If you keep checking, I just keep moving the King, becoming an infinity loop.
You could always work the king closer to the rook, diagonally, and eliminate the problem, course it would take about 3-4 turns
Yeah, there's nothing I can do unless you make a mistake. So, white forfeits. New Game:SplinterStrike wrote:
If you keep checking, I just keep moving the King, becoming an infinity loop.
http://www.apronus.com/chess/diagramik. … square.gif
Yeah that's what I thought he would do. Or if I was him, I would move towards the pawns. But if it's just going to be a loop..Canin wrote:
You could always work the king closer to the rook, diagonally, and eliminate the problem, course it would take about 3-4 turns
And I'll play anyone live if they want.
See, I'm actually protecting my pawns with the king.
Your rook can easily escape my king, making it useless to chase you across the board. I can't do much down by my pieces, because they're covered too well. There are still options, but white doesn't have enough material to win it.
Your rook can easily escape my king, making it useless to chase you across the board. I can't do much down by my pieces, because they're covered too well. There are still options, but white doesn't have enough material to win it.
Where is my "you were right Macbeth" karma?Yeah, there's nothing I can do unless you make a mistake. So, white forfeits.
I never said it's impossible for me to win, but I'm not gonna chase his king back and forth endlessly. That's boring. Also, the only other thing I can do is suicide my pawns into you, which I wouldn't do. You should be the attacker.
I can pull one out of my ass as white, using the board we just had.
What could you do? Honestly..
If we're truly calling forfeit, I'll say.
Alright, forfeit for sure. I'm sure you could easily counter whatever I came up with.
You should check from row E, giving white a chance to grab black's knight. Sure, it's covered by the rook, but in 2-3 moves, you can win the piece. A knight and a rook can cover eachother to an extent, but when pressed, especially on such an empty board, you'll lose one. Then it becomes a game of protect the pawn.
So, new game?
Does anyone have a super computer to test this theory?SplinterStrike wrote:
You should check from row E, giving white a chance to grab black's knight. Sure, it's covered by the rook, but in 2-3 moves, you can win the piece. A knight and a rook can cover eachother to an extent, but when pressed, especially on such an empty board, you'll lose one. Then it becomes a game of protect the pawn.
I suppose, but I might retire from this round, let someone else have a go.
Good game my dear sir
Good game my dear sir
Ask Hakei, he'll say the same. Likely be able to in more detail though.Macbeth wrote:
Does anyone have a super computer to test this theory?SplinterStrike wrote:
You should check from row E, giving white a chance to grab black's knight. Sure, it's covered by the rook, but in 2-3 moves, you can win the piece. A knight and a rook can cover eachother to an extent, but when pressed, especially on such an empty board, you'll lose one. Then it becomes a game of protect the pawn.
If we restarted and you played as white and I played as black, you would not win.SplinterStrike wrote:
Ask Hakei, he'll say the same. Likely be able to in more detail though.Macbeth wrote:
Does anyone have a super computer to test this theory?SplinterStrike wrote:
You should check from row E, giving white a chance to grab black's knight. Sure, it's covered by the rook, but in 2-3 moves, you can win the piece. A knight and a rook can cover eachother to an extent, but when pressed, especially on such an empty board, you'll lose one. Then it becomes a game of protect the pawn.
If you say so.HaiBai wrote:
If we restarted and you played as white and I played as black, you would not win.SplinterStrike wrote:
Ask Hakei, he'll say the same. Likely be able to in more detail though.Macbeth wrote:
Does anyone have a super computer to test this theory?
So does anyone want a Tournament?
What are you guys doing. That game is fine, continue.
I'll edit this with a wall of text so you know what I mean.
In fact, no wall of text needed.
There's sufficient material for both sides to win (You can mate with just a King and a Rook). While it's a tough win for white, it's not impossible to pull out a draw or even win this match.
The advantage of Black isn't the end of the world. White still has a fighting chance.
I'll edit this with a wall of text so you know what I mean.
In fact, no wall of text needed.
There's sufficient material for both sides to win (You can mate with just a King and a Rook). While it's a tough win for white, it's not impossible to pull out a draw or even win this match.
The advantage of Black isn't the end of the world. White still has a fighting chance.
Last edited by Hakei (2009-12-18 07:24:43)
It's what I saidHakei wrote:
What are you guys doing. That game is fine, continue.
I'll edit this with a wall of text so you know what I mean.
In fact, no wall of text needed.
There's sufficient material for both sides to win (You can mate with just a King and a Rook). While it's a tough win for white, it's not impossible to pull out a draw or even win this match.
The advantage of Black isn't the end of the world. White still has a fighting chance.
I just left two engines to battle it out over 20 games. 5 were drawn, 9 wins by black and 6 by white.
Game on pl0x.
Game on pl0x.
I knew it!Hakei wrote:
I just left two engines to battle it out over 20 games. 5 were drawn, 9 wins by black and 6 by white.
Game on pl0x.
Make X-meds a full member, for the sake of 15 year old anal gangbang porn watchers everywhere!