And this concludes that bf2 is still the best fps around...which makes me sad
I know fucking karate
it is quite sad, our LAN's always end up back at BF2, regardless of what other games we may ownjustice wrote:
And this concludes that bf2 is still the best fps around...which makes me sad
These guys have at least had a hard time being unbiased what with all the money Activision has drowned them into.mtb0minime wrote:
Besides, it's impossible to be 100% unbiased.
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
why be unbiased when you can have a job instead?DeathUnlimited wrote:
These guys have at least had a hard time being unbiased what with all the money Activision has drowned them into.mtb0minime wrote:
Besides, it's impossible to be 100% unbiased.
Last edited by Miggle (2009-11-10 15:35:07)
Because of a few Metacritic points difference? Please. Metacritic is great for a general perspective of how a game is (i.e if a game has a rating in the 70's, it's probably not going to be great) but I don't see how just because MW2 is beating BF2 by 3 points it makes it the best FPS around. Not to mention, there are only 5 critic reviews in for the PC version... they usually end up with around 50-60 for the PC versions, 100 for the console versions.justice wrote:
And this concludes that bf2 is still the best fps around...which makes me sad
Reminds me of the 360/PS3 fanboys who get all bent out of shape because their exclusive got beat/beat the other console's exclusive by 1 point.
Last edited by Poseidon (2009-11-10 15:45:00)
Who ever takes those reviews seriously anyway?
EDIT: It's a rhetorical question. We all know a bunch of tards take those reviews seriously, who are also the morons who spend the most on buying complete crap.
EDIT: It's a rhetorical question. We all know a bunch of tards take those reviews seriously, who are also the morons who spend the most on buying complete crap.
Last edited by mtb0minime (2009-11-10 15:43:48)
Not only that but people who may have missed the lead up to the game and what IW are guilty of doing to the pc community.mtb0minime wrote:
Who ever takes those reviews seriously anyway?
EDIT: It's a rhetorical question. We all know a bunch of tards take those reviews seriously, who are also the morons who spend the most on buying complete crap.
You'll be browsing game reviews, see how great MW2 is hyped best game ever and order from steam or go buy it only to face a shit gaming experience.
None of the reviews I have seen have be honest, at all.
Well, an 80 for System Shock 2 ismtb0minime wrote:
Who ever takes those reviews seriously anyway?
EDIT: It's a rhetorical question. We all know a bunch of tards take those reviews seriously, who are also the morons who spend the most on buying complete crap.
Yet an 80 for bioshock isThere is only one major criterion System Shock 2 fails to hit. Graphically, it isn't so special.
and bioshock is a solid 4 points above system shock.So BioShock is not a revolutionary game, or even a particularly innovative one; by the time I reached the end, I felt as though I had played a rather standard and predictable first-person shooter.
Though the System shock 2 review is clearly better than the Bioshock review, the Bioshock review gives an equal score. Metacritic scores are about as reliable as a 5 year old xbox 360.
Hopefully, you'll change your mind when BC2 comes. That game will have the destructiveness that was promised in bf2 plus kit customizing.justice wrote:
And this concludes that bf2 is still the best fps around...which makes me sad
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
I'd just like to bring to your attention that MW:2 does not support SLI.
Because consoles only use one gfx card and it is such a cntrl+c cntrl+v port that IW didn't consider dual GFX cards on the pc.
Because consoles only use one gfx card and it is such a cntrl+c cntrl+v port that IW didn't consider dual GFX cards on the pc.
I'm reading the Kotaku review right now. They said single player campaign is on par with MW1 and that it's about the same great length. ...Yesterday I went through the single player campaign of MW1 and finished in less than two hours, and that's goofing around, dying plenty, and watching all the cutscenes
it's not like you'll need them.AussieReaper wrote:
I'd just like to bring to your attention that MW:2 does not support SLI.
Because consoles only use one gfx card and it is such a cntrl+c cntrl+v port that IW didn't consider dual GFX cards on the pc.
Getting 333fps is much harder in one 8800GT than on two.Miggle wrote:
it's not like you'll need them.AussieReaper wrote:
I'd just like to bring to your attention that MW:2 does not support SLI.
Because consoles only use one gfx card and it is such a cntrl+c cntrl+v port that IW didn't consider dual GFX cards on the pc.
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
Whats really sad is that COD2 was one of the first games to support and flaunt SLi....DeathUnlimited wrote:
Getting 333fps is much harder in one 8800GT than on two.Miggle wrote:
it's not like you'll need them.AussieReaper wrote:
I'd just like to bring to your attention that MW:2 does not support SLI.
Because consoles only use one gfx card and it is such a cntrl+c cntrl+v port that IW didn't consider dual GFX cards on the pc.
Well I think we can all safetly eat our words and apologise to IW for making such a ruckus about their decisions. They obviously knew all along what was best for us.
Last edited by Spidery_Yoda (2009-11-11 03:02:00)
no peeking is the killer for me more than anything
all those years of rifle only elitism... wasted
all those years of rifle only elitism... wasted
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Does that 333fps trick still work? Maybe that's the problem then, you guys are always looking for a way to scam your way through shit, whether it's trying to jump to a certain ledge or do something dodgy, there is always something fucking dodgy.DeathUnlimited wrote:
Getting 333fps is much harder in one 8800GT than on two.Miggle wrote:
it's not like you'll need them.AussieReaper wrote:
I'd just like to bring to your attention that MW:2 does not support SLI.
Because consoles only use one gfx card and it is such a cntrl+c cntrl+v port that IW didn't consider dual GFX cards on the pc.
I think the most fair review I've read is this one from GamePlanet - it's pretty much exactly what I thought it would be, (without playing it,) although with added hype-and-dissappoint factor I'd have probably knocked it down another point to a 6.
[Blinking eyes thing]
Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/tzyon
Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/tzyon
Wow, a reviewer who actually played the PC version before writing a review about it.
Yes it does, I lock at 250 most of the time though. You may call it dodgy, I call it knowing the game engine and knowing how to take advantage of it. Knowing the FPS bug and other quake engine bugs like circle/strafe jumping are and have always been parts of being good at said games.Mekstizzle wrote:
Does that 333fps trick still work? Maybe that's the problem then, you guys are always looking for a way to scam your way through shit, whether it's trying to jump to a certain ledge or do something dodgy, there is always something fucking dodgy.DeathUnlimited wrote:
Getting 333fps is much harder in one 8800GT than on two.Miggle wrote:
it's not like you'll need them.
Last edited by DeathUnlimited (2009-11-11 03:55:53)
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
Well there's your problem, you equate being good to being able get an unintended advantage (I'll refrain from saying cheat) because you can't do any better or perhaps don't know any better. You even say it's always been a part of being good at certain games. lol. If you say so.
I'm out of the loop. What happens at 333fps? Does it make you jump further or something?
Last edited by Spidery_Yoda (2009-11-11 04:00:28)
Lol at the gun being zapped down from heaven.Spidery_Yoda wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHsWZp5pWCo#
Well I think we can all safetly eat our words and apologise to IW for making such a ruckus about their decisions. They obviously knew all along what was best for us.
Quake engine has so called fps sweetspots that make you jump higher and make the game run smoother generally. 333 being the best of them (basically all 1000/x numbers are sweetspots). Locking your fps to a sweetspot in CoD games also makes automatic weapons shoot faster and makes your reg better.Spidery_Yoda wrote:
I'm out of the loop. What happens at 333fps? Does it make you jump further or something?
Most certainly not, I just think it's stupid not to use such a built-in advantage. Locking your fps will not make you good at any game you know.Mekstizzle wrote:
Well there's your problem, you equate being good to being able get an unintended advantage (I'll refrain from saying cheat) because you can't do any better or perhaps don't know any better. You even say it's always been a part of being good at certain games. lol. If you say so.
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
See, you just see it as a built in advantage and that it would be stupid not to use it. It's just the way your train of thought goes. You're never going to understand what's wrong about it or how others could see you as an idiot for it.
The fact is, you seem to be able to need advantages such as reaching higher ledges etc.. and having a faster rate of fire than intended because you're probably not good enough to not have such things. It doesn't mean you're better at the game because you know that certain things mean you can jump higher and shoot faster, it's quite the opposite. Any idiot can read a website and find out such information in a few seconds. Doesn't have anything to do with being good about whether you know and use it or not, it's the opposite.
The fact is, you seem to be able to need advantages such as reaching higher ledges etc.. and having a faster rate of fire than intended because you're probably not good enough to not have such things. It doesn't mean you're better at the game because you know that certain things mean you can jump higher and shoot faster, it's quite the opposite. Any idiot can read a website and find out such information in a few seconds. Doesn't have anything to do with being good about whether you know and use it or not, it's the opposite.