yes, everyone that has taxable income is required to file a return.
Doesn't that cost the government lots of money?
Hurricane2k9
Pendulous Sweaty Balls
+1,538|5988|College Park, MD

JohnG@lt wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:


We have the same type of system more or less.  But there are deductions and withholdings in addition to the deductions automatically taken out of most people's paychecks.  Sometimes we get a chunk of our withholdings back, sometimes we have to pay a little extra, depending on certain parameters that might change throughout the year (children, loss of job, house purchases, marraige, etc).
But do the majority of people file tax returns? Over here I'm sure they don't. I had to last year so I could claim loads of stuff back, but usually I don't. I'll have to next year as well since I've been self employed for half of this year.

Surely it's more efficient to have as few people as possible filing tax returns and to have a system that deals with the entirety of most peoples income taxation?
Yes, everyone that has taxable income is required to file a return.
What if my pay was automatically withheld? I filed my return on Saturday, and I got zero bucks back from the Feds even though I only made like 500 dollars, and there was some problem filing my state return and it said I need to mail it in, which is a fucking pain in the ass when they calculated I'd only get $1 back from Maryland.

I don't see the point in filing if they already have your money and they're not giving any back.
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/36793/marylandsig.jpg
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5644|London, England

Bertster7 wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:


But do the majority of people file tax returns? Over here I'm sure they don't. I had to last year so I could claim loads of stuff back, but usually I don't. I'll have to next year as well since I've been self employed for half of this year.

Surely it's more efficient to have as few people as possible filing tax returns and to have a system that deals with the entirety of most peoples income taxation?
Yes, everyone that has taxable income is required to file a return.
Doesn't that cost the government lots of money?
It's their own fault for making the tax code so opaque. Between itemized deductions and tax credits and everything else, paying your federal income taxes is not as simple as I made X amount of money this year, my income tax bracket is Y% so I pay X * Y% in taxes equaling Z.

Could be fixed with a simple flat tax of course... which I advocate...

Or you could go the Big Brother route and have a national database that collects and stores everyones information such as marriage status, dependents etc... This, thankfully, isn't really an option in this country
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Hurricane2k9
Pendulous Sweaty Balls
+1,538|5988|College Park, MD
Not to mention I'm a dependent so I don't even qualify for cool shit like those tax credits.
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/36793/marylandsig.jpg
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5644|London, England

Hurricane2k9 wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:


But do the majority of people file tax returns? Over here I'm sure they don't. I had to last year so I could claim loads of stuff back, but usually I don't. I'll have to next year as well since I've been self employed for half of this year.

Surely it's more efficient to have as few people as possible filing tax returns and to have a system that deals with the entirety of most peoples income taxation?
Yes, everyone that has taxable income is required to file a return.
What if my pay was automatically withheld? I filed my return on Saturday, and I got zero bucks back from the Feds even though I only made like 500 dollars, and there was some problem filing my state return and it said I need to mail it in, which is a fucking pain in the ass when they calculated I'd only get $1 back from Maryland.

I don't see the point in filing if they already have your money and they're not giving any back.
You made fuckall in income though. As a student, you're an exception For those working full time, filing a tax return is not a non-option because it will likely get you audited.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Hurricane2k9
Pendulous Sweaty Balls
+1,538|5988|College Park, MD
Oh yeah no kidding I'd just hope that my employer properly withheld income so that I don't end up getting a "SURPRISE YOU OWE MOAR MONEY" notification from TurboTax.
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/36793/marylandsig.jpg
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6867|SE London

JohnG@lt wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:


Yes, everyone that has taxable income is required to file a return.
Doesn't that cost the government lots of money?
It's their own fault for making the tax code so opaque. Between itemized deductions and tax credits and everything else, paying your federal income taxes is not as simple as I made X amount of money this year, my income tax bracket is Y% so I pay X * Y% in taxes equaling Z.

Could be fixed with a simple flat tax of course... which I advocate...

Or you could go the Big Brother route and have a national database that collects and stores everyones information such as marriage status, dependents etc... This, thankfully, isn't really an option in this country
Or could easily be fixed with a bracketed system, without load of extra complications for the average person. Keep the possibility for tax returns to deal with unusual cases but have more tax codes to cover everybody through monthly deductions from your pay.

A flat tax doesn't really make it any easier to implement than a multi tiered system - it's all the additions and deductions that make it complicated. Do away with them for the majority of people and it's easy to implement.

National database storing everyones income related information sounds like an excellent way of doing it.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5644|London, England

Bertster7 wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:


Doesn't that cost the government lots of money?
It's their own fault for making the tax code so opaque. Between itemized deductions and tax credits and everything else, paying your federal income taxes is not as simple as I made X amount of money this year, my income tax bracket is Y% so I pay X * Y% in taxes equaling Z.

Could be fixed with a simple flat tax of course... which I advocate...

Or you could go the Big Brother route and have a national database that collects and stores everyones information such as marriage status, dependents etc... This, thankfully, isn't really an option in this country
Or could easily be fixed with a bracketed system, without load of extra complications for the average person. Keep the possibility for tax returns to deal with unusual cases but have more tax codes to cover everybody through monthly deductions from your pay.

A flat tax doesn't really make it any easier to implement than a multi tiered system - it's all the additions and deductions that make it complicated. Do away with them for the majority of people and it's easy to implement.

National database storing everyones income related information sounds like an excellent way of doing it.
What happens when you get a raise into the next bracket in the middle of the year? What happens if you get married or have a kid? There are thousands of reasons why people file returns and almost everyone has too much withheld during the year and gets a portion of their taxes returned to them.

As far as removing deductions and other things, special interest groups are the ones that have those placed in the tax code by our government. Remove the tax deduction for charitable donations and the charities scream etc.

Lastly, a national database is not an option. We Americans like our government being inefficient and ineffective. It was designed this way in order to maintain our personal liberty.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Shahter
Zee Ruskie
+295|7061|Moscow, Russia

Bertster7 wrote:

A flat tax doesn't really make it any easier to implement than a multi tiered system
but it does provide for that idiotic "american dream", you know. it endorses their idiotic desire to shit diamonds - for that they'd advocate anything.
if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5644|London, England

Shahter wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

A flat tax doesn't really make it any easier to implement than a multi tiered system
but it does provide for that idiotic "american dream", you know. it endorses their idiotic desire to shit diamonds - for that they'd advocate anything.
Jealous that we can dream of being more than a heroin addict dying in government housing? I bet your parents miss the bread lines.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Shahter
Zee Ruskie
+295|7061|Moscow, Russia

JohnG@lt wrote:

Shahter wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

A flat tax doesn't really make it any easier to implement than a multi tiered system
but it does provide for that idiotic "american dream", you know. it endorses their idiotic desire to shit diamonds - for that they'd advocate anything.
Jealous that we can dream of being more than a heroin addict dying in government housing? I bet your parents miss the bread lines.
you knowing nothing but your fucking "dream", man, doesn't make it any less absurd. and the sorry state russia's in these days is in direct result of your fucking californication having been sold here - in the place absolutely incompatible with it.
but i digress. go on, i've a huge popcorn can here, it goes extremely well with this thread.
if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5644|London, England

Shahter wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Shahter wrote:


but it does provide for that idiotic "american dream", you know. it endorses their idiotic desire to shit diamonds - for that they'd advocate anything.
Jealous that we can dream of being more than a heroin addict dying in government housing? I bet your parents miss the bread lines.
you knowing nothing but your fucking "dream", man, doesn't make it any less absurd. and the sorry state russia's in these days is in direct result of your fucking californication having been sold here - in the place absolutely incompatible with it.
but i digress. go on, i've a huge popcorn can here, it goes extremely well with this thread.
The American Dream is simply Hope. People here hope and believe that they can do better in the world than their parents did and many meet that goal. There's nothing more to it than that. It's certainly nothing to spit on.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Pug
UR father's brother's nephew's former roommate
+652|6828|Texas - Bigger than France
Flat tax is nice, 'cept for the part when people complain about losing that deduction or another.  And the fact it screws over the poor.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5644|London, England

Pug wrote:

Flat tax is nice, 'cept for the part when people complain about losing that deduction or another.  And the fact it screws over the poor.
It doesn't screw over the poor, it screws over the politicians who now have many more voices holding them accountable in how they spend that tax money.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6867|SE London

JohnG@lt wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:


It's their own fault for making the tax code so opaque. Between itemized deductions and tax credits and everything else, paying your federal income taxes is not as simple as I made X amount of money this year, my income tax bracket is Y% so I pay X * Y% in taxes equaling Z.

Could be fixed with a simple flat tax of course... which I advocate...

Or you could go the Big Brother route and have a national database that collects and stores everyones information such as marriage status, dependents etc... This, thankfully, isn't really an option in this country
Or could easily be fixed with a bracketed system, without load of extra complications for the average person. Keep the possibility for tax returns to deal with unusual cases but have more tax codes to cover everybody through monthly deductions from your pay.

A flat tax doesn't really make it any easier to implement than a multi tiered system - it's all the additions and deductions that make it complicated. Do away with them for the majority of people and it's easy to implement.

National database storing everyones income related information sounds like an excellent way of doing it.
What happens when you get a raise into the next bracket in the middle of the year? What happens if you get married or have a kid? There are thousands of reasons why people file returns and almost everyone has too much withheld during the year and gets a portion of their taxes returned to them.
Simple. You have the government determining how much tax you should pay, not the employee. Of course you have the opportunity to query or challenge how much you are paying, but it eliminates the need for a tax return for the majority of people. It works. It's the system in place here and it's very simple, easy and effective.

JohnG@lt wrote:

As far as removing deductions and other things, special interest groups are the ones that have those placed in the tax code by our government. Remove the tax deduction for charitable donations and the charities scream etc.
Again, here all of that is calculated automatically. You make the donation, provide your details to the charity and they get the tax you have paid on that money paid to them by the government.

JohnG@lt wrote:

Lastly, a national database is not an option. We Americans like our government being inefficient and ineffective. It was designed this way in order to maintain our personal liberty.
The price you pay for paranoia.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5644|London, England

Bertster7 wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:


Or could easily be fixed with a bracketed system, without load of extra complications for the average person. Keep the possibility for tax returns to deal with unusual cases but have more tax codes to cover everybody through monthly deductions from your pay.

A flat tax doesn't really make it any easier to implement than a multi tiered system - it's all the additions and deductions that make it complicated. Do away with them for the majority of people and it's easy to implement.

National database storing everyones income related information sounds like an excellent way of doing it.
What happens when you get a raise into the next bracket in the middle of the year? What happens if you get married or have a kid? There are thousands of reasons why people file returns and almost everyone has too much withheld during the year and gets a portion of their taxes returned to them.
Simple. You have the government determining how much tax you should pay, not the employee. Of course you have the opportunity to query or challenge how much you are paying, but it eliminates the need for a tax return for the majority of people. It works. It's the system in place here and it's very simple, easy and effective.

JohnG@lt wrote:

As far as removing deductions and other things, special interest groups are the ones that have those placed in the tax code by our government. Remove the tax deduction for charitable donations and the charities scream etc.
Again, here all of that is calculated automatically. You make the donation, provide your details to the charity and they get the tax you have paid on that money paid to them by the government.

JohnG@lt wrote:

Lastly, a national database is not an option. We Americans like our government being inefficient and ineffective. It was designed this way in order to maintain our personal liberty.
The price you pay for paranoia.
It sounds like you enjoy depending on the government, rather than yourself, to sort out your finances. To each his own.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Pug
UR father's brother's nephew's former roommate
+652|6828|Texas - Bigger than France

JohnG@lt wrote:

Pug wrote:

Flat tax is nice, 'cept for the part when people complain about losing that deduction or another.  And the fact it screws over the poor.
It doesn't screw over the poor, it screws over the politicians who now have many more voices holding them accountable in how they spend that tax money.
Yes, because fixing the inflow will always mean the gov't budget will never be impacted by the opinions of those that set the budget?  Yeah right.

So the poor should pay the same tax % as the rich, even though the cost of necessities is the same for everyone?
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5644|London, England

Pug wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Pug wrote:

Flat tax is nice, 'cept for the part when people complain about losing that deduction or another.  And the fact it screws over the poor.
It doesn't screw over the poor, it screws over the politicians who now have many more voices holding them accountable in how they spend that tax money.
Yes, because fixing the inflow will always mean the gov't budget will never be impacted by the opinions of those that set the budget?  Yeah right.

So the poor should pay the same tax % as the rich, even though the cost of necessities is the same for everyone?
You think it's right that 47% of the population pays no taxes? Does a poor person use roads less? Get less benefit from military protection? Get less use out of the FBI or CIA? Receive less SS/Medicare benefits? Receive less benefit from the EPA? Have less/no kids and therefore don't use the school system?

Half this country is currently getting a free ride.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Shahter
Zee Ruskie
+295|7061|Moscow, Russia

JohnG@lt wrote:

Shahter wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Jealous that we can dream of being more than a heroin addict dying in government housing? I bet your parents miss the bread lines.
you knowing nothing but your fucking "dream", man, doesn't make it any less absurd. and the sorry state russia's in these days is in direct result of your fucking californication having been sold here - in the place absolutely incompatible with it.
but i digress. go on, i've a huge popcorn can here, it goes extremely well with this thread.
The American Dream is simply Hope. People here hope and believe that they can do better in the world than their parents did and many meet that goal. There's nothing more to it than that. It's certainly nothing to spit on.
yeah, yeah, i know: superman is american, jesus is american, Hope is american too. your american notion of "better" is also pretty... particular in it's monetary representation.
anyway, i'm sure you won't understand me - i'm actually pretty sure you are incapable of understanding. so, as i said, go on. i... ehh... apologize for derailing this thread.
if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5644|London, England

Shahter wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Shahter wrote:

you knowing nothing but your fucking "dream", man, doesn't make it any less absurd. and the sorry state russia's in these days is in direct result of your fucking californication having been sold here - in the place absolutely incompatible with it.
but i digress. go on, i've a huge popcorn can here, it goes extremely well with this thread.
The American Dream is simply Hope. People here hope and believe that they can do better in the world than their parents did and many meet that goal. There's nothing more to it than that. It's certainly nothing to spit on.
yeah, yeah, i know: superman is american, jesus is american, Hope is american too. your american notion of "better" is also pretty... particular in it's monetary representation.
anyway, i'm sure you won't understand me - i'm actually pretty sure you are incapable of understanding. so, as i said, go on. i... ehh... apologize for derailing this thread.
When have I ever given a rah rah America is the best speech? I haven't. America is the 'land of opportunity' simply because it is a free society without the baggage of social classes. An immigrant who was a total shithead and hated and shunned in his hometown in Europe could take a boat ride here and start a new life without that baggage holding him back. He left his past behind when he came here. If you were a nobleman in Ireland or a dirt poor potato farmer it didn't matter here. That potato farmers offspring has nothing holding him back from attaining the same social status as the former nobleman's brood.

That last sentence right there is the American Dream.

Edit - and you are absolutely correct, I'll never be able to view the world through the eyes of a pessimist. Pessimism is the reserve of the hopeless.

Last edited by JohnG@lt (2010-02-22 12:01:31)

"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6867|SE London

JohnG@lt wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:


What happens when you get a raise into the next bracket in the middle of the year? What happens if you get married or have a kid? There are thousands of reasons why people file returns and almost everyone has too much withheld during the year and gets a portion of their taxes returned to them.
Simple. You have the government determining how much tax you should pay, not the employee. Of course you have the opportunity to query or challenge how much you are paying, but it eliminates the need for a tax return for the majority of people. It works. It's the system in place here and it's very simple, easy and effective.

JohnG@lt wrote:

As far as removing deductions and other things, special interest groups are the ones that have those placed in the tax code by our government. Remove the tax deduction for charitable donations and the charities scream etc.
Again, here all of that is calculated automatically. You make the donation, provide your details to the charity and they get the tax you have paid on that money paid to them by the government.

JohnG@lt wrote:

Lastly, a national database is not an option. We Americans like our government being inefficient and ineffective. It was designed this way in order to maintain our personal liberty.
The price you pay for paranoia.
It sounds like you enjoy depending on the government, rather than yourself, to sort out your finances. To each his own.
How is paying taxes sorting out your finanaces? It's just a necessary expense. Better it be deducted from your pay in the first place than you get it and have to pay it back.

I like systems to be automated and require the bare minimum in human intervention. That's what efficiency is all about in this day and age and to ignore that is silly.
Pug
UR father's brother's nephew's former roommate
+652|6828|Texas - Bigger than France

JohnG@lt wrote:

You think it's right that 47% of the population pays no taxes? Does a poor person use roads less? Get less benefit from military protection? Get less use out of the FBI or CIA? Receive less SS/Medicare benefits? Receive less benefit from the EPA? Have less/no kids and therefore don't use the school system?

Half this country is currently getting a free ride.
1) 47% seems high
2) roads are usually funded by city sales tax, unless you are talking about interstates...then I'd say, yes poor people use the roads less because they don't own a car or can't afford to travel.
3) Benefit from military protection?  Clarify
4) Less use out of the FBI/CIA? Clarify
5) receive less medicare benefits? Are you talking about old people who already paid into the system and now are getting benefits?
6) Less use of the EPA?  Clarify
7) Less/no kids in school system?  Funded by the state taxes, not federal.

I understand why you want it to happen, but until someone comes up with a solution where the minimum standard of living ramps up with same with your income bracket, then as a percentage a flat tax will equate to a larger percentage of tax bite for the poor.
Flaming_Maniac
prince of insufficient light
+2,490|6993|67.222.138.85
Getting as valid a statistical picture as possible of 300 million people is not an easy task. There is a reason why we only do it every 10 years. Leave it to the people who know what they are doing, no need to make the tax system even more difficult to understand than it already is.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard