I'm sorry to say this but i think BF2142 is too futuristic. The reason that BF2 is so good looking is because its graphics look real, the graphics in BF2142 are too much to do with fantasy than reality.
fail
Nah,it's not futuristic enough.
wasn't that kinda the point?? I mean, if it wasn't futuristic, wouldn't it be BF2?
The thing is i just got BF2 in June, and i'd rather stick to realistic games than to go about getting games that look fake.jord wrote:
Nah,it's not futuristic enough.
Stick with it then,alot are.spikes14 wrote:
The thing is i just got BF2 in June, and i'd rather stick to realistic games than to go about getting games that look fake.jord wrote:
Nah,it's not futuristic enough.
OK, cool, you do that. But, uhhhhh.... BF2? Realistic? BAAAHAHAHAHAHA!spikes14 wrote:
The thing is i just got BF2 in June, and i'd rather stick to realistic games than to go about getting games that look fake.jord wrote:
Nah,it's not futuristic enough.
its more realistic than BF2142 from what ive seen of it!bEAv3D wrote:
OK, cool, you do that. But, uhhhhh.... BF2? Realistic? BAAAHAHAHAHAHA!spikes14 wrote:
The thing is i just got BF2 in June, and i'd rather stick to realistic games than to go about getting games that look fake.jord wrote:
Nah,it's not futuristic enough.
Well none of us have been to the year 2142 so we don't know if it's realistic or not do we?
lol!jord wrote:
Well none of us have been to the year 2142 so we don't know if it's realistic or not do we?
i supose you right BUT! it isnt realistic for the time being.
but but but its got real world physics and dynamic lighting!!!!
man, are you honestly that stupid to even post this?
I will never get the minute of my life back that I spent reading this thread.
man, are you honestly that stupid to even post this?
I will never get the minute of my life back that I spent reading this thread.
who asked you?
Where is my lightsaber unlock
imo - I don't think its futuristic enough ... it almost plays like an incomplete thought.
Lightsabers dont exist anymore, Star Wars was in a far distant galaxy, a long long time ago. Or words to that effect, I forgot... But you get the drift.
I would say it is futuristic enough, as otherwise it would just be pretty much the same as BF2. In some degrees it isn't futuristic enough as the guns are even less accurate than bf2 guns, also the US army are planning to start field testing robotic exoskeletons in 2008, so i presume EA expect this venture to fail.
Fail fail UTTERLY FAIL!
What!? You haven't been to the future? I go 2-3 times a week.jord wrote:
Well none of us have been to the year 2142 so we don't know if it's realistic or not do we?
this robot stuff is for kindergarden kids. I rather stick to the slightly less futuristic Bf2.
That's not even the point of 2142. Hence the year 2142?spikes14 wrote:
i supose you right BUT! it isnt realistic for the time being.
Apples and oranges?
jees its set in the year 2142 its not gonna have bow and arrows is it!!
There wont be a future anyways, not the way things are looking now with nukes and all.
fail.
STFU all you "fail" guys, this dude got a point.
Do you really think the world will be as in BF 2142 in 136 years?
I thinks it's too futuristic.
Do you really think the world will be as in BF 2142 in 136 years?
I thinks it's too futuristic.