slicknic wrote:
its not only common sense that if you pay for an expansion youll get better weapons... but just from using them.. they are rediculous.
So all of the tier-two unlocks are better than
all of the tier-one unlocks, which are better than
all of the standard guns?
Sweeping generalisations almost always tend to be wrong in some particulars; this one is no different
slicknic wrote:
anyone who doesnt think unlocks (expecially ones you have to pay extra money for) arent any better than the default guns are in serious denial.
Depends on the class. I mean seriously, the AKs are hard to beat for close-up power (and they're not too shabby at range either) even
I can do pretty well with one and I suck with assault rifles and iron sights.
Another example: obviously the M95 is a step up in certain ways from the SVD or the Type 88 because of the higher damage and improved scope magnification, but for many the M24 is the superior sniper's choice, particularly if you're good at headshots, and that's a default gun.
You want to talk about imbalance, there's some built right into the game: MEC v. USMC you've got snipers on one side with the SVD facing snipers armed with the M24 on the other;
no contest at range. Up close and personal you've got assault and medics using the AK-101 (full auto and one of the most powerful assault rifles) facing the M16 (burst fire only, much lower damage).