That was not a hate page, if you think this, all that tells me is you did not look at it, or read anything from it.Varegg wrote:
Linking from yet another hatepage lowing all your links come the same sort of source, the bias kind ... no wonder you have your views because you are looking for material that only supports your view and you discard the rest ... if you atleast had based your opinion after reading several sources and from both camps I would have understood you better but you don't even try ...lowing wrote:
The point I have been trying to make for years here.
"Don't judge the Muslims that you know by Islam and
don't judge Islam by the Muslims that you know. "
http://thereligionofpeace.com
from the main link
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Muham … u-home.htm
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Pages … s-Play.htm
I love this one.
Have you visited www.islam.com or www.islamicity.com ?
Those are two sites off the top of my head that aren't biased any direction but made for general information of what Islam are all about both for Muslims and the rest of us ...
As for your links,
the first one speaks of no less that 24 battles Muhammad was engaged in, hardly a non-violent individual. and kinda proves me right.
and read through the other and I found something interesting, Not one mention of Sharia Law. Now how can one speak of Islam without acknowledging its own laws? Any guesses as to why a site dedicated to projecting Islam as everything but violent and intolerant would NOT speak of its own laws? How many guesses would you need?
I asked you before to not dismiss the sources, but see if you can argue against the facts presented. IF you can not argue against the facts, all that proves is, like it or not, the sources are correct in its information.
Last edited by lowing (2009-09-03 13:51:13)