Only to have Origin tell you that "lol europe, can't play yet"thepilot91 wrote:
should travel to america buy the game boxed go back home and fell pro and poor...
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
Pages: 1 … 327 328 329 330 331 … 683
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 3 »
- Battlefield 3 - Main Thread
lol yuropaerodynamic wrote:
Don't really get why we get the game 3 days after....
the game was made in europe too...
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
Try reading more than 3 posts up :3m3thod wrote:
the game was made in europe too...
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
americans get to find all the launch-day bugs so the game is better for we superior europeans
true dat.jmsprovan wrote:
americans get to find all the launch-day bugs so the game is better for we superior europeans
they are gonna release a day-1 patch anyways.jmsprovan wrote:
americans get to find all the launch-day bugs so the game is better for we superior europeans
New multiplayer trailer. So stoked!
because that isnt already posted 2 times in the last 2 pages
I hate that distorted theme.
Sorry that I don't study 2 pages of old posts in search of one little video.menzo wrote:
because that isnt already posted 2 times in the last 2 pages
Me too, hard on the ears.Roc18 wrote:
I hate that distorted theme.
Who was the downy that reported that as inappropriate?
i love it.Roc18 wrote:
I hate that distorted theme.
- Superior Mind
- (not macbeth)
- +1,755|6921
I thought of a base jump level years ago. I designed a map of it in paint or powerpoint and posted it somewhere on the internet. They stole it.
What?Macbeth wrote:
Who was the downy that reported that as inappropriate?
"This video or group may contain content that is inappropriate for some users, as determined by the video uploader.Ryan wrote:
What?Macbeth wrote:
Who was the downy that reported that as inappropriate?
To view this video or group, please verify that you are of the appropriate age by signing in or signing up. If you would instead prefer to avoid potentially inappropriate content, consider activating YouTube's Safety Mode."
My bad, EA flagged their own video. You have to sign into youtube in order to view it.
Oh, gotcha. I was thinking, "That didn't come up for me..." but I'm always signed into YouTube.Macbeth wrote:
"This video or group may contain content that is inappropriate for some users, as determined by the video uploader.Ryan wrote:
What?Macbeth wrote:
Who was the downy that reported that as inappropriate?
To view this video or group, please verify that you are of the appropriate age by signing in or signing up. If you would instead prefer to avoid potentially inappropriate content, consider activating YouTube's Safety Mode."
My bad, EA flagged their own video. You have to sign into youtube in order to view it.
Just played a round of BC2
Suddently feel better about not buying BF3
Suddently feel better about not buying BF3
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
That last multiplayer makes it actually look like a "decent" successor to BF2... I think atleast.
You weren't going to buy it anyhow.FloppY_ wrote:
Just played a round of BC2
Suddently feel better about not buying BF3
Not as long as Origin is attached. No.SonderKommando wrote:
You weren't going to buy it anyhow.FloppY_ wrote:
Just played a round of BC2
Suddently feel better about not buying BF3
9/10 BC2 games involves one team getting absolutely bulldozed by the other and if you are not lucky enough to be able to WTJ you are stuck with the lemmings forever...
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
>he only played shitty rush mode in BC2FloppY_ wrote:
Not as long as Origin is attached. No.SonderKommando wrote:
You weren't going to buy it anyhow.FloppY_ wrote:
Just played a round of BC2
Suddently feel better about not buying BF3
9/10 BC2 games involves one team getting absolutely bulldozed by the other and if you are not lucky enough to be able to WTJ you are stuck with the lemmings forever...
>he keeps using ">"s even though this is not 4chanRoc18 wrote:
>he only played shitty rush mode in BC2FloppY_ wrote:
Not as long as Origin is attached. No.SonderKommando wrote:
You weren't going to buy it anyhow.
9/10 BC2 games involves one team getting absolutely bulldozed by the other and if you are not lucky enough to be able to WTJ you are stuck with the lemmings forever...
Anyway, the conquest maps that are in BC2 are infantry combat shitfests that are just as narrow and linear as the RUSH maps... If I wanted that I'd play call of duty, at least it's netcode doesn't cause half my bullets to go straight through the guy I'm shooting at without doing damage to him...
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
Meh I disagree, but that's probably because I use the armor alot lol. I find the best infantry maps to be White Pass, Arica Harbor and Oasis on Conquest. Everything Else I play armor on.FloppY_ wrote:
>he keeps using ">"s even though this is not 4chanRoc18 wrote:
>he only played shitty rush mode in BC2FloppY_ wrote:
Not as long as Origin is attached. No.
9/10 BC2 games involves one team getting absolutely bulldozed by the other and if you are not lucky enough to be able to WTJ you are stuck with the lemmings forever...
Anyway, the conquest maps that are in BC2 are infantry combat shitfests that are just as narrow and linear as the RUSH maps... If I wanted that I'd play call of duty, at least it's netcode doesn't cause half my bullets to go straight through the guy I'm shooting at without doing damage to him...
I never got the feeling that Caspian Border was just a rush map that got a few flags attached, that was always the feeling I got from the BC2 Conquest maps. Maybe this won't be as true for some of the urban maps as I don't see how Metro for instance will translate to Conquest but I remain hopeful.
I get why people might not like BF3, the fact that it isn't built in the same engine alone is always going to make it feel closer to BC2 than BF2 but I think DICE has just about done enough to make it more in line with the "true" Battlefield theme.
This is not to say there aren't some things I'm annoyed about, possible lack of joystick support alone is a real kick in the teeth, four man squads are just lazy copy paste coding and while I have no problem with using Battlelog as a replacement for the in-game server browser (in quite a lot of ways I actually prefer it) I don't like that things like VoIP are being run through it instead of through the server.
I think most of us know that BF3 will not be at the same level as BF2 was way back when but that doesn't mean I'm not pretty excited about it.
I get why people might not like BF3, the fact that it isn't built in the same engine alone is always going to make it feel closer to BC2 than BF2 but I think DICE has just about done enough to make it more in line with the "true" Battlefield theme.
This is not to say there aren't some things I'm annoyed about, possible lack of joystick support alone is a real kick in the teeth, four man squads are just lazy copy paste coding and while I have no problem with using Battlelog as a replacement for the in-game server browser (in quite a lot of ways I actually prefer it) I don't like that things like VoIP are being run through it instead of through the server.
I think most of us know that BF3 will not be at the same level as BF2 was way back when but that doesn't mean I'm not pretty excited about it.
Pages: 1 … 327 328 329 330 331 … 683
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 3 »
- Battlefield 3 - Main Thread