Read the link I posted above my good man. Read the link. There's a long history with Billy Boy attacking women.JahManRed wrote:
Clinton goes to jail for consensual BJ from a fat chick hardly on a power with rape............. Sounds like you want Sharia Law to me...........
OMG QFE +1 for yaJahManRed wrote:
Well, they have been raping an entire nation for long enough.
Pffff. Read your own link. Excerpts:Ikarti wrote:
Then Reagan should have been too, as well as BushStingray24 wrote:
He didn't ask Juanita Broaddrick. Or the 10+ other women who report sexual assault or rape. If the Israeli president did it, he should be in jail. As should Clinton.doctastrangelove1964 wrote:
At least Clinton asked first.
Reagen: No physical evidence has been produced to support the allegation. No legal action, civil or criminal, was taken against Reagan based on the allegation.
Bush: There was no substantiating evidence for any of her claims. The suit also claimed Bush raped her husband, Christopher. Christopher allegedly served a year in prison after pleading "no contest" to assault charges against his wife. He later filed for divorce.
-1. I think you missed the subtle message in Ikarti's post. Reread and try again.Stingray24 wrote:
Pffff. Read your own link. Excerpts:Ikarti wrote:
Then Reagan should have been too, as well as BushStingray24 wrote:
He didn't ask Juanita Broaddrick. Or the 10+ other women who report sexual assault or rape. If the Israeli president did it, he should be in jail. As should Clinton.
Reagen: No physical evidence has been produced to support the allegation. No legal action, civil or criminal, was taken against Reagan based on the allegation.
Bush: There was no substantiating evidence for any of her claims. The suit also claimed Bush raped her husband, Christopher. Christopher allegedly served a year in prison after pleading "no contest" to assault charges against his wife. He later filed for divorce.
You missed the straight forward message in mine.CameronPoe wrote:
-1. I think you missed the subtle message in Ikarti's post. Reread and try again.Stingray24 wrote:
Pffff. Read your own link. Excerpts:
Reagen: No physical evidence has been produced to support the allegation. No legal action, civil or criminal, was taken against Reagan based on the allegation.
Bush: There was no substantiating evidence for any of her claims. The suit also claimed Bush raped her husband, Christopher. Christopher allegedly served a year in prison after pleading "no contest" to assault charges against his wife. He later filed for divorce.
Schmuck. I would have thought Ikarti was highlighting how all sorts of presidents get crazy nutjobs crying "rape" on them. He doesn't actually believe the claims of the women mentioned in the links provided. He used the link to rebutt the ridiculous claim of rape made against Clinton.Stingray24 wrote:
You missed the straight forward message in mine.CameronPoe wrote:
-1. I think you missed the subtle message in Ikarti's post. Reread and try again.Stingray24 wrote:
Pffff. Read your own link. Excerpts:
Reagen: No physical evidence has been produced to support the allegation. No legal action, civil or criminal, was taken against Reagan based on the allegation.
Bush: There was no substantiating evidence for any of her claims. The suit also claimed Bush raped her husband, Christopher. Christopher allegedly served a year in prison after pleading "no contest" to assault charges against his wife. He later filed for divorce.
Last edited by CameronPoe (2006-10-16 16:24:58)
LOL... Borat, you dog.Bertster7 wrote:
Make sex crime! High five!
Go ahead, call names. I wouldn't expect any different since I dared to point out the true character of your beloved Clinton. It was not one accusation against Clinton and a smear campaign was put in motion wheneven a woman went public. If you don't want to believe the women, fine, say 11 women are lying. One accusation I could dismiss, 10+ should at least make you pause. Especially since we all know Clinton likes his women.CameronPoe wrote:
Schmuck. I would have thought Ikarti was highlighting how all sorts of presidents get crazy nutjobs crying "rape" on them. He doesn't actually believe the claims of the women mentioned in the links provided. He used the link to rebutt the ridiculous claim of rape made against Clinton.
Oh, get off your high horse. The thin air all the way up there is making you loopy.Stingray24 wrote:
Go ahead, call names. I wouldn't expect any different since I dared to point out the true character of your beloved Clinton. It was not one accusation against Clinton and a smear campaign was put in motion wheneven a woman went public. If you don't want to believe the women, fine, say 11 women are lying. One accusation I could dismiss, 10+ should at least make you pause. Especially since we all know Clinton likes his women.CameronPoe wrote:
Schmuck. I would have thought Ikarti was highlighting how all sorts of presidents get crazy nutjobs crying "rape" on them. He doesn't actually believe the claims of the women mentioned in the links provided. He used the link to rebutt the ridiculous claim of rape made against Clinton.
'My beloved Clinton' - LOL - I'm sorry to inform you that I have practically NO love any American politician, no matter what side of the fence they're on... LOLStingray24 wrote:
Go ahead, call names. I wouldn't expect any different since I dared to point out the true character of your beloved Clinton. It was not one accusation against Clinton and a smear campaign was put in motion wheneven a woman went public. If you don't want to believe the women, fine, say 11 women are lying. One accusation I could dismiss, 10+ should at least make you pause. Especially since we all know Clinton likes his women.CameronPoe wrote:
Schmuck. I would have thought Ikarti was highlighting how all sorts of presidents get crazy nutjobs crying "rape" on them. He doesn't actually believe the claims of the women mentioned in the links provided. He used the link to rebutt the ridiculous claim of rape made against Clinton.
Have you ever considered that the opposition sponsor women to come up and falsify claims in order to besmirch somebody's name? No?
Last edited by CameronPoe (2006-10-16 17:21:48)
They sponsor war vets to bad mouth the opposition too.CameronPoe wrote:
'My beloved Clinton' - LOL - I'm sorry to inform you that I have practically NO love any American politician, no matter what side of the fence they're on... LOLStingray24 wrote:
Go ahead, call names. I wouldn't expect any different since I dared to point out the true character of your beloved Clinton. It was not one accusation against Clinton and a smear campaign was put in motion wheneven a woman went public. If you don't want to believe the women, fine, say 11 women are lying. One accusation I could dismiss, 10+ should at least make you pause. Especially since we all know Clinton likes his women.CameronPoe wrote:
Schmuck. I would have thought Ikarti was highlighting how all sorts of presidents get crazy nutjobs crying "rape" on them. He doesn't actually believe the claims of the women mentioned in the links provided. He used the link to rebutt the ridiculous claim of rape made against Clinton.
Have you ever considered that the opposition sponsor women to come up and falsify claims in order to besmirch somebody's name? No?
Dirty Jew
Israeli President Urged to Resign
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15285288/
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15285288/
Other witnesses verified their claims, but you'd say they're lying, too. Of course opponents could sponsor it. But over a 30 year period? Come on. Oh right, I forgot. Clinton has pointed out there is a vast right-wing conspiracy out to get him.CameronPoe wrote:
Have you ever considered that the opposition sponsor women to come up and falsify claims in order to besmirch somebody's name? No?
Last edited by Stingray24 (2006-10-17 09:12:57)
I'm not talking about Clinton specifically - I'm talking generally about all presidents and powerful politicians.Stingray24 wrote:
Other witnesses verified their claims, but you'd say they're lying, too. Of course opponents could sponsor it. But over a 30 year period? Come on. Oh right, I forgot. Clinton has pointed out there is a vast right-wing conspiracy out to get him.CameronPoe wrote:
Have you ever considered that the opposition sponsor women to come up and falsify claims in order to besmirch somebody's name? No?
I wish the Republican party was competent enough to actually host a vast right-wing conspiracy.