I need a good title for this story. It's about the death of my Aunt.
I had "Unforgettable Loss" in mind, but that's too generic....any ideas?
I had "Unforgettable Loss" in mind, but that's too generic....any ideas?
... could further decrease the value of human life?Winston_Churchill wrote:
I need the opposite of empathySuperslim wrote:
empathyWinston_Churchill wrote:
This thread can be used to post and homework help, questions etc that you have
I'll be first
"This revelation created an outpouring of sympathy, but an equally large response of ______."
I made this sentence about Assisted Suicide and I'm looking for a good word to end it with. A word that means something like anger, or oppression... something that sounds professional too
Thanks a lot in advance!
I have another one too...
"One very important note that the doctors make is that if assisted suicide is legalized it could lead to further devaluing of human life."
I need another word for further devaluing
Easy, they are both equalateral (sp?) triangles. By proving that each side has 60 degree. AG = GB, DG=GE, tringle AGB = tringle DGE by the ASA theory. Angels AGB and DGE are equal to each other because in an equalateral (sp) triange all angles are equal to 60 degrees.Nessie09 wrote:
Yeah, but I don't know how to prove that they are simmilarjoemah wrote:
They are similair trianlges, use that to prove it.Nessie09 wrote:
No idea, but since we are doing homework: (yes this was in the math topic aswell)
http://img1.putfile.com/thumb/9/26613451733.jpg(click to enlarge)
prove that ED is parallel to CF
been working on this all day, but can't figure it out
1.7724538509055160272981674833411Cougar wrote:
Find the square root of 3.14.
No, too bad that isn't right. The angles ar not all 60 degrees.dubbs wrote:
Easy, they are both equalateral (sp?) triangles. By proving that each side has 60 degree. AG = GB, DG=GE, tringle AGB = tringle DGE by the ASA theory. Angels AGB and DGE are equal to each other because in an equalateral (sp) triange all angles are equal to 60 degrees.Nessie09 wrote:
Yeah, but I don't know how to prove that they are simmilarjoemah wrote:
They are similair trianlges, use that to prove it.
Hope that is right, geometery is a little rusty, since I have not used it since 99.
or this (powercalc.exe ftw)Cheez wrote:
1.7724538509055160272981674833411Cougar wrote:
Find the square root of 3.14.
calc.exe ftw
sqrt(pi) 1.7724538509055160272981674833411451827975494561223871282138077898529112845910321813749506567385446654162268236242825706662361528657244226025250937096027870684620376986531051228499251730289508262289320953792679628001746390153514797205167001901852340185854469744949126403139217755259062164054193325009063984076137334774751534336679897893658518364087954511651617387600590673934317913328098548462481849020546548521956132515616474675150427387610561079961271072100603720444836723652966137080943234988316684242138457096
cripes! thats longNessie09 wrote:
or this (powercalc.exe ftw)Cheez wrote:
1.7724538509055160272981674833411Cougar wrote:
Find the square root of 3.14.
calc.exe ftwCode:
sqrt(pi) 1.7724538509055160272981674833411451827975494561223871282138077898529112845910321813749506567385446654162268236242825706662361528657244226025250937096027870684620376986531051228499251730289508262289320953792679628001746390153514797205167001901852340185854469744949126403139217755259062164054193325009063984076137334774751534336679897893658518364087954511651617387600590673934317913328098548462481849020546548521956132515616474675150427387610561079961271072100603720444836723652966137080943234988316684242138457096
how are they not 60 degrees??? By defination an equalateral triangle has 3 sides of the same length, and the angle of any angle is 60 degrees.Nessie09 wrote:
No, too bad that isn't right. The angles ar not all 60 degrees.dubbs wrote:
Easy, they are both equalateral (sp?) triangles. By proving that each side has 60 degree. AG = GB, DG=GE, tringle AGB = tringle DGE by the ASA theory. Angels AGB and DGE are equal to each other because in an equalateral (sp) triange all angles are equal to 60 degrees.Nessie09 wrote:
Yeah, but I don't know how to prove that they are simmilar
Hope that is right, geometery is a little rusty, since I have not used it since 99.
Yeah, but are they equalateral? I can't see it... Make a picture pointing it out or something if you can plz.dubbs wrote:
how are they not 60 degrees??? By defination an equalateral triangle has 3 sides of the same length, and the angle of any angle is 60 degrees.Nessie09 wrote:
No, too bad that isn't right. The angles ar not all 60 degrees.dubbs wrote:
Easy, they are both equalateral (sp?) triangles. By proving that each side has 60 degree. AG = GB, DG=GE, tringle AGB = tringle DGE by the ASA theory. Angels AGB and DGE are equal to each other because in an equalateral (sp) triange all angles are equal to 60 degrees.
Hope that is right, geometery is a little rusty, since I have not used it since 99.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangles
There are 180 degrees in any triangle.Nessie09 wrote:
Yeah, but are they equalateral? I can't see it... Make a picture pointing it out or something if you can plz.dubbs wrote:
how are they not 60 degrees??? By defination an equalateral triangle has 3 sides of the same length, and the angle of any angle is 60 degrees.Nessie09 wrote:
No, too bad that isn't right. The angles ar not all 60 degrees.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangles
you have to use a ratioNessie09 wrote:
Yeah, but I don't know how to prove that they are simmilarjoemah wrote:
They are similair trianlges, use that to prove it.Nessie09 wrote:
No idea, but since we are doing homework: (yes this was in the math topic aswell)
http://img1.putfile.com/thumb/9/26613451733.jpg(click to enlarge)
prove that ED is parallel to CF
been working on this all day, but can't figure it out
You cant measure speed in inchesCougar wrote:
How fast does light move, measured in inches?
Last edited by Mong0ose (2006-09-24 14:23:18)
Ok, will try that tomorrow... (first have to translate all the english terms though...)Mong0ose wrote:
Thats pretty easy
Calculate the ratio of GC:GF (ie the lengths) and compare that to the ratio of GD:GE - check they are equal
Then simply bisect both circles twice and calcualte the dot product of the intersection
1.18028527 × 10^10 inches per secondMong0ose wrote:
You cant measure speed in inchesCougar wrote:
How fast does light move, measured in inches?
By definition, speed is the rate of change of a bodies position in space
Last edited by Nessie09 (2006-09-24 14:27:41)