To even things up.
I am sorry I can't realy come up with any names right now so just add your own.
I am sorry I can't realy come up with any names right now so just add your own.
Pages: 1
No offence, but you are so not moderate.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
im a left/right moderate
Confession, it's Miller.Miller wrote:
I couldn't say, most of us are wacked in the head to participate in these debates.
I disagree. I would call myself moderate. But again, the problem lies in the definition of moderate. Is it an average of all beliefs, or are all beliefs individually moderate? Or yet different still is it simply a moderation with which you apply your beliefs to others?Bubbalo wrote:
No offence, but you are so not moderate.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
im a left/right moderate
Having said that, nobody here is. Moderates are less likely to bother debating.
Alex Jonesbeerface702 wrote:
and that jackass who started infowars
abso-freakin-lutely. Same reason I haven't nor do I intend to align myself with any religious/spiritual doctrine or sect. I welcome new ideas in every arena but not because I don't have my own. I have very firm beliefs, but enjoy challenging them and being open to new ways of looking at things. In my mind, once you align yourself one way or the other (beyond doing so simply for opposition's sake ... like neo-cons vs. treehugging hippies) you automatically filter and interpret things differently than you otherwise might.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
puck you hit that sucker right on the head. the more i think about it, the more i come to the conclusion that choosing any kind of political idealogy is just stupid, for me that is. I mean, if you are willing to allign your self one way or the other you are already closing off certain doors to ideas or opinions that might not be considered in line with your political affiliation. I am an aplotical, socially prgressive hawk.
Last edited by PuckMercury (2006-10-13 07:34:40)
Pages: 1