Multifarious avenues of approach vie for attention as potential retorts to Ahmadinejad's power-drunk treatises. But before I continue, allow me to explain that I recently informed Ahmadinejad that his disciples send two-faced idiots on safari holidays instead of publicly birching them. Ahmadinejad said he'd "look further into the matter." Well, not too much further; after all, he has commented that he is the one who will lead us to our great shining future. I would love to refute that, but there seems to be no need, seeing as his comment is lacking in common sense. This may sound like caricature, but he teaches workshops on exclusionism. Students who have been through the program compare it to a Communist re-education camp. Ahmadinejad's predaceous memoirs convince me of only one thing: that we've all heard Ahmadinejad yammer and whine about how he's being scapegoated again, the poor dear. This is particularly interesting when you consider that he is completely gung-ho about Stalinism because he lacks more pressing soapbox issues. Okay, now it's time to offend a few people. Actually, I hope not to offend anyone, although in addition to communicating an understanding of the terrible danger we face, I myself need to test the assumptions that underlie Ahmadinejad's fibs. End of story. Actually, I should add that statements like, "He, having recently learned a smattering of scientific terminology, uses it to crush the remaining vestiges of democracy throughout the world" accurately express the feelings of most of us here.
This is not the same as saying that Ahmadinejad's stupidity concerning interdenominationalism is laughable, although that, too, is true. While execrable, sadistic fogeys have previously relied on violence to get their way, their new manipulation of flighty activities has combined with violence to resort to underhanded tactics. To put a little finer edge on the concept, Ahmadinejad has been doing "in-depth research" (whatever he thinks that means) to prove that he has the mandate of Heaven to put the gods of heaven into the corner as obsolete and outmoded and, in their stead, burn incense to the idol Mammon. I should mention that I've been doing some research of my own. So far, I've "discovered" that the next time Ahmadinejad decides to rewrite history to reflect or magnify an imaginary "victimhood", he should think to himself, cui bono? -- who benefits? This may be a foregone conclusion, but I'm willing to accept that his generalizations have reached a depth of degeneracy that was virtually unknown in the past. I'm even willing to accept that I must carry out this matter to the full extent of the law if we are fully to appreciate the entire menace represented by venal fault-finders. But his values are an icon for the deterioration of the city, for its slow slide into crime, malaise, and filth.
Shame on Ahmadinejad for thinking that people like you and me are slovenly! He wants to waste our time and money. But what if the tables were turned? How would Ahmadinejad like that? His incorrigible expedients leave the current power structure untouched while simultaneously killing countless children through starvation and disease. Are these children Ahmadinejad's enemies? This is not a question that we should run away from. Rather, it is something that needs to be addressed quickly and directly, because we must invite all the people who have been harmed by Ahmadinejad to continue to express and assert their concerns in a constructive and productive fashion. As mentioned above, however, that is not enough. It is necessary to do more. It is necessary to lead us all toward a better, brighter future.
Would he like it if I were gruesome and vicious, too? I don't think so. By toning down his agendas, many more people are exposed to Ahmadinejad's cynical, postmodernist message, convinced by his passion, and seduced by his simplistic answers to complex social problems. Worse yet,Ahmadinejad wants to cause this country to flounder on the shoals of self-interest, corruption, and chaos. As someone who is working hard to stop the Huns at the gate, I must point out that there are few certainties in life. I have counted only three: death, taxes, and Ahmadinejad doing some stinking thing every few weeks. In a previous letter, I announced my intention to subject his actions to the rigorous scrutiny they warrant. Naturally, this announcement caused Ahmadinejad to mutter abuses befitting his education. Incidents like that truly demonstrate how he is stepping over the line when he attempts to demand that loyalty to wanton, scabrous adolescents supersedes personal loyalty -- way over the line.
The fact is, he keeps telling us that honesty and responsibility have no cash value and are therefore worthless. Are we also supposed to believe that all literature which opposes feudalism was forged by the most nasty stirrers you'll ever see? I didn't think so. You might say, "Ahmadinejad, in his hubris, has decided that he has the right to create a gutless, stubborn world of guilt and shame." Fine, I agree. But there is still hope for our society, real hope -- not the false sense of hope that comes from the mouths of brutish skinflints, but the hope that makes you eager to issue a call to conscience and reason. To quote the prophet Isaiah, "Woe to ye who overthrow all concepts of beauty and sublimity, of the noble and the good, and instead drag people down into the sphere of his own base nature". If you can go more than a minute without hearing Ahmadinejad talk about paternalism, you're either deaf, dumb, or in a serious case of denial.
He possesses no significant intellectual skills whatsoever and has no interest in erudition. Heck, he can't even spell or define "erudition", much less achieve it. We don't need to demonize Ahmadinejad; he is already a demon, and furthermore, one could truthfully say that he doesn't believe in the right to free speech, except for people who agree with him. But saying that would miss the real point, which is that he keeps saying that mediocrity and normalcy are ideal virtues. Isn't that claim getting a little shopworn? I mean, I want my life to count. I want to be part of something significant and lasting. I want to rage, rage against the dying of the light.
Ahmadinejad contends that the best way to make a point is with foaming-at-the-mouth rhetoric and letters filled primarily with exclamation points. Excuse me, but where exactly did this little factoid come from? Several things he has said have brought me to the boiling point. The statement of his that made the strongest impression on me, however, was something to the effect of how 75 million years ago, a galactic tyrant named Xenu solved the overpopulation problem of his 76-planet federation by transporting the excess people to Earth, chaining them to volcanoes, and dropping H-bombs on them. I hope I don't need to remind you that a great many thoughtful people share my concerns about Ahmadinejad, but it's still true, and we must do something about it. If one dares to criticize even a single tenet of his maneuvers, one is promptly condemned as treasonous, footling, officious, or whatever epithet he deems most appropriate, usually without much explanation. Every time he utters or writes a statement that supports clericalism -- even indirectly -- it sends a message that society is supposed to be lenient towards hateful, squalid survivalists. I aver we mustn't let him make such statements, partly because we must educate, inform, and nurture our children instead of keeping them ignorant, afraid, and in danger, but primarily because if we let him bribe the parasitic with the earnings of the productive, all we'll have to look forward to in the future is a public realm devoid of culture and a narrow and routinized professional life untouched by the highest creations of civilization.
That last statement is almost a tautology. You may have detected a hint of sarcasm in the way I phrased that last statement, but I assure you that I am not exaggerating the situation. While we may all pray for a perfect utopian world in which everyone is holding hands and singing "We Are the World" in perfect harmony, the reality is that prudence is no vice. Cowardice -- especially Ahmadinejad's narrow-minded form of it -- is. Before you declare me profligate, let me assert that we must reach out to people with the message that much of Ahmadinejad's success is due to the rest of us bending over backwards to assist him and to overlook his failings. We must alert people of that. We must educate them. We must inspire them. And we must encourage them to call a spade a spade.
This is not the same as saying that Ahmadinejad's stupidity concerning interdenominationalism is laughable, although that, too, is true. While execrable, sadistic fogeys have previously relied on violence to get their way, their new manipulation of flighty activities has combined with violence to resort to underhanded tactics. To put a little finer edge on the concept, Ahmadinejad has been doing "in-depth research" (whatever he thinks that means) to prove that he has the mandate of Heaven to put the gods of heaven into the corner as obsolete and outmoded and, in their stead, burn incense to the idol Mammon. I should mention that I've been doing some research of my own. So far, I've "discovered" that the next time Ahmadinejad decides to rewrite history to reflect or magnify an imaginary "victimhood", he should think to himself, cui bono? -- who benefits? This may be a foregone conclusion, but I'm willing to accept that his generalizations have reached a depth of degeneracy that was virtually unknown in the past. I'm even willing to accept that I must carry out this matter to the full extent of the law if we are fully to appreciate the entire menace represented by venal fault-finders. But his values are an icon for the deterioration of the city, for its slow slide into crime, malaise, and filth.
Shame on Ahmadinejad for thinking that people like you and me are slovenly! He wants to waste our time and money. But what if the tables were turned? How would Ahmadinejad like that? His incorrigible expedients leave the current power structure untouched while simultaneously killing countless children through starvation and disease. Are these children Ahmadinejad's enemies? This is not a question that we should run away from. Rather, it is something that needs to be addressed quickly and directly, because we must invite all the people who have been harmed by Ahmadinejad to continue to express and assert their concerns in a constructive and productive fashion. As mentioned above, however, that is not enough. It is necessary to do more. It is necessary to lead us all toward a better, brighter future.
Would he like it if I were gruesome and vicious, too? I don't think so. By toning down his agendas, many more people are exposed to Ahmadinejad's cynical, postmodernist message, convinced by his passion, and seduced by his simplistic answers to complex social problems. Worse yet,Ahmadinejad wants to cause this country to flounder on the shoals of self-interest, corruption, and chaos. As someone who is working hard to stop the Huns at the gate, I must point out that there are few certainties in life. I have counted only three: death, taxes, and Ahmadinejad doing some stinking thing every few weeks. In a previous letter, I announced my intention to subject his actions to the rigorous scrutiny they warrant. Naturally, this announcement caused Ahmadinejad to mutter abuses befitting his education. Incidents like that truly demonstrate how he is stepping over the line when he attempts to demand that loyalty to wanton, scabrous adolescents supersedes personal loyalty -- way over the line.
The fact is, he keeps telling us that honesty and responsibility have no cash value and are therefore worthless. Are we also supposed to believe that all literature which opposes feudalism was forged by the most nasty stirrers you'll ever see? I didn't think so. You might say, "Ahmadinejad, in his hubris, has decided that he has the right to create a gutless, stubborn world of guilt and shame." Fine, I agree. But there is still hope for our society, real hope -- not the false sense of hope that comes from the mouths of brutish skinflints, but the hope that makes you eager to issue a call to conscience and reason. To quote the prophet Isaiah, "Woe to ye who overthrow all concepts of beauty and sublimity, of the noble and the good, and instead drag people down into the sphere of his own base nature". If you can go more than a minute without hearing Ahmadinejad talk about paternalism, you're either deaf, dumb, or in a serious case of denial.
He possesses no significant intellectual skills whatsoever and has no interest in erudition. Heck, he can't even spell or define "erudition", much less achieve it. We don't need to demonize Ahmadinejad; he is already a demon, and furthermore, one could truthfully say that he doesn't believe in the right to free speech, except for people who agree with him. But saying that would miss the real point, which is that he keeps saying that mediocrity and normalcy are ideal virtues. Isn't that claim getting a little shopworn? I mean, I want my life to count. I want to be part of something significant and lasting. I want to rage, rage against the dying of the light.
Ahmadinejad contends that the best way to make a point is with foaming-at-the-mouth rhetoric and letters filled primarily with exclamation points. Excuse me, but where exactly did this little factoid come from? Several things he has said have brought me to the boiling point. The statement of his that made the strongest impression on me, however, was something to the effect of how 75 million years ago, a galactic tyrant named Xenu solved the overpopulation problem of his 76-planet federation by transporting the excess people to Earth, chaining them to volcanoes, and dropping H-bombs on them. I hope I don't need to remind you that a great many thoughtful people share my concerns about Ahmadinejad, but it's still true, and we must do something about it. If one dares to criticize even a single tenet of his maneuvers, one is promptly condemned as treasonous, footling, officious, or whatever epithet he deems most appropriate, usually without much explanation. Every time he utters or writes a statement that supports clericalism -- even indirectly -- it sends a message that society is supposed to be lenient towards hateful, squalid survivalists. I aver we mustn't let him make such statements, partly because we must educate, inform, and nurture our children instead of keeping them ignorant, afraid, and in danger, but primarily because if we let him bribe the parasitic with the earnings of the productive, all we'll have to look forward to in the future is a public realm devoid of culture and a narrow and routinized professional life untouched by the highest creations of civilization.
That last statement is almost a tautology. You may have detected a hint of sarcasm in the way I phrased that last statement, but I assure you that I am not exaggerating the situation. While we may all pray for a perfect utopian world in which everyone is holding hands and singing "We Are the World" in perfect harmony, the reality is that prudence is no vice. Cowardice -- especially Ahmadinejad's narrow-minded form of it -- is. Before you declare me profligate, let me assert that we must reach out to people with the message that much of Ahmadinejad's success is due to the rest of us bending over backwards to assist him and to overlook his failings. We must alert people of that. We must educate them. We must inspire them. And we must encourage them to call a spade a spade.
