BF2S Forums Battlefield 3 - Main Thread

Camm wrote:

dtacs wrote:

People need to learn their shit before they start assuming factions.

Wow you're a moany little cunt.

And you're a fucking idiot.

Kapeesh?

Doctor Strangelove wrote:

I managed to not buy MW2 without even having to join that group. Guess I'm just more hardcore than you.

I once watched somebody play Call Of Duty 1 next to me in a LAN club.
That's about the most I ever played any Call Of Duty game.

Kampframmer wrote:

I played 1,4,mw2 and blops.
y'all mad?

I played 1, 2, rented 3 for a day, 4, mw2 and blops.

y'all mad?

_{Cuz I am for buying those last 2}

Last edited by RDMC (2011-06-15 02:27:44)

i fucking love the first ringtone

Doctor Strangelove wrote:

It's not needed but it would be more interesting to have a different objective every time. What's more is that having to blow up a different thing would also showcase the destruction better.

Of course it would still take more resources to do, overall it's probably for the best that you'll be killing MCOMs every time, but maybe in the future it would be nice.

I saw an interview in which they mentioned a co-op mode that apparently takes place in different areas from the SP and MP levels, and includes varying objectives. That's all I know about that though.

42€ for BF3 from ea store. i think i will get it from there..

i got it on amazon.. price will be adjusted to be the lowest at the time of release

dtacs wrote:

Camm wrote:

dtacs wrote:

People need to learn their shit before they start assuming factions.

Wow you're a moany little cunt.

And you're a fucking idiot.

Kapeesh?

BF4 rools OK.

Kapeesh

aerodynamic wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:

dtacs wrote:

And you're a fucking idiot.

Kapeesh?

please don't use that Kapeesh word.
it makes no fucking sense.

ah k

how aboot piss off you wanker?

War Man wrote:

Adams_BJ wrote:

Why mcoms in bf3? I mean i liked rush mode but why not give bf3 something else to attack rather than something from bad company?

Why not? Why would anyone want to give a fuck what they are? You want the game to come later because DICE are trying to come up with something else to blow up in Rush even though it isn't necessary as it has no impact on the game whatsoever?

Sure. Why not give king arthur a pink pegasus to ride and a wand instead of a sword? I mean really he becomes king anyway so does it really matter? yeah I guess it does because those things aren't really in-line with the setting. Sort of like how mcoms are inline with Bad Company but not battlefield. Is it really that hard to reskin it and name it to something else a little more inline with the concept? Is it gonna be the same objective? Ofcourse it is, but it won't take you out of the story and make you feel like you aren't playing BF3 but BC, it will keep you immersed. That's the difference. I thought dice emphasised this was a true sequel to the battlefield franchise not a BC sequel.

This isn't a bitching thing about herp derp BC3 not BF3, it just seems like they could have been creative and come up with something separate between the 2.

11 Bravo wrote:

Adams_BJ wrote:

something separate between the 2.

please understand this is bc3 and not bf3 when it comes down to it

yes I know but reskin it and rename it to a intelligence centre or weapons cache or dildo vending machine or something. anything but mcom surely?