He's also spending more on everything in general.ATG wrote:
Bush is funding more liberal programs than Clinton did. The guy has not turned down any spending bills whatsoever. Kinda like the hippy stoner Clinton made the drug laws harsher. Who would have thought?
Well, maybe we'd better keep an eye on Alec Baldwin.UnOriginalNuttah wrote:
And that proves he wasn't a tool of some shady government agency? Confessions of a Dangerous Mind?unnamednewbie13 wrote:
John Wilkes Booth was an actor.UnOriginalNuttah wrote:
Because the only people who ever pull off a presidential assassinations all work for the secret service?
Note that I included the phrase "speech impediment." That doesn't necessarily apply to the internet. Nor, for that matter, does spelling skills (past tense, after having gone through the "peer grading" system, every now and then in high school).Spearhead wrote:
It's the internet. I'm afraid drawing your opinion on liberals you see on the internet will give you bad judgement. Same with neo-cons, I guess. If you actually go out there and meet the educated, well spoken, sane, rational, and patriotic liberals who are working their asses off in the name of justice, you'll get a slightly better picture.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Then how come many liberals (used in relation to opposition of Bush) I argue with either have some sort of minor speech impediment, or can't spell for shit?IRONCHEF wrote:
The opposition to Bush are all educated, well spoken, sane, rational, and patriotic people who prefer law and order.
Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2006-10-08 00:53:30)
No! AREC BARDWIN!
Why do you alwyas have to make comparisons? Clinton is Clinton and Dubya is GWB.ATG wrote:
Puuullleeezzze.sergeriver wrote:
The only reason Dubya is still there is because the Establishment is getting richer, and they don't give a shit for the people in Iraq, Afghanistan or even America.
Its like when Clinton got reelected.
Clinton was an ass but, really, everybody was getting what they wanted so they put up a halfassed guy who has little chance; Bob Dole.
For all the bitching and shit the democrat talk about Bush if they were serious about beating him they wouldn't have put up a buffoon like John Kerry.
Bush is funding more liberal programs than Clinton did. The guy has not turned down any spending bills whatsoever. Kinda like the hippy stoner Clinton made the drug laws harsher. Who would have thought?
You are right a buffoon got almost the same amount of votes than Dubya, so he must be doing bad. If the Dems would have put a true candidate Dubya wouldn't be there right now.
1. Speech impediments have nothing to do with how smart a person is.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Well, maybe we'd better keep an eye on Alec Baldwin.UnOriginalNuttah wrote:
And that proves he wasn't a tool of some shady government agency? Confessions of a Dangerous Mind?unnamednewbie13 wrote:
John Wilkes Booth was an actor.UnOriginalNuttah wrote:
Because the only people who ever pull off a presidential assassinations all work for the secret service?Note that I included the phrase "speech impediment." That doesn't necessarily apply to the internet. Nor, for that matter, does spelling skills (past tense, after having gone through the "peer grading" system, every now and then in high school).Spearhead wrote:
It's the internet. I'm afraid drawing your opinion on liberals you see on the internet will give you bad judgement. Same with neo-cons, I guess. If you actually go out there and meet the educated, well spoken, sane, rational, and patriotic liberals who are working their asses off in the name of justice, you'll get a slightly better picture.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Then how come many liberals (used in relation to opposition of Bush) I argue with either have some sort of minor speech impediment, or can't spell for shit?
2. Depends on where you live. If I went to an all-white town in Louisiana and talked to some people at a Christian school, my view would be pretty biased too.
Did you know...
Prescott Bush was accused of holding nazi funds by Hoover
P Bush started the CIA
Prescott Bush hired Richard Nixon in 1948
G HW Bush was a CIA agent in 1960-63? (lied about that when taking the president's chair)
The anti Cuban army intended to take out castro was funded by the CIA?
Those anti Cubans were equipped with a shipping boat named after Bush's Zapata oil company? Their other boat was named after his wife.. How evident
The same operatives in charge of bay of pigs were also in charge of other clandestine ops?
Bay of pigs and cuban missile crisis, made possible by the cia
Kennedy assassination.
Kennedy Assassination.
Watergate scandal
involvement in or as a victim of every terrorist event in USA since.
Kennedy jr's plane goes 'missing' no black box ever recovered, coincidence? (family vendetta)
pattern?
Prescott Bush was accused of holding nazi funds by Hoover
P Bush started the CIA
Prescott Bush hired Richard Nixon in 1948
G HW Bush was a CIA agent in 1960-63? (lied about that when taking the president's chair)
The anti Cuban army intended to take out castro was funded by the CIA?
Those anti Cubans were equipped with a shipping boat named after Bush's Zapata oil company? Their other boat was named after his wife.. How evident
The same operatives in charge of bay of pigs were also in charge of other clandestine ops?
Bay of pigs and cuban missile crisis, made possible by the cia
Kennedy assassination.
Kennedy Assassination.
Watergate scandal
involvement in or as a victim of every terrorist event in USA since.
Kennedy jr's plane goes 'missing' no black box ever recovered, coincidence? (family vendetta)
pattern?
Last edited by Spumantiii (2006-10-08 14:03:50)
Yes, it's fairly well known that the bush family has a long proud heritage of arms dealing, corporate corruption, and under the counter dealings. Oh, and you can't forget the presidential warmongering.Spumantiii wrote:
Did you know...
Prescott Bush was accused of holding nazi funds by Hoover
P Bush started the CIA
Prescott Bush hired Richard Nixon in 1948
G HW Bush was a CIA agent in 1960-63? (lied about that when taking the president's chair)
The anti Cuban army intended to take out castro was funded by the CIA?
Those anti Cubans were equipped with a shipping boat named after Bush's Zapata oil company? Their other boat was named after his wife.. How evident
The same operatives in charge of bay of pigs were also in charge of other clandestine ops?
Bay of pigs and cuban missile crisis, made possible by the cia
Kennedy assassination.
Kennedy Assassination.
Watergate scandal
involvement in or as a victim of every terrorist event in USA since.
Kennedy jr's plane goes 'missing' no black box ever recovered, coincidence? (family vendetta)
pattern?
Rofl...UnOriginalNuttah wrote:
Because the only people who ever pull off a presidential assassinations all work for the secret service?
Aye, plus Presidents don't drive around in open top cars.Pubic wrote:
Theres probably more security these days than in JFK's day.
I don't know why Al Gore wasn't elected. Seriously, compare him to Bush: He has decent ideologys, mostly about the environment, (better than worrying about non-existant weapons or terrorism,) he was raised on a farm, worked hard, clawed his way up to the top and ran for President. Isn't that they American dream; that everyone can make something of themselves no matter where they start out? Bush on the other hand has had everything freely given to him all his life. I guess that can be considered the new American dream right? 'Hand me the world, I feel I've earned it simply because I'm born into privilage.'
I don't hate America, but I can tell you I'd like it a lot more if Bush wasn't it's leader
[Blinking eyes thing]
Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/tzyon
Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/tzyon
Yeah, Al Gore also invented the internet and is the only politician that knows the "true" dangers of global warming.Ty wrote:
Aye, plus Presidents don't drive around in open top cars.Pubic wrote:
Theres probably more security these days than in JFK's day.
I don't know why Al Gore wasn't elected. Seriously, compare him to Bush: He has decent ideologys, mostly about the environment, (better than worrying about non-existant weapons or terrorism,) he was raised on a farm, worked hard, clawed his way up to the top and ran for President. Isn't that they American dream; that everyone can make something of themselves no matter where they start out? Bush on the other hand has had everything freely given to him all his life. I guess that can be considered the new American dream right? 'Hand me the world, I feel I've earned it simply because I'm born into privilage.'
I don't hate America, but I can tell you I'd like it a lot more if Bush wasn't it's leader
Let's not kid ourselves. There hasn't been a good candidate for President for a long time.
Cue fellatio of Reagan's corpse.Aenima_Eyes wrote:
Yeah, Al Gore also invented the internet and is the only politician that knows the "true" dangers of global warming.Ty wrote:
Aye, plus Presidents don't drive around in open top cars.Pubic wrote:
Theres probably more security these days than in JFK's day.
I don't know why Al Gore wasn't elected. Seriously, compare him to Bush: He has decent ideologys, mostly about the environment, (better than worrying about non-existant weapons or terrorism,) he was raised on a farm, worked hard, clawed his way up to the top and ran for President. Isn't that they American dream; that everyone can make something of themselves no matter where they start out? Bush on the other hand has had everything freely given to him all his life. I guess that can be considered the new American dream right? 'Hand me the world, I feel I've earned it simply because I'm born into privilage.'
I don't hate America, but I can tell you I'd like it a lot more if Bush wasn't it's leader
Let's not kid ourselves. There hasn't been a good candidate for President for a long time.
Al Gore was elected. They stole him back in 2000. In fact he got more votes than Bush, despite the Florida affair.Ty wrote:
Aye, plus Presidents don't drive around in open top cars.Pubic wrote:
Theres probably more security these days than in JFK's day.
I don't know why Al Gore wasn't elected. Seriously, compare him to Bush: He has decent ideologys, mostly about the environment, (better than worrying about non-existant weapons or terrorism,) he was raised on a farm, worked hard, clawed his way up to the top and ran for President. Isn't that they American dream; that everyone can make something of themselves no matter where they start out? Bush on the other hand has had everything freely given to him all his life. I guess that can be considered the new American dream right? 'Hand me the world, I feel I've earned it simply because I'm born into privilage.'
I don't hate America, but I can tell you I'd like it a lot more if Bush wasn't it's leader
REMINDER FOR UK TV VIEWERS
On More 4 in 18 minutes (9pm GMT) - Death of a President
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0853096/
On More 4 in 18 minutes (9pm GMT) - Death of a President
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0853096/
Sounds like BF2iNeedUrFace4Soup wrote:
Some guy threw a hand grenade at him at a speech but it didn't go off.
Found it: http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/07 … index.html
Hate to break this to you, but anyone who becomes president or in a real position of power had stuff handed to them. Look at Presidents and powerful people, they are all a part of Ivy league secret societies and crap like that. I want to say it is the free masons, but I could be way off.Ty wrote:
Bush on the other hand has had everything freely given to him all his life. I guess that can be considered the new American dream right? 'Hand me the world, I feel I've earned it simply because I'm born into privilage.'
Good job thinking about why someone hasn't assassinated our President yet. What if Bush was to do something so monumental to the future history of the universe before it up, but, he was gunned down instead by some hippie? I guess that'd be a good trade off.
We as Americans don't want our Presidents to be assassinated. Just like the English wouldn't want the King or Queen to be taken out. It would hurt the very core of our existence as a country if the people we pick to lead us are murdered because someone doesn't like his views.
We as Americans don't want our Presidents to be assassinated. Just like the English wouldn't want the King or Queen to be taken out. It would hurt the very core of our existence as a country if the people we pick to lead us are murdered because someone doesn't like his views.
How so?Jenkinsbball wrote:
Good job thinking about why someone hasn't assassinated our President yet. What if Bush was to do something so monumental to the future history of the universe before it up, but, he was gunned down instead by some hippie? I guess that'd be a good trade off.
We as Americans don't want our Presidents to be assassinated. Just like the English wouldn't want the King or Queen to be taken out. It would hurt the very core of our existence as a country if the people we pick to lead us are murdered because someone doesn't like his views.
No one has shot him because he's not worth the lead. :p
As people have said Cheney would take over. So think all the killers would, wait until the next house election to see if the Democrates take over house majority. Then the shooting will start. lol. Just a thought.
Everyone is blind to everyone else, its quiet sad. You think the other side is stupid because you won't take the time of day just to listen. Oh well, its not like I can change that. BTW, if you are wondering I'm a liberal war hawk if that makes any sense to any of you.
As people have said Cheney would take over. So think all the killers would, wait until the next house election to see if the Democrates take over house majority. Then the shooting will start. lol. Just a thought.
Everyone is blind to everyone else, its quiet sad. You think the other side is stupid because you won't take the time of day just to listen. Oh well, its not like I can change that. BTW, if you are wondering I'm a liberal war hawk if that makes any sense to any of you.
Stags wrote:
No one has shot him because he's not worth the lead.