BF2S Forums The D&ST Sucks Thread

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Doctor Strangelove wrote:

EE has more actual debate.

In DST, it's just name-calling and raging. People seem to be able to articulate their opinions in a much clearer and less belligerent way in EE.

articulate their opinions about poop

Better than making a shitty rant about a serious thing.

Really, there is no debate, and the only thing serious is the subject matter. Saying that DST is the History channel and EE is Nickelodeon is absurd. Maybe on paper, the comparison is supposed to be as such, but when you start reading the shit that's there, you have to be a fool to believe there is any intelligence or depth to be found.

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

better debates about video games

The qualifiers are important. Good debates about irrelevant stuff or irrelevant debates about good stuff?

edit: $20 says neither of you are still reading the threads after the first pages anyways. There is no way you're actually reading enough of the material for even a half decent sample, and I know you're not reading because you're not participating.

Saying that you know that he's not reading them as he's not participating is a rather unfair view. I personally tend to read most of the topics in D&ST, it doesn't mean I want to post in them though. As Its been said most of D&ST now is just old members being typecast as one thing then desperately trying to say they are not (generally whilst they say something else in another thread that just obliterates their arguments). If it weren't so full of the same old members bickering and bitching against each other just because they historically do not like one another; then myself and others would probably be more active within it.

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

better debates about video games

The qualifiers are important. Good debates about irrelevant stuff or irrelevant debates about good stuff?

edit: $20 says neither of you are still reading the threads after the first pages anyways. There is no way you're actually reading enough of the material for even a half decent sample, and I know you're not reading because you're not participating.

I don't participate because I get enough people attacking my opinions in other titles. The first time I posted in D&ST I got flamed, I'm not going to again. Nonetheless, when EE and Other Titles are slow, I often read D&ST out of boredom.

And you can say that with credibility because I know how long you have been around and how much you do post...I know you usually don't participate. Post, let's say waaaaaaaay over 5x as much, it's clear that when they have something to say they say it. It's not the same personality.

edit: you guys are just playing right in to my first post hahaha

m3thod would know

So was he mountain lion or what? I tried searching for that and various iterations but I couldn't come up with anything.

Noobeater wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

better debates about video games

The qualifiers are important. Good debates about irrelevant stuff or irrelevant debates about good stuff?

edit: $20 says neither of you are still reading the threads after the first pages anyways. There is no way you're actually reading enough of the material for even a half decent sample, and I know you're not reading because you're not participating.

Saying that you know that he's not reading them as he's not participating is a rather unfair view. I personally tend to read most of the topics in D&ST, it doesn't mean I want to post in them though. As Its been said most of D&ST now is just old members being typecast as one thing then desperately trying to say they are not (generally whilst they say something else in another thread that just obliterates their arguments). If it weren't so full of the same old members bickering and bitching against each other just because they historically do not like one another; then myself and others would probably be more active within it.

Well I can say that they aren't reading D&ST because there are some threads (albeit a small portion) where there is actual debate and discussion.  Strangelove's contributions to D&ST are mostly "D&ST suxxors" comments.

This thread should be thread of the year.

m3thod wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

m3thod would know

So was he mountain lion or what? I tried searching for that and various iterations but I couldn't come up with anything.

Don't think so from what i gather

SoB_Cougar
Banned by trig
Revived and renamed cougar
Banned

Returned as Thorax
Banned for going mental at serge.

Don't remember anyone with mountain lion name either.

Temp forums dude.

m3thod wrote:

seymorebutts443 wrote:

m3thod wrote:

Don't think so from what i gather

SoB_Cougar
Banned by trig
Revived and renamed cougar
Banned

Returned as Thorax
Banned for going mental at serge.

Don't remember anyone with mountain lion name either.

Temp forums dude.

do you remember Alex Trebek from the temp forums?! That geezer was a nutter and was the reason i signed up to them...i wanted in on the action.

Was that David.P?

Actually I think it was Ken Jennings, never mind.

Last edited by Miggle (2009-11-24 17:28:51)

Miggle wrote:

m3thod wrote:

seymorebutts443 wrote:

Temp forums dude.

do you remember Alex Trebek from the temp forums?! That geezer was a nutter and was the reason i signed up to them...i wanted in on the action.

Was that David.P?

i can't remember, i keep thinking it was ken jennings.

Miggle wrote:

m3thod wrote:

Miggle wrote:

Was that David.P?

sean connery was david.p

(lol)

Ken was Alex (he had given up the reefer at the time and was taking it out on Deez)

Ah.

Suck it, Trebek.

GG on editing your post after mine m3thod

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

DAST sux0rs

Agreed.

I clearly said it first guys.