Oh. My. God.lowing wrote:
I have to draw the line at using abortion as birth control. If you don't want to be pregnant, take the morning after pill.
you know what, time for school.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
Oh. My. God.lowing wrote:
I have to draw the line at using abortion as birth control. If you don't want to be pregnant, take the morning after pill.
Your hypocrisy is outstanding.
You do know what a 'morning after pill' does in order for it to be an effective way of stopping pregnancy don't you?
If not, let me enlighten you.
The 'morning after pill' is a chemical abortion pill.
It stops a fertilized embryo from attaching to the womb wall.
It all depends on when you believe that 'life' begins - is it at implantation (or later)? (In which case it's not an 'abortion') or is it at fertilization? (In which case it is).lowing wrote:
you know what, time for school.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
Oh. My. God.lowing wrote:
I have to draw the line at using abortion as birth control. If you don't want to be pregnant, take the morning after pill.
Your hypocrisy is outstanding.
You do know what a 'morning after pill' does in order for it to be an effective way of stopping pregnancy don't you?
If not, let me enlighten you.
The 'morning after pill' is a chemical abortion pill.
It stops a fertilized embryo from attaching to the womb wall.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_contraception
Your link supports his claim.lowing wrote:
you know what, time for school.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
Oh. My. God.lowing wrote:
I have to draw the line at using abortion as birth control. If you don't want to be pregnant, take the morning after pill.
Your hypocrisy is outstanding.
You do know what a 'morning after pill' does in order for it to be an effective way of stopping pregnancy don't you?
If not, let me enlighten you.
The 'morning after pill' is a chemical abortion pill.
It stops a fertilized embryo from attaching to the womb wall.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_contraception
They can work pre or post-fertilisation.wiki wrote:
"ECs", or "morning-after pill" —are drugs that act both to prevent ovulation or fertilisation, or possibly, post-fertilisation, subsequent implantation of a blastocyst (embryo).
It is all about your point of view. Many pro-lifers, which from the opinions you have expressed is what you are, believe morning-after-pills to be abortifacient.wiki wrote:
ECs are considered for use in occasional cases only, for example in the event of contraceptive failure. Since they act before implantation, they are considered medically and legally to be forms of contraception. Some pro-life groups define pregnancy as beginning with fertilisation, and therefore consider EC to be an abortifacient.
Last edited by lowing (2006-11-05 15:19:38)
No I am not a "pro-lifer" I am not an extremist on this issue, there are reasons for abortions, I just don't think contraception should be one of them.Bertster7 wrote:
Your link supports his claim.lowing wrote:
you know what, time for school.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
Oh. My. God.
Your hypocrisy is outstanding.
You do know what a 'morning after pill' does in order for it to be an effective way of stopping pregnancy don't you?
If not, let me enlighten you.
The 'morning after pill' is a chemical abortion pill.
It stops a fertilized embryo from attaching to the womb wall.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_contraceptionThey can work pre or post-fertilisation.wiki wrote:
"ECs", or "morning-after pill" —are drugs that act both to prevent ovulation or fertilisation, or possibly, post-fertilisation, subsequent implantation of a blastocyst (embryo).It is all about your point of view. Many pro-lifers, which from the opinions you have expressed is what you are, believe morning-after-pills to be abortifacient.wiki wrote:
ECs are considered for use in occasional cases only, for example in the event of contraceptive failure. Since they act before implantation, they are considered medically and legally to be forms of contraception. Some pro-life groups define pregnancy as beginning with fertilisation, and therefore consider EC to be an abortifacient.
lowing wrote:
No I am not a "pro-lifer" I am not an extremist on this issue, there are reasons for abortions, I just don't think contraception should be one of them.
Yes you are. Being pro-life does not automatically denote extremism.dictionary.com wrote:
pro-life /proʊˈlaɪf/
–adjective
opposed to legalized abortion; right-to-life.
your definition would imply absolutes..........I do not make such claimsBertster7 wrote:
lowing wrote:
No I am not a "pro-lifer" I am not an extremist on this issue, there are reasons for abortions, I just don't think contraception should be one of them.Yes you are. Being pro-life does not automatically denote extremism.dictionary.com wrote:
pro-life /proʊˈlaɪf/
–adjective
opposed to legalized abortion; right-to-life.