Flecco
iPod is broken.
+1,048|6968|NT, like Mick Dundee

cpt.fass1 wrote:

As I explained to a friend to mine.. If a company is doing poorly and they're having a hard time paying people, they cut from the bottom and work they're way up. Now it's the CEO's and "rich" people job to make sure that the company stays in the black, so when it hits the red why doesn't it affect the income they make first? Instead they salary cut and lay off the people making the honest living, it's all Ass Backwards
Don't CEO's generally get booted if they fuck up?
Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.
cpt.fass1
The Cap'n Can Make it Hap'n
+329|6999|NJ

Flecco wrote:

cpt.fass1 wrote:

As I explained to a friend to mine.. If a company is doing poorly and they're having a hard time paying people, they cut from the bottom and work they're way up. Now it's the CEO's and "rich" people job to make sure that the company stays in the black, so when it hits the red why doesn't it affect the income they make first? Instead they salary cut and lay off the people making the honest living, it's all Ass Backwards
Don't CEO's generally get booted if they fuck up?
Not that I know of and if they do they get a hefty serverance package.. If you have alot of money that means you have a good legal team or good lawyer, so when trying to get these people out it turns to be really costly. Hell if you had a job making more then a million a year salary I"m sure you'd defend it by paying someone 150k a year..
Karbin
Member
+42|6597

Flecco wrote:

cpt.fass1 wrote:

As I explained to a friend to mine.. If a company is doing poorly and they're having a hard time paying people, they cut from the bottom and work they're way up. Now it's the CEO's and "rich" people job to make sure that the company stays in the black, so when it hits the red why doesn't it affect the income they make first? Instead they salary cut and lay off the people making the honest living, it's all Ass Backwards
Don't CEO's generally get booted if they fuck up?
http://finlayongovernance.com/?cat=5  For Wall Street

Home Depot announced the CEO Nardelli resignation on January 3 2007. He walked away with a package worth $210 million.

Nardelli is now the CEO of Cheysler LLC.

Last edited by Karbin (2009-03-11 14:40:05)

Flecco
iPod is broken.
+1,048|6968|NT, like Mick Dundee

Karbin wrote:

Flecco wrote:

cpt.fass1 wrote:

As I explained to a friend to mine.. If a company is doing poorly and they're having a hard time paying people, they cut from the bottom and work they're way up. Now it's the CEO's and "rich" people job to make sure that the company stays in the black, so when it hits the red why doesn't it affect the income they make first? Instead they salary cut and lay off the people making the honest living, it's all Ass Backwards
Don't CEO's generally get booted if they fuck up?
http://finlayongovernance.com/?cat=5  For Wall Street

Home Depot announced the CEO Nardelli resignation on January 3 2007. He walked away with a package worth $210 million.

Nardelli is now the CEO of Cheysler LLC.
Shit's fucked up in the USA.
Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6954|USA

cpt.fass1 wrote:

lowing wrote:

cpt.fass1 wrote:

It just takes away desire to improve your situation.. If you lived in sub par houseing and were paying little for it would you want to work and improve your situation to pay more for the same housing?

Now if they didn't take away the benefit right away with the improving then it might give people a chance to break the cycle.
Glad we can agree, now put that same logic toward punishing the rich for achieving by taxing them harder for doing so.

The more they achieve the more they have taken away. Sound familiar?  Yet most are all for this, in dealing with the rich, but some how feel it is different for everyone else.

It is undeniable that when the rich are allowed improve their situations it improves all of our situations.
Were as I agree with you on the poor and I think that they need time frames and incentive to improve. Welfare is like crack we need to slowly remove these people from the situation, you can't say ok your situation improved pay us more. Once they're situation improves they should be given time to save a nest egg or at least money to move out. Low income houseing should be low income, and should not increase dramatically the month the people better themself..

The rich is an other situation, when is enough enough, the trickle down effect doesn't work. Power corrupts and with a flooded job market they'll be hireing a work force at a fraction of what the job is worth, making them richer.. The main reason we are at this point is the wealthy has amassed so much weath that the middle man is being cut out.
Sorry, that isn't "fair". Now you are saying it is ok to increase taxes on everyone that has an increase in income EXCEPT the poor. This again is punishment for success.


It is not up to you or me or the govt. to ask how much "enough" is. It is not our govts. job to regulate how much someone should have or how much someone should make. Period.

So trickle down prosperity does not work? ( I disagree) So you wanna now try trickle up poverty? (It has to be trickle up poverty since the poor have no prosperity to trickle up) No thanks.
[F7F7]KiNG_KaDaFFHi
Why walk when you can dance?
+77|6890|sWEEDen

lowing wrote:

[F7F7]KiNG_KaDaFFHi wrote:

The "poor" people I know would definately roof that house.... lowing my friend...you have very twisted views on "poor" people....
Oh I am sure, all of a sudden we all know how the poor would rather roof a house for 100 than be given 50. If that were the case during the booming year of construction there should hve been no one out of work, since Mexicans who do not speak English would vome here and have work in 15 minutes.

Sorry, I call bullshit on your statement.
If you reject 100 bucks for some work and perhaps more work instead of 50 and no more work you are simply stupid or a crackhead. Not Liberal/Democrat/Socialist....learn the differance....

There is a differance between poor, unable and stupid. Any poor sane person wants a job and earn money just like you, howcome you find them soo different and scary? Why would they not have dreams and hopes just because they are poor?


Now....if this socialist darth obama is the tool of the devil....howcome (if i´m correct you didn´t vote) you didn´t do anything to stop him,like voting the other way to start with?

I call bullshit from you in general if you didn´t even vote....too me...if you don´t use your RIGHT to vote, you have no right to complain about the current administration. Did you make use of your vote?
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6954|USA

[F7F7]KiNG_KaDaFFHi wrote:

lowing wrote:

[F7F7]KiNG_KaDaFFHi wrote:

The "poor" people I know would definately roof that house.... lowing my friend...you have very twisted views on "poor" people....
Oh I am sure, all of a sudden we all know how the poor would rather roof a house for 100 than be given 50. If that were the case during the booming year of construction there should hve been no one out of work, since Mexicans who do not speak English would vome here and have work in 15 minutes.

Sorry, I call bullshit on your statement.
If you reject 100 bucks for some work and perhaps more work instead of 50 and no more work you are simply stupid or a crackhead. Not Liberal/Democrat/Socialist....learn the differance....

There is a differance between poor, unable and stupid. Any poor sane person wants a job and earn money just like you, howcome you find them soo different and scary? Why would they not have dreams and hopes just because they are poor?


Now....if this socialist darth obama is the tool of the devil....howcome (if i´m correct you didn´t vote) you didn´t do anything to stop him,like voting the other way to start with?

I call bullshit from you in general if you didn´t even vote....too me...if you don´t use your RIGHT to vote, you have no right to complain about the current administration. Did you make use of your vote?
1. Well most of those you describe love Obama, so you tell me.

2. I know, I wanna be rich and I am not. Does this somehow, entitle me to riches? If I wanna be rich ( which I do) then it is up to me to do things and make decisions that will see me to that end.

3. Nope I didn't make the vote this year, no excuse really, just procrastinated on my absantee ballot. It was some what calculated however, since I knew my home state was not going to go democrat. Basically in this case my vote did not matter.

People that do not vote still have a voice, it says so in the Constitution. Ironically enough, no where in the Constituion does it give you the right to vote.
[F7F7]KiNG_KaDaFFHi
Why walk when you can dance?
+77|6890|sWEEDen
Soo by your definition over 50% of the voters in the US is lazy and never want to work? But still they got off their asses and voted....that must be because they had no jobs to take care of and all the neo-cons had to work twice as hard that day and missed their chance of voting. You must be thinking of leaving the hell you now are in right?

What you fail to see is that socialsm is a tool to even out the different starting points people have in life, it´s not meant to be handouts without conditions, if the goverment "pay" your "salery" some presentations must be done, such as looking for jobs and minimizing your costs. This is how it works over here.


And sure....you have a vioce, but who would listen to it when you couldn´t tell them your point of view with a vote in the first place? You can´t really say I´m wrong about this, if you want some credability behind your political views your first move should be to atleast vote.

On the other hand....I know nothing about you, heck you might do lots of things for your party, I know I try too, I help deliver information on the countryside since the party prefer to save the money on postage and let their voters and activists work and understand their point of views.

Perhaps you do this kind of stuff to, I have no idea.

And I agree....very very ironic that you guys have the right to many many things but still not the must important one.....some democracy huh?
LividBovine
The Year of the Cow!
+175|6683|MN

[F7F7]KiNG_KaDaFFHi wrote:

There is a differance between poor, unable and stupid. Any poor sane person wants a job and earn money just like you, howcome you find them soo different and scary? Why would they not have dreams and hopes just because they are poor?
Have you worked with these poor sane people?  From what frame of reference are you drawing your conclusions?  In my direct experience, they do not want to work, generaly speaking of course.  They are capable of much more than what they are doing.  It is their own choices and work ethic that have put them where they are.  There are numerous ways for them to change their station in life.  They just have to do it.  Nobody is holding them back.  Only themselves.
"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation" - Barack Obama (a freshman senator from Illinios)
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6714|'Murka

m3thod wrote:

lowing wrote:

FatherTed wrote:

Quick question, because i don't know;

Do you have council housing in America?
If there is, I have not heard of it. I am not familiar with that term, anyway.
The Projects? 

Homes provided by the state/local authority on very low rent.  Often shitty quality and infested with trailer trasher or chavs depending on which side of the pond you are.
If they're living in govt housing, then they can't be trailer trash, now can they?

Yes, we have govt housing, as well as govt subsidized housing (two different things).
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
m3thod
All kiiiiiiiiinds of gainz
+2,197|6974|UK

FEOS wrote:

m3thod wrote:

lowing wrote:

If there is, I have not heard of it. I am not familiar with that term, anyway.
The Projects? 

Homes provided by the state/local authority on very low rent.  Often shitty quality and infested with trailer trasher or chavs depending on which side of the pond you are.
If they're living in govt housing, then they can't be trailer trash, now can they?

Yes, we have govt housing, as well as govt subsidized housing (two different things).
You don't have to live in a trailer to be labelled trailer trash anymore.  Get with the times old man.

I was too fucking lazy to go back to edit and correct it.

Last edited by m3thod (2009-03-11 18:50:56)

Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
[F7F7]KiNG_KaDaFFHi
Why walk when you can dance?
+77|6890|sWEEDen

LividBovine wrote:

[F7F7]KiNG_KaDaFFHi wrote:

There is a differance between poor, unable and stupid. Any poor sane person wants a job and earn money just like you, howcome you find them soo different and scary? Why would they not have dreams and hopes just because they are poor?
Have you worked with these poor sane people?  From what frame of reference are you drawing your conclusions?  In my direct experience, they do not want to work, generaly speaking of course.  They are capable of much more than what they are doing.  It is their own choices and work ethic that have put them where they are.  There are numerous ways for them to change their station in life.  They just have to do it.  Nobody is holding them back.  Only themselves.
My own personal experience is the opposite, I know many that struggles and still wont get anywhere.....

Ofcourse many people are capable of much more but some settle for less then others, but this does not mean that everyone with "bad" jobs, low saleries or if unemployed , don´t want to change it. This is where the social welfare programs kick in...they help people achive more with their life, howcome some people are soo hostile against it? The programs help people out but they wont solve all their problems.

And sure...nobody is holding them back, but none is helping them either.....and not everyone has the same starting point in life.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6954|USA

[F7F7]KiNG_KaDaFFHi wrote:

Soo by your definition over 50% of the voters in the US is lazy and never want to work? But still they got off their asses and voted....that must be because they had no jobs to take care of and all the neo-cons had to work twice as hard that day and missed their chance of voting. You must be thinking of leaving the hell you now are in right?

What you fail to see is that socialsm is a tool to even out the different starting points people have in life, it´s not meant to be handouts without conditions, if the goverment "pay" your "salery" some presentations must be done, such as looking for jobs and minimizing your costs. This is how it works over here.


And sure....you have a vioce, but who would listen to it when you couldn´t tell them your point of view with a vote in the first place? You can´t really say I´m wrong about this, if you want some credability behind your political views your first move should be to atleast vote.

On the other hand....I know nothing about you, heck you might do lots of things for your party, I know I try too, I help deliver information on the countryside since the party prefer to save the money on postage and let their voters and activists work and understand their point of views.

Perhaps you do this kind of stuff to, I have no idea.

And I agree....very very ironic that you guys have the right to many many things but still not the must important one.....some democracy huh?
1.Nope, that 50% are made up of those that made themselves "victims" and the rest are made up of those that choose to exploit it for their own gains. Like I said before There is no money and power in forcing people to be self reliant. There are only 2 ways to make money, earn it yourself, or justify entitlement to take it from someone else. By the democrats, forcing poor people into servitude, and dependency on THEM they have ensured power in the govt. The last thing the democrats want are a bunch of people that do not need them.

2. Nope as stated before socialism is a tool used to keep people dependant on govt. The more people are forced to depend on Mother Government the more power govt. has. It really is that simple.

3. As long as we agree that I have a voice, the choice is really yours as to whether or not you wanna listen to it..Apparently you do, and I am flattered.

4. I do not do shit for any political parties, I am not involved in any movements, and I am not secretly plotting to over through the free world.

I have a job, I earned it, I go to work to make money to support my family. I really really suggest everyone else do the same, for I am not interested in supporting everyone else more than what my tax dollars already do. Sorry.
LividBovine
The Year of the Cow!
+175|6683|MN

[F7F7]KiNG_KaDaFFHi wrote:

LividBovine wrote:

[F7F7]KiNG_KaDaFFHi wrote:

There is a differance between poor, unable and stupid. Any poor sane person wants a job and earn money just like you, howcome you find them soo different and scary? Why would they not have dreams and hopes just because they are poor?
Have you worked with these poor sane people?  From what frame of reference are you drawing your conclusions?  In my direct experience, they do not want to work, generaly speaking of course.  They are capable of much more than what they are doing.  It is their own choices and work ethic that have put them where they are.  There are numerous ways for them to change their station in life.  They just have to do it.  Nobody is holding them back.  Only themselves.
My own personal experience is the opposite, I know many that struggles and still wont get anywhere.....

Ofcourse many people are capable of much more but some settle for less then others, but this does not mean that everyone with "bad" jobs, low saleries or if unemployed , don´t want to change it. This is where the social welfare programs kick in...they help people achive more with their life, howcome some people are soo hostile against it? The programs help people out but they wont solve all their problems.

And sure...nobody is holding them back, but none is helping them either.....and not everyone has the same starting point in life.
Seriously look at what is holding them back.  Is it the lack of opportunity or the lack of trying.  Really think hard on that.

I do not agree that most of them want to do better.  That is not the problem.  Most of them are unwilling to actually do better.  The hard work, the shaking off of their old ways and living their life a different way are the things they are unwilling to accept to change their position in life.

Just really think about each one of the ones you know and ask the question, what is stopping them from making more out of their life.
"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation" - Barack Obama (a freshman senator from Illinios)
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6954|USA

LividBovine wrote:

[F7F7]KiNG_KaDaFFHi wrote:

LividBovine wrote:


Have you worked with these poor sane people?  From what frame of reference are you drawing your conclusions?  In my direct experience, they do not want to work, generaly speaking of course.  They are capable of much more than what they are doing.  It is their own choices and work ethic that have put them where they are.  There are numerous ways for them to change their station in life.  They just have to do it.  Nobody is holding them back.  Only themselves.
My own personal experience is the opposite, I know many that struggles and still wont get anywhere.....

Ofcourse many people are capable of much more but some settle for less then others, but this does not mean that everyone with "bad" jobs, low saleries or if unemployed , don´t want to change it. This is where the social welfare programs kick in...they help people achive more with their life, howcome some people are soo hostile against it? The programs help people out but they wont solve all their problems.

And sure...nobody is holding them back, but none is helping them either.....and not everyone has the same starting point in life.
Seriously look at what is holding them back.  Is it the lack of opportunity or the lack of trying.  Really think hard on that.

I do not agree that most of them want to do better.  That is not the problem.  Most of them are unwilling to actually do better.  The hard work, the shaking off of their old ways and living their life a different way are the things they are unwilling to accept to change their position in life.

Just really think about each one of the ones you know and ask the question, what is stopping them from making more out of their life.
This is true, I want to be rich and a professional pilot. I wonder who is holding me back from that.
[F7F7]KiNG_KaDaFFHi
Why walk when you can dance?
+77|6890|sWEEDen
Well in the case of my friends there are several different reasons, one actually has a handicap that results in no jobs, one of them has been poor his entire life and has educated himself his entire life but just had bad timings with the current events of the world, some are caught up in momemt 22´s, no system is perfect, neither is ours....you need a home to get a job, you need a job to get a home and soo on. One is always sorted out because his last name isn´t swedish (just like mine, second generation immigrant). Right now current world events doesn´t really help either hehe.

I really don´t see any freeloaders among my friends, they all had jobs before, payed their taxes then and now they reap what they sow earlier....

My friends does everything in their power to get jobs and get into educations but somethings in life you just can´t controll yourself, I understand what you are saying but in many cases it just isn´t true.


lowing....I still can´t see how you prefer to be controlled by companies that set their own agendas rather then a goverment you can elect yourself?

A goverment protects the majority of the nations interersts, it´s their job, we elected them, it´s their duty to serve us.

The only duty of a company is to make money. Choosing between thoose two...it´s very clear to me. I rather depend on a goverment then companies.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6954|USA

[F7F7]KiNG_KaDaFFHi wrote:

Well in the case of my friends there are several different reasons, one actually has a handicap that results in no jobs, one of them has been poor his entire life and has educated himself his entire life but just had bad timings with the current events of the world, some are caught up in momemt 22´s, no system is perfect, neither is ours....you need a home to get a job, you need a job to get a home and soo on. One is always sorted out because his last name isn´t swedish (just like mine, second generation immigrant). Right now current world events doesn´t really help either hehe.

I really don´t see any freeloaders among my friends, they all had jobs before, payed their taxes then and now they reap what they sow earlier....

My friends does everything in their power to get jobs and get into educations but somethings in life you just can´t controll yourself, I understand what you are saying but in many cases it just isn´t true.


lowing....I still can´t see how you prefer to be controlled by companies that set their own agendas rather then a goverment you can elect yourself?

A goverment protects the majority of the nations interersts, it´s their job, we elected them, it´s their duty to serve us.

The only duty of a company is to make money. Choosing between thoose two...it´s very clear to me. I rather depend on a goverment then companies.
I can quit a company I do not agree with, I can not quit a govt. I do not agree with. I could vote one way and the govt. I do not want might still get elected.

It is the job of our govt. to serve us, but throughout history, never ever has there been a big govt. that was not corrupt and looee sight of its reason for being. The US govt. is no exception.


What is it you expect a company to be in business for, if not to make money? Do you really expect a company to be in business for the sole purpose of paying you? You do realize that govt. does not generate income don't you?

Last edited by lowing (2009-03-12 22:06:38)

Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6977|Canberra, AUS

lowing wrote:

[F7F7]KiNG_KaDaFFHi wrote:

Well in the case of my friends there are several different reasons, one actually has a handicap that results in no jobs, one of them has been poor his entire life and has educated himself his entire life but just had bad timings with the current events of the world, some are caught up in momemt 22´s, no system is perfect, neither is ours....you need a home to get a job, you need a job to get a home and soo on. One is always sorted out because his last name isn´t swedish (just like mine, second generation immigrant). Right now current world events doesn´t really help either hehe.

I really don´t see any freeloaders among my friends, they all had jobs before, payed their taxes then and now they reap what they sow earlier....

My friends does everything in their power to get jobs and get into educations but somethings in life you just can´t controll yourself, I understand what you are saying but in many cases it just isn´t true.


lowing....I still can´t see how you prefer to be controlled by companies that set their own agendas rather then a goverment you can elect yourself?

A goverment protects the majority of the nations interersts, it´s their job, we elected them, it´s their duty to serve us.

The only duty of a company is to make money. Choosing between thoose two...it´s very clear to me. I rather depend on a goverment then companies.
I can quit a company I do not agree with, I can not quit a govt. I do not agree with. I could vote one way and the govt. I do not want might still get elected.

It is the job of our govt. to serve us, but throughout history, never ever has there been a big govt. that was not corrupt and looee sight of its reason for being. The US govt. is no exception.


What is it you expect a company to be in business for, if not to make money? Do you really expect a company to be in business for the sole purpose of paying you? You do realize that govt. does not generate income don't you?
A company is in business to provide a service or product... not to make the owners' rich (that might be why they own the business though)
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6954|USA

Spark wrote:

lowing wrote:

[F7F7]KiNG_KaDaFFHi wrote:

Well in the case of my friends there are several different reasons, one actually has a handicap that results in no jobs, one of them has been poor his entire life and has educated himself his entire life but just had bad timings with the current events of the world, some are caught up in momemt 22´s, no system is perfect, neither is ours....you need a home to get a job, you need a job to get a home and soo on. One is always sorted out because his last name isn´t swedish (just like mine, second generation immigrant). Right now current world events doesn´t really help either hehe.

I really don´t see any freeloaders among my friends, they all had jobs before, payed their taxes then and now they reap what they sow earlier....

My friends does everything in their power to get jobs and get into educations but somethings in life you just can´t controll yourself, I understand what you are saying but in many cases it just isn´t true.


lowing....I still can´t see how you prefer to be controlled by companies that set their own agendas rather then a goverment you can elect yourself?

A goverment protects the majority of the nations interersts, it´s their job, we elected them, it´s their duty to serve us.

The only duty of a company is to make money. Choosing between thoose two...it´s very clear to me. I rather depend on a goverment then companies.
I can quit a company I do not agree with, I can not quit a govt. I do not agree with. I could vote one way and the govt. I do not want might still get elected.

It is the job of our govt. to serve us, but throughout history, never ever has there been a big govt. that was not corrupt and looee sight of its reason for being. The US govt. is no exception.


What is it you expect a company to be in business for, if not to make money? Do you really expect a company to be in business for the sole purpose of paying you? You do realize that govt. does not generate income don't you?
A company is in business to provide a service or product... not to make the owners' rich (that might be why they own the business though)
A company is in business to make money, BY providing goods and services, in the attempt to make the owners or stockholders wealthy. You are high if you think there is any other reason.
[F7F7]KiNG_KaDaFFHi
Why walk when you can dance?
+77|6890|sWEEDen
Why should EVERYTHING we do generate income? Why?

Somethings should be run by the goverment and not greedy leaches, like the postalsystem, healthcare, infrastructure in general actually.

I understand the idea of a company very well, that´s why I rather have a powerful goverment then powerful companies.
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6456|what

[F7F7]KiNG_KaDaFFHi wrote:

Why should EVERYTHING we do generate income? Why?

Somethings should be run by the goverment and not greedy leaches, like the postalsystem, healthcare, infrastructure in general actually.
If a govt. is in the business of making money, it means they are taxing you more than they are spending, also.
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
[F7F7]KiNG_KaDaFFHi
Why walk when you can dance?
+77|6890|sWEEDen
Ofcourse....but this is not the essence and soul of a goverment, but it sure is for a company.
nickb64
formerly from OC (it's EXACTLY like on tv)[truth]
+77|5914|Greatest Nation on Earth(USA)

[F7F7]KiNG_KaDaFFHi wrote:

Why should EVERYTHING we do generate income? Why?

Somethings should be run by the goverment and not greedy leaches, like the postalsystem, healthcare, infrastructure in general actually.

I understand the idea of a company very well, that´s why I rather have a powerful goverment then powerful companies.
Postal Sysytem: recently cut a deal with Time Warner, Inc. to have their shipping rates go up at only 50% of the rate of small publishers, such as Human Events, a Conservative Newsweekly. I see this as something of a backdoor approach to silencing conservative news groups. Not only have they raised costs fo Human Events, they have given Time Warner price cuts for 2 straight years.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6954|USA

[F7F7]KiNG_KaDaFFHi wrote:

Why should EVERYTHING we do generate income? Why?

Somethings should be run by the goverment and not greedy leaches, like the postalsystem, healthcare, infrastructure in general actually.

I understand the idea of a company very well, that´s why I rather have a powerful goverment then powerful companies.
We generate income to cover the costs and give us the opportunity,to enjoy doing all fun shit, that DOES NOT generate income. How hard is that to grasp. Try going on vacation with no money. Try pursuing your favorite hobby with no money. You really need to get real here.
DrunkFace
Germans did 911
+427|6984|Disaster Free Zone

lowing wrote:

[F7F7]KiNG_KaDaFFHi wrote:

Why should EVERYTHING we do generate income? Why?

Somethings should be run by the goverment and not greedy leaches, like the postalsystem, healthcare, infrastructure in general actually.

I understand the idea of a company very well, that´s why I rather have a powerful goverment then powerful companies.
We generate income to cover the costs and give us the opportunity,to enjoy doing all fun shit, that DOES NOT generate income. How hard is that to grasp. Try going on vacation with no money. Try pursuing your favorite hobby with no money. You really need to get real here.
Go back to Germany, you were a much nicer person there.

Why are you always, me me me. Why can't you be more about we. Help your community, and your community will help you. By helping those less fortunate you create a safer environment a nicer environment.  But you also create a larger potential market for your company to grow and increase profits or get a promotion.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard