Australia has bought about 22 of these. Does anyone know if they are good or not? They look pretty good, and I am sure they do the job pretty well. Does anyone know anything about these.
Aww, I thought it was going to be a tiger attacking a helicopter
Thankfully BF2:EF is not a simulator (This is the Eurocopter). I'm sure it's a great piece of machinery. Expensive as shit though.
I need around tree fiddy.
same thing I thoughtFinray wrote:
Aww, I thought it was going to be a tiger attacking a helicopter
Would rather have Apaches tbh.
It's no Ka -50 or the mother of all attack choppers Mi 24 Hind.
That being said they reportedly handle well, though I believe the tiger was built more for recon/light assault and support purposes rather then laying ground rape like the choppers mentioned above.
They should prove rather useful though as our island has a awful lot of terrain that would require reconnaissance should anyone attempt an invasion.
That being said they reportedly handle well, though I believe the tiger was built more for recon/light assault and support purposes rather then laying ground rape like the choppers mentioned above.
They should prove rather useful though as our island has a awful lot of terrain that would require reconnaissance should anyone attempt an invasion.
Hooch sums it up nicely.
I'd love to fly one of those babies, but I think you'd have to be one of the army's uber good pilots.
I'd love to fly one of those babies, but I think you'd have to be one of the army's uber good pilots.
noice 
Finray wrote:
Aww, I thought it was going to be a tiger attacking a helicopter
15 more years! 15 more years!
CosmoKramer wrote:
same thing I thoughtFinray wrote:
Aww, I thought it was going to be a tiger attacking a helicopter
Finray wrote:
Aww, I thought it was going to be a tiger attacking a helicopter
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
SirSchloppy wrote:
CosmoKramer wrote:
same thing I thoughtFinray wrote:
Aww, I thought it was going to be a tiger attacking a helicopter
Cybargs wrote:
Would rather have Apaches tbh.
You cant go wrong.
I'm sure it is a good chopper but it hasn't proved itself in combat compared to the Apache which has.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
Looks like a light armed but very maneuverable chopper
Its is a Very good chopper. don't listen to all the Americans saying there shit is better
Last edited by GR34 (2009-08-10 13:31:42)
War Man wrote:
I'm sure it is a good chopper but it hasn't proved itself in combat compared to the Apache which has.
> all
YES but KA-52 > KA-50Ioan92 wrote:
http://www.richard-seaman.com/Wallpaper … lock_1.jpgWar Man wrote:
I'm sure it is a good chopper but it hasn't proved itself in combat compared to the Apache which has.
> all
I'm not I'm just agreeing with the above and saying you cant go wrongGR34 wrote:
Its is a Very good chopper. don't listen to all the Americans saying there shit is better
Modern choppers specialize in certain things... The point of engineering were at makes it so one cant be vastly superior
True!GR34 wrote:
YES but KA-52 > KA-50Ioan92 wrote:
http://www.richard-seaman.com/Wallpaper … lock_1.jpgWar Man wrote:
I'm sure it is a good chopper but it hasn't proved itself in combat compared to the Apache which has.
> all
The Tiger was just another failed joint Euro concept as far as I know. Superb quality but overpriced and, due to bureaucracy, already outdated by the time it hit mass production.
I have reservations about any country buying them in this area, but you're sure to have a decent system. Not as proven as the Apache but with more potential as it is newer and lessons learned with the Appache and others have been taken into consideration for the basic design.
I have reservations about any country buying them in this area, but you're sure to have a decent system. Not as proven as the Apache but with more potential as it is newer and lessons learned with the Appache and others have been taken into consideration for the basic design.
KA-52 is a meant to be used in conjunction with KA-50's, not as a stand alone system. Still it does look (even) sweeter and the side by side seats seem to be more comfortable. In any case yes the KA-52/50's own any other (combat) chopper.Ioan92 wrote:
True!GR34 wrote:
YES but KA-52 > KA-50
http://maks.sukhoi.ru/media/photo/maks2 … d1d151.jpg
Rooivalk tbh google it.
not impressed so far (I read Wiki)Macbeth wrote:
Rooivalk tbh google it.
Well so long as they are better than the Sea-Sprite and Sea-King helicopters...
that chopper makes me come every timeIoan92 wrote:
True!GR34 wrote:
YES but KA-52 > KA-50
http://maks.sukhoi.ru/media/photo/maks2 … d1d151.jpg
a seaking helicopter?!AussieReaper wrote:
Well so long as they are better than the Sea-Sprite and Sea-King helicopters...
