BF2S Forums BF3, will it happen, will it happen soon..?

In my personal opinion DICE has milked the franchise dry. I dont see anything that can be a new MAJOR conflict
WW2: done
Vietnam: done
Modern: done
Future: done
Korea is too clase to the others to make it a valid choice. I'm going to guess that after 2142 they are going to start making Ballefield games with different liscences. Or they can make something else and show us all what a one-trick pony they really are.

-[Silver.Inc* wrote:

Pernicious544 wrote:

Or they can make something else and show us all what a one-trick pony they really are.

WW1: not done
1542: not done
0014: not done (jesus vs rest, 64 player jerusalem server, damn crucifix whores)

Make something else? they make the majority of sporting games out there..

loooooooooooooooool at the 0014

Perhaps like in Family Guy, Jesus vs the Romans (with AK-47's).  Yes it will be interesting to see what they do next.  Perhaps something like what they did with BF2, its modern, but a year or two ahead with a semi made up conflict.

It needs: new maps, new guns, new engine, new armies, better gfx and above all it needs to have the good ol' bf2 gameplay we used to love.

bf2 is old now.
whiners killed it.

nerfed everything.

congrats to the nubs.

No it was because you guys used bunny jump to the limit and even more, that's why they took away it. Squad jump was taken away because everyone was using it instead of being in a squad with only 1 leader.

The game was ment to a bit realistic and when half the games come from CS and UT they think bunny jump is normal.

Zukabazuka wrote:

No it was because you guys used bunny jump to the limit and even more, that's why they took away it. Squad jump was taken away because everyone was using it instead of being in a squad with only 1 leader.

The game was ment to a bit realistic and when half the games come from CS and UT they think bunny jump is normal.

If you want realism go play America's Army.

If bf2 was real,

-Planes would be shot down with 1 missile
-Players wouldn't be magically revived/healed
-Support packs would weigh tonnes each, as they even refil tank shells (I think?)
-When close to a wall and prone, you wouldn't be able to magicllay turn around 360 degrees, with your feet going into the wall.
-Going prone and standing up would take alot more time
-Planes wouldnt magically reload/repair when driving over the airfield
-A single wrench wouldn;t repair everything
-Claymores would have more than a mile blast radius
-F35's would own the complete and utter fucking shit out of anything short of a nuke
-You wouldn't magically be outside the tank and then get inside with the touch of a button, and no visible doors etc. Same with choppers/jets
-C4s could be thrown like tennis balls
-You wouldn't magically re-incarnate after 15 seconds
-In turning like you would in bf2 jets, flipping and stuff, you'd blackout in real life = death.
-Entire kits wouldn't magically drop when someone dies, with no animation of the person putting on their kits clothes, etc. You would have to physically strip the person to make it like bf2 does.

Could think of lots more...

You want realism, join the army.

Last edited by -[Silver.Inc* (2006-10-10 05:30:08)

-[Silver.Inc* wrote:

-F35s would be better

don't you mean

"F35's would own the complete and utter fucking shit out of anything short of a nuke"

?

and if this game was more realostic theres no way a t-90 could kill an abrams

Last edited by straz_mataz (2006-10-10 05:30:14)

Back on topic, will BF3 happen?

Yeah I believe it will or Dice is working on another big project, this is from PC-Gamer Sweden:

"Battlefield 3? Rumors are many around the Battlefield franchise future. Many people don't believe 2142 to be a real successor, and are expecting work being done on the REAL number three behind the scenes. After a visit at DICE offices we confirm that large areas were strictly forbidden for us journalists and according to Marcus Nilsson the development team for 2142 only consisted of 80 people, of the company's total of 200. What are the other 120 doing??"

(My own translation, not to be regarded as correct!)

If DICE isn't going back to pinball games this might be a clue?

-[Silver.Inc* wrote:

Zukabazuka wrote:

No it was because you guys used bunny jump to the limit and even more, that's why they took away it. Squad jump was taken away because everyone was using it instead of being in a squad with only 1 leader.

The game was meant to a bit realistic and when half the games come from CS and UT they think bunny jump is normal.

If you want realism go play America's Army.

If bf2 was real,

-Planes would be shot down with 1 missile
-Players wouldn't be magically revived/healed
-Support packs would weigh tonnes each, as they .............
............in real life = death.
-Entire kits wouldn't magically drop when someone dies, with no animation of the person putting on their kits clothes, etc. You would have to physically strip the person to make it like bf2 does.

Could think of lots more...

-Civilians running around.
-Insurgents dressed like civilians
-Bodies and bullet holes wouldn't disappear
-Couldn't jump that high
-walls wouldn't be indestructible
-The M1A1 would be able to simultaneously target 2 enemies.
-Night Vision in SF would be much better. 
-Power lines would bring down helis
-Parachutes wouldn't be solid
-Players wouldn't have parachutes and use them multiple times.
-All weapons would be much more powerful
-No blood or guts/body parts
-You would be able to talk to people around you, not just those in your squad
-You wouldn't be able to lone wolf it. (planned patrols/missions)
-Zip lines are unrealistic

Thats enough for me

You want realism, join the army.

Agree, EA always moved backwards ever since the first patch for bf2 came out. Guess what commander car hack is back in 1.4