Freezer7Pro wrote:
GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
Uzique wrote:
and i can guarantee that iphones/itouch/ipads have WAY more free apps... check your info, dumbass
Ehrm are you seriously saying windows based tablet doesn't have as much free apps as ipad?
I think he's referring to toys that run Android and stuff.
yes... the comparison was for apps as in 'apps' pertaining to iphone/ipad devices... not applications for tablet-devices. gadget-apps.
to seriously compare the current hardware of a mac product to that of existing pc-technology is a bit... misguided, and besides the point. macs are an all-in-one technological solution- a complete purchase, a gadget that you buy and put in your living-room and use... not something you have to be concerned with technically or hardware-wise. as i said, considering macs product-life refresh cycles, their hardware is fine. looking at, say, the imac or the mac pro, which was last updated about 12 months ago... yes, of course, obviously it will not have the latest Nvidia GPU's or the fastest RAM. but it's not a custom-built gaming computer and does not pretend to be - nor does it advertise to that market. apart from being pedantic or overly picky (you have to always bear in mind the PURPOSE of the technology as a product to a consumer... not as a technological marvel in itself) matters... it is thus fair to say that macs hardware is fine at keeping up with and implementing newer technologies. furthermore, to say then that their hardware is "inferior" is a gross exaggeration. im thinking more of the macbooks/mbp's/imacs etc. when discussing this, obviously... i cannot say in all honesty that the 'technology' and hardware in a tablet or a phone is really of any real concern to any real person. you're discussing these things on a gaming/tech-orientated forum... the relative importance of these things is always going to be warped. as i said in an android discussion thread a few weeks back: yes, android is probably faster at certain things, and the apple contender is technically 'inferior'... but by an entirely negligible and slight degree. loading java 0.25s faster is not going to swing any average-joe's consuming decisions.
ta.