Uhhh yup, and the reason we should pause to understand them and appease them isssssssssssss???????????Turquoise wrote:
Why do you think terrorists are so focused on educators? They know what's up...lowing wrote:
Especially when you can't get educated because the terrorists are kidnapping the educators and killing them.Turquoise wrote:
Well, education doesn't solve the problem alone, but it certainly handles a lot of the issue.
I think we should try and understand their motives, but in a way that applies to capturing and killing them. And also... in a way that prevents them from spreading their hate to others.lowing wrote:
Uhhh yup, and the reason we should pause to understand them and appease them isssssssssssss???????????Turquoise wrote:
Why do you think terrorists are so focused on educators? They know what's up...lowing wrote:
Especially when you can't get educated because the terrorists are kidnapping the educators and killing them.
With how many times you keep mentioning appeasement, it seems you might be the one supporting it.lowing wrote:
Uhhh yup, and the reason we should pause to understand them and appease them isssssssssssss???????????Turquoise wrote:
Why do you think terrorists are so focused on educators? They know what's up...lowing wrote:
Especially when you can't get educated because the terrorists are kidnapping the educators and killing them.
Not the opinion of Cameronpoe and his band of merry men, according to them, we need to "understand" them so we can solve their problems so we can all live in peace together. I don't want to live in peace with terrorists.Turquoise wrote:
I think we should try and understand their motives, but in a way that applies to capturing and killing them. And also... in a way that prevents them from spreading their hate to others.lowing wrote:
Uhhh yup, and the reason we should pause to understand them and appease them isssssssssssss???????????Turquoise wrote:
Why do you think terrorists are so focused on educators? They know what's up...
Perhaps, they mean understanding in the sense of righting some of the wrongs we've done that have contributed to the current situation. Like how we helped Saddam rise to power. Granted, now that we've taken him out, that may have been the only good thing to come of Iraq....lowing wrote:
Not the opinion of Cameronpoe and his band of merry men, according to them, we need to "understand" them so we can solve their problems so we can all live in peace together. I don't want to live in peace with terrorists.Turquoise wrote:
I think we should try and understand their motives, but in a way that applies to capturing and killing them. And also... in a way that prevents them from spreading their hate to others.lowing wrote:
Uhhh yup, and the reason we should pause to understand them and appease them isssssssssssss???????????
And that makes you just as bad as them.lowing wrote:
Problem is, I have no interest in moving forward with terrorists.
Well, I will agree with you on one thing. Democrats were cool with JFK getting us into Vietnam. I think it was the biggest mistake a Democrat president has done in recent history.fadedsteve wrote:
The bottom line, is if a Democrat was waging war in Iraq, you libs would be cool with it!!!
The REAL truth is, you liberals still think that Bush is an illigitimite president, hence is making Gore's decisions for him!!
The fact is. . . . lowing is 100% correct and you miserable shit for brains liberals have no LEGITIMATE retort to his questions!!! P E R I O D!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THE VERY SECOND, I purposely kill children, will I be as bad as them....if you want to walk into the future holding hands with child killers, THAT makes you 1 notch lower than terrorists.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
And that makes you just as bad as them.lowing wrote:
Problem is, I have no interest in moving forward with terrorists.
Are you fucking high on drugs???????Scorpion0x17 wrote:
And that makes you just as bad as them.lowing wrote:
Problem is, I have no interest in moving forward with terrorists.
As bad as them. . . .
We fight to preserve our way of life (keep in mind we didnt start 9/11), THEY fight for the perverted glorification of Islam, against the Jews, the values of freedom and democracy, all things WE VALUE and ENJOY ON A DAILY BASIS!!! Keep in mind, they WANT to take these values away FOR GOOD, and put us under a strict code of Sharia law. . . .
Go scratch your Howard Dean sticker off your dorm room door!!!!
Last edited by fadedsteve (2006-11-14 19:19:41)
We are trying to right a wrong. we are trying to rebuild Iraq and their infrastructure. We are being hindered from doing so by child killers.Turquoise wrote:
Perhaps, they mean understanding in the sense of righting some of the wrongs we've done that have contributed to the current situation. Like how we helped Saddam rise to power. Granted, now that we've taken him out, that may have been the only good thing to come of Iraq....lowing wrote:
Not the opinion of Cameronpoe and his band of merry men, according to them, we need to "understand" them so we can solve their problems so we can all live in peace together. I don't want to live in peace with terrorists.Turquoise wrote:
I think we should try and understand their motives, but in a way that applies to capturing and killing them. And also... in a way that prevents them from spreading their hate to others.
It is your total intransigence that makes you just as bad as them.lowing wrote:
THE VERY SECOND, I purposely kill children, will I be as bad as them....if you want to walk into the future holding hands with child killers, THAT makes you 1 notch lower than terrorists.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
And that makes you just as bad as them.lowing wrote:
Problem is, I have no interest in moving forward with terrorists.
Not currently, unless you count caffiene and nicotine.fadedsteve wrote:
Are you fucking high on drugs???????Scorpion0x17 wrote:
And that makes you just as bad as them.lowing wrote:
Problem is, I have no interest in moving forward with terrorists.
And you WANT to take their values away FOR GOOD and put them under a strict western code.fadedsteve wrote:
Keep in mind, they WANT to take these values away FOR GOOD, and put us under a strict code of Sharia law. . . .
1. Who the fuck is Howard Dean?fadedsteve wrote:
Go scratch your Howard Dean sticker off your dorm room door!!!!
2. I graduated 10 years ago.
NO. . . the very fact you think that the terrorists deserve to be recognized as a legitimate group of individuals make YOU as bad as them!! They dont fight under the geneva convention nor are they fighting under one flag as soldiers, they are terrorists and have no moral fiber whatsover.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
It is your total intransigence that makes you just as bad as them.lowing wrote:
THE VERY SECOND, I purposely kill children, will I be as bad as them....if you want to walk into the future holding hands with child killers, THAT makes you 1 notch lower than terrorists.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
And that makes you just as bad as them.
They deserve no quarter, no representation, no sympathy, and no media support! THEY deserve a pine box filled with their dead body buried melting in the desert somewhere!!
They are sadists and deserve to go to allah by gun fire ------------> P E R I O D!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
acually, I was thinking it is your willingness to appease that I found disgusting.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
It is your total intransigence that makes you just as bad as them.lowing wrote:
THE VERY SECOND, I purposely kill children, will I be as bad as them....if you want to walk into the future holding hands with child killers, THAT makes you 1 notch lower than terrorists.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
And that makes you just as bad as them.
what he said.fadedsteve wrote:
NO. . . the very fact you think that the terrorists deserve to be recognized as a legitimate group of individuals make YOU as bad as them!! They dont fight under the geneva convention nor are they fighting under one flag as soldiers, they are terrorists and have no moral fiber whatsover.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
It is your total intransigence that makes you just as bad as them.lowing wrote:
THE VERY SECOND, I purposely kill children, will I be as bad as them....if you want to walk into the future holding hands with child killers, THAT makes you 1 notch lower than terrorists.
They deserve no quarter, no representation, no sympathy, and no media support! THEY deserve a pine box filled with their dead body buried melting in the desert somewhere!!
They are sadists and deserve to go to allah by gun fire ------------> P E R I O D!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I just don't understand why we're willing to throw billions at developing Iraq, but we're letting our own inner cities in America decay... it's crazy...lowing wrote:
We are trying to right a wrong. we are trying to rebuild Iraq and their infrastructure. We are being hindered from doing so by child killers.Turquoise wrote:
Perhaps, they mean understanding in the sense of righting some of the wrongs we've done that have contributed to the current situation. Like how we helped Saddam rise to power. Granted, now that we've taken him out, that may have been the only good thing to come of Iraq....lowing wrote:
Not the opinion of Cameronpoe and his band of merry men, according to them, we need to "understand" them so we can solve their problems so we can all live in peace together. I don't want to live in peace with terrorists.
Last edited by Turquoise (2006-11-14 19:37:22)
No. Just no.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
And that makes you just as bad as them.lowing wrote:
Problem is, I have no interest in moving forward with terrorists.
Man, I about snapped my neck at that sudden shift in direction.Turquoise wrote:
I just don't understand why we're willing to throw billions at developing Iraq, but we're letting our own inner cities in America decay... it's crazy...lowing wrote:
We are trying to right a wrong. we are trying to rebuild Iraq and their infrastructure. We are being hindered from doing so by child killers.Turquoise wrote:
Perhaps, they mean understanding in the sense of righting some of the wrongs we've done that have contributed to the current situation. Like how we helped Saddam rise to power. Granted, now that we've taken him out, that may have been the only good thing to come of Iraq....
actually, I think investers are moving back into the inner cites and renovating them.
Last edited by lowing (2006-11-14 19:42:01)
lol yeah, can you believe that one??ATG wrote:
No. Just no.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
And that makes you just as bad as them.lowing wrote:
Problem is, I have no interest in moving forward with terrorists.
You disgust me. I disgust you. That's fine.lowing wrote:
acually, I was thinking it is your willingness to appease that I found disgusting.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
It is your total intransigence that makes you just as bad as them.lowing wrote:
THE VERY SECOND, I purposely kill children, will I be as bad as them....if you want to walk into the future holding hands with child killers, THAT makes you 1 notch lower than terrorists.
Because we live in democratic countries and have freedom of speech and thought, we are both free to say and think whatever we want.
When we disagree we can debate our points of view and try to reach some kind of consensus. Even if that consensus is nothing more than "We agree to disagree".
That, not wanting to kill those that disagree with you, is the freedom and democracy you supposedly hold so dear.
Last edited by Scorpion0x17 (2006-11-14 19:45:52)
Actually, yes.ATG wrote:
No. Just no.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
And that makes you just as bad as them.lowing wrote:
Problem is, I have no interest in moving forward with terrorists.
But here's the weird thing about all this.. Republicans are typically against any sort of government spending for dealing with poverty over here. Yet, when it comes to Iraq, their approach is actually very Democratic.lowing wrote:
Man, I about snapped my neck at that sudden shift in direction.Turquoise wrote:
I just don't understand why we're willing to throw billions at developing Iraq, but we're letting our own inner cities in America decay... it's crazy...lowing wrote:
We are trying to right a wrong. we are trying to rebuild Iraq and their infrastructure. We are being hindered from doing so by child killers.
actually, I think investers are moving back into the inner cites and renovating them.
Doesn't that strike you as weird?
no not really, but I will save domestic issues for another thread.Turquoise wrote:
But here's the weird thing about all this.. Republicans are typically against any sort of government spending for dealing with poverty over here. Yet, when it comes to Iraq, their approach is actually very Democratic.lowing wrote:
Man, I about snapped my neck at that sudden shift in direction.Turquoise wrote:
I just don't understand why we're willing to throw billions at developing Iraq, but we're letting our own inner cities in America decay... it's crazy...
actually, I think investers are moving back into the inner cites and renovating them.
Doesn't that strike you as weird?
Agreeing to disagree doesn't work too well with terrorists who want us dead. Shooting first works much better.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
You disgust me. I disgust you. That's fine.lowing wrote:
acually, I was thinking it is your willingness to appease that I found disgusting.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
It is your total intransigence that makes you just as bad as them.
Because we live in democratic countries and have freedom of speech and thought, we are both free to say and think whatever we want.
When we disagree we can debate our points of view and try to reach some kind of consensus. Even if that consensus is nothing more than "We agree to disagree".
That, not wanting to kill those that disagree with you, is the freedom and democracy you supposedly hold so dear.
Last edited by Stingray24 (2006-11-14 19:49:23)
Dude, if you think Lowing is in any way on the same level as islamofascist who saw peoples heads off you seriously need to have your head examined.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
Actually, yes.ATG wrote:
No. Just no.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
And that makes you just as bad as them.
Or just stop talking because your sounding rather moronic right now. Sorry.