Radeon X300 Lowest to Maxed settings Incl. FPS

2009-02-26 06:03:19

#1

RookTgz: The Rookie; +8|5540

I thought this would get a rise out of some of you, all rendered on a 17" screen. Shader Model 2.0 GPU

Lowest settings @ 640x480 with 20-40FPS depending on area. Inside Broadcast I get 60+ lol, Downpour I get high -teens.

https://i380.photobucket.com/albums/oo249/Vairus78/CoD4/LowTextLow.jpg

Max settings incl AAx4 1280x1024 - 3fps

https://i380.photobucket.com/albums/oo249/Vairus78/CoD4/Maxed.jpg

I got a Radeon HD 4670 coming in a couple days, will update...the reason for this particular card is it requires no PCI-E 6-pin power connector and is more powerful than the 9500GT (in benchmarks) which also doesn't require a 6-pin PCI-E connector. Its also better than 3850's 1900XT's.

Feel free to pity me. Some karmas will cheer me up JK. But yes, I dont care for graphics too much, I just want those FPS!

Last edited by RookTgz (2009-02-26 06:56:11)

2009-02-26 06:21:25

#2

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|5787|Catherine Black

https://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa178/Funky_Finny/shot0127.jpg

Same spot, same graphics settings, how does that feel?

Also..

https://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa178/Funky_Finny/shot0126.jpg

EDIT:

Code:

[img]http://img518.imageshack.us/img518/5484/lowtextlow.jpg[/img]

To get full size pix.

https://img518.imageshack.us/img518/5484/lowtextlow.jpg

(Or just get a photobucket account )

Last edited by Finray (2009-02-26 06:25:11)

2009-02-26 06:33:56

#3

DUnlimited: got any popo lolo intersting?; +1,160|6462|cuntshitlake

To add, Finray has 4670, so expect a huge buff in fps

main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg

2009-02-26 06:36:18

#4

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|5787|Catherine Black

DeathUnlimited wrote:
To add, Finray has 4670, so expect a huge buff in fps

http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=122013

Finray wrote:
I have a 4670, btw.

Last edited by Finray (2009-02-26 06:36:35)

2009-02-26 06:38:24

#5

RookTgz: The Rookie; +8|5540

This is good news I'm all excited lol.

Also I added img tags only but it still showed up as thumbnails? lol

2009-02-26 06:39:38

#6

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|5787|Catherine Black

RookTgz wrote:
This is good news I'm all excited lol.

Also I added img tags only but it still showed up as thumbnails? lol

Use direct links, so in imageshack click your picture, and when you've got it full size right click > view image, and copy that URL and stick it between img tags.

2009-02-26 06:41:14

#7

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|5787|Catherine Black

330 FPS indoors on high graphics at 1024x768

https://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa178/Funky_Finny/shot0007.jpg

2009-02-26 06:42:23

#8

RookTgz: The Rookie; +8|5540

Uhoh I broke the thumbnails now I cant click to imageshack LOL. I'll fix this

2009-02-26 06:43:35

#9

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|5787|Catherine Black

RookTgz wrote:
Uhoh I broke the thumbnails now I cant click to imageshack LOL. I'll fix this

.... Just get a photobucket account. Free, and much better than Imageshit.

Last edited by Finray (2009-02-26 06:43:54)

2009-02-26 06:48:23

#10

RookTgz: The Rookie; +8|5540

Okay bro Im starting to get impatient, about to call delivery guys to ask whats taking so long...enough screens! lmao

In other forums if you use large URL tags it will open in new window or tab whichever its set to in peoples browsers...right now it opens in same page. Im not sure if BF2S is custom though.

Last edited by RookTgz (2009-02-26 07:01:03)

2009-02-26 07:23:43

#11

NooBesT: Pizzahitler; +873|6468

Finray wrote:
http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa17 … ot0127.jpg

Same spot, same graphics settings, how does that feel?

It makes me feel like you're lying.

There's no AA in that pic.

2009-02-26 07:45:07

#12

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|5787|Catherine Black

NooBesT wrote:
Finray wrote:
http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa17 … ot0127.jpg

Same spot, same graphics settings, how does that feel?
It makes me feel like you're lying.

There's no AA in that pic.

There's none in OP either...

2009-02-26 07:48:43

#13

NooBesT: Pizzahitler; +873|6468

Oh snap.

I thought you had better comp than that Finny.

2009-02-26 08:11:38

#14

RDMC: Enemy Wheelbarrow Spotted..!!; +736|6564|Area 51

Fail resolutions are fail

j/k.

2009-02-26 08:15:34

#15

robcr9: Member; +111|5980

Ye i play with 30/40 fps and still shit all over you, kthxbaiiiiii

2009-02-26 21:06:29

#16

The_Sniper_NM: Official EVGA Fanboy; +94|6113|SC | USA |

Haven't unlocked FPS yet, never thought it was a big deal being stuck at 90 maxxed with AA @ 1680x1050

2009-02-27 07:35:31

#17

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|5787|Catherine Black

The_Sniper_NM wrote:
Haven't unlocked FPS yet, never thought it was a big deal being stuck at 90 maxxed with AA @ 1680x1050

Don't unlock it, lock it at something like 125.

Read this

2009-02-27 07:38:06

#18

Uzique: dasein.; +2,865|6469

Finray, why do you keep bragging about your FPS in every fucking thread? Your card is average-shit, you play on a low-fps config you can download like a fanboy from any team/league website, and ultimately you nerf your game's visual quality into the ground so you can get a miniscule edge over pubnubs. Jeeesh.

CoD4 players are an entirely different breed of suckers from the CoD1/CoD2 days...

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2009-02-27 08:43:23

#19

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|5787|Catherine Black

Uzique wrote:
Finray, why do you keep bragging about your FPS in every fucking thread? Your card is average-shit, you play on a low-fps config you can download like a fanboy from any team/league website, and ultimately you nerf your game's visual quality into the ground so you can get a miniscule edge over pubnubs. Jeeesh.

CoD4 players are an entirely different breed of suckers from the CoD1/CoD2 days...

https://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa178/Funky_Finny/1235604803883.png

2009-02-27 08:54:33

#20

Uzique: dasein.; +2,865|6469

Fail...

u have a shit graphics card
u play for a shit cod4 team
ur shit

_{Awaits next predictable image-retort}

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2009-02-27 08:57:56

#21

Doctor Strangelove: Real Battlefield Veterinarian.; +1,758|6467

Uzique wrote:
Finray, why do you keep bragging about your FPS in every fucking thread? Your card is average-shit, you play on a low-fps config you can download like a fanboy from any team/league website, and ultimately you nerf your game's visual quality into the ground so you can get a miniscule edge over pubnubs. Jeeesh.

CoD4 players are an entirely different breed of suckers from the CoD1/CoD2 days...

I agree with Uzique. I'd rather have the game look 10 times better than me have a 1.00000000000000000001 times chance of killing someone for setting the settings so low.

Anything over 60 will also be redundant.

2009-02-27 09:03:20

#22

Uzique: dasein.; +2,865|6469

DoctaStrangelove wrote:
Uzique wrote:
Finray, why do you keep bragging about your FPS in every fucking thread? Your card is average-shit, you play on a low-fps config you can download like a fanboy from any team/league website, and ultimately you nerf your game's visual quality into the ground so you can get a miniscule edge over pubnubs. Jeeesh.

CoD4 players are an entirely different breed of suckers from the CoD1/CoD2 days...
I agree with Uzique. I'd rather have the game look 10 times better than me have a 1.00000000000000000001 times chance of killing someone for setting the settings so low.

Anything over 60 will also be redundant.

To be fair on the other side of the argument, the modified-Quake engine that the CoD-series runs on does have 'sweet spots', certainly, but they're only really beneficial up to a point, i.e. when you want to be doing special jumps or when you want to achieve maximum ROF for your auto-weapons. I play maxed-out on my system though and can do the jumps using fps-capping and have a fluid rate-of-fire, so these redundant 'brag' pictures of supposed 'uber framerates' achieved using a mid-range card seem pretty silly.

Just seems like an arbitrary and pointless form of elitism/pro-leetness, in my opinion.

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2009-02-27 09:05:03

#23

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|5787|Catherine Black

To be quite honest, I don't care what you two think.

2009-02-27 09:07:48

#24

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|5787|Catherine Black

C'mon Uzi I'm waiting on your grammatically perfectly structured paragraph conveying your opinion that will, in the end, achieve nothing.

2009-02-27 09:17:30

#25

Mint Sauce: Frighteningly average; +780|6285|eng

Uzique wrote:
Fail...

u have a shit graphics card
u play for a shit cod4 team
ur shit

_{Awaits next predictable image-retort}

thx

#rekt

BF2S Forums Radeon X300 Lowest to Maxed settings Incl. FPS

Code:

DeathUnlimited wrote:

Finray wrote:

RookTgz wrote:

RookTgz wrote:

Finray wrote:

NooBesT wrote:

Finray wrote:

The_Sniper_NM wrote:

Uzique wrote:

Uzique wrote:

DoctaStrangelove wrote:

Uzique wrote:

Uzique wrote:

Board footer