Marlboroman82
Personal philosophy: Clothing optional.
+1,022|6638|Camp XRay

It's not as easy to destroy the Earth as you might think; evil geniuses everywhere have been trying for years. The problem lies with the fact that the Earth is pretty big (at least compared to you and me) and it takes quite a bit of energy to destroy it. There is a way however, to do it with nothing more than a coffee can. https://www.deepastronomy.com/images/coffeeposter.gif

You can easily do this project over the course of a weekend, perhaps on Saturday afternoon. You'll have to figure out for yourself where to spend Sunday.

Before I go too much further, there is a difference between destroying the Earth and destroying life on Earth. It takes much less energy to destroy all life, all you need to do that is block out the Sun or release some kind of virus.

No, I'm talking about blowing the planet to bits. Vaporizing it. I realize completely that by telling you this, I'll lose my membership status in the Evil Genius Guild but in the fine tradition of Make Magazine, I wanted to share this with you.


The Problem

OK, so you've decided that you want to destroy the Earth this Saturday. Good. Let's begin by understanding why it hasn't been done already and what you'll need to do before someone else tries it, say, next Saturday.

To completely vaporize the Earth, you'll need to overcome the Gravitational Binding Energy of all of the atoms that hold the planet together. This amounts to 224,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 Joules.

If you are uninspired, as so many evil geniuses are (sorry guys, but you know you are), then you probably went to ThermoNuclear Depot and tried to buy some nuclear weapons to do the job. Stan, the nice guy who works in that department with the bright red vest wearing a button that says 'Get Bent', told you that it would take roughly 107,000,000,000,000 bombs to vaporize the planet (he gets about three guys a week asking for the same thing). He politely and cheerfully sends you to the Special Order department to fill out one of their forms (they don't keep that many in stock, and they are seasonal). Most evil geniuses are averse to filling out forms, so you left.

Here's the math:

224,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 Joules per planet divided by
2,100,000,000,000,000,000 Joules per nuclear bomb =
107,000,000,000,000 nuclear bombs per planet.


Of course, this assumes you use the good stuff, the Hydrogen bomb. You'd need a thousand times as many bombs if you went with the old-style uranium kind.

But YOU are not that guy. You're inspired. You're a critical thinker, an early-adopter. You like thinking outside the box (after all, you're a regular visitor to my site, right? That makes you remarkable all by itself.)


The Solution

This problem is easily overcome with something known as vacuum energy. No, not the amount of energy generated by a Hoover cleaning a carpet , but the latent energy that exists in absolutely nothing. (DISCLAIMER: Do not even try to mess with the so-called Hoover Vortex Energy. Handling that amount of energy requires special suits and trained professionals at government supercollider facilities. We just want to destroy the Earth here, not the universe.)

What is vacuum energy? It turns out that what we thought was full of nothing, the vacuum of space, is actually a seething volume of matter, anti-matter interactions. These interactions contain a lot of energy. So much so that the number of these matter, anti-matter collisions occurring in a space as small as a light bulb generates enough energy to boil all of the Earth's oceans like a giant teapot.

Boiling the oceans is, of course, a worthy enough goal for many evil geniuses, but we're big thinkers here.

It's the same energy that causes black holes to evaporate, for goodness sakes.

The reason we don't all blow up due to this energy is that the interactions happen very, very quickly, on a timescale shorter than the Planck Time, the shortest possible time interval science can measure. If something happens in a shorter time than this, we have no hope of measuring it.

Since they happen so quickly, the average energy of these interactions remains zero, and we don't blow up.

Of course, some people always have to harsh our buzz, don't they? Many have suggested that this stuff isn't there and have responded with the suspiciously pirate-sounding Trans-Planckian Problem. Don't let that get in your way. Those people are just upset they didn't think of this first.

The trick to getting vacuum energy to work for you is to slow down the interactions so that they occur on a longer timescale. We're not talking about a long time here, just longer than the Planck time, which is only 0.000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,054 seconds. For heavens sakes, how hard could that be?

So the question becomes, how do you delay the interaction between these subatomic particles long enough so we can extract the energy? I suggest distracting them. By distracting the matter/anti-matter particles for a little longer than the Planck time, the energy becomes part of the real universe, the universe that we can measure. Once that happens, we can harness it.

So what's the best method of distraction? Well, there's a lot to choose from here. We could make them participate in one of ProBlogger's Group Writing Projects, or http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcBV-cXV … ube videos, but I've found something better: Photos of Angelina Jolie.

After extensive, exhaustive research on the subject, I've concluded that subatomic matter/anti-matter particles really like looking at pictures of Angelina Jolie. And really, who can blame them?
https://www.deepastronomy.com/images/AngelinaJolie.jpg

This is a perfect example of a simple solution to a complex problem. Einstein would be proud (and a little embarrassed) and I could care less what Stephen Hawking thinks (this'll teach him for putting out that restraining order on me).


Procedure

This is the part you've been waiting for: how to do it. Well, the first step is to get a coffee can. Since the volume of a light bulb is enough to boil the oceans, I figure you'll need something larger, like a coffee can, if you want to vaporize the planet.

Take the coffee can and cut a small hole in one side (it doesn't really matter if you leave the little plastic lid on or not). This allows the subatomic particles inside to see the picture of Angelina (you can use the one posted above, but believe me, there are WAY better ones). Then, put the picture next to the coffee can and RUN LIKE HELL.




Big props to http://www.deepastronomy.com/how-to-des … e-can.html

Last edited by Marlboroman82 (2006-09-20 08:01:25)

https://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l250/marlboroman82/Untitled-8.png
Master*
Banned
+416|6510|United States
not funny nor amusing
SkoobyDu
'CLICK JOIN NOW'... OK lets go... BOOM!!!! =FFS=
+120|6577|Cheshire, UK
https://www.thepulsemag.com/Entertainment/Images/familyguy1.gif

Now your just giving Stewie Griffin Ideas...

Last edited by SkoobyDu (2006-09-20 08:10:28)

mavrick 3399
EA GAMES PATCH EVERYTHING
+102|6557|Doncaster UK
i liked it it was a good read!
Kung Jew
That one mod
+331|6760|Houston, TX
Gosh and to think this whole time my mentors for this had been two mice stuck in a cage....
But they just wanted to TRY AND TAKE OVER THE WORLD!

not blow it up.

KJ

PS - I'd venture to say that the photo used to distract can be a variable.  Would the time be extended more with a different picture?  Which would be more distracting? Nekkid hotties Vs Nekkid Uglies?  (the Wow! vs Whoa! factor)
SkoobyDu
'CLICK JOIN NOW'... OK lets go... BOOM!!!! =FFS=
+120|6577|Cheshire, UK

mavrick 3399 wrote:

i liked it it was a good read!
Any plans for global domination?
Marlboroman82
Personal philosophy: Clothing optional.
+1,022|6638|Camp XRay

Kung Jew wrote:

Gosh and to think this whole time my mentors for this had been two mice stuck in a cage....
But they just wanted to TRY AND TAKE OVER THE WORLD!

not blow it up.

KJ
i thought they blew it up and rebuilt it...
https://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l250/marlboroman82/Untitled-8.png
Kaosdad
Whisky Tango Foxtrot?
+201|6694|Broadlands, VA
But, you're assuming all of the particles are either straight males, or lesbians.

And it would work better if she were naked.
Deadman
Member
+34|6458|England
Your theory is flawed. I suspect that subatomic matter/anti-matter particles have somewhere already seen pictures of Anjelina somewhere. So the fact we are still here, proves they weren't distracted enough to enter our world/timescale.
Breez
AKA: badhq
+937|6647|Derby, England

Marlboroman82 wrote:

It's not as easy to destroy the Earth as you might think; evil geniuses everywhere have been trying for years. The problem lies with the fact that the Earth is pretty big (at least compared to you and me) and it takes quite a bit of energy to destroy it. There is a way however, to do it with nothing more than a coffee can. http://www.deepastronomy.com/images/coffeeposter.gif

You can easily do this project over the course of a weekend, perhaps on Saturday afternoon. You'll have to figure out for yourself where to spend Sunday.

Before I go too much further, there is a difference between destroying the Earth and destroying life on Earth. It takes much less energy to destroy all life, all you need to do that is block out the Sun or release some kind of virus.

No, I'm talking about blowing the planet to bits. Vaporizing it. I realize completely that by telling you this, I'll lose my membership status in the Evil Genius Guild but in the fine tradition of Make Magazine, I wanted to share this with you.


The Problem

OK, so you've decided that you want to destroy the Earth this Saturday. Good. Let's begin by understanding why it hasn't been done already and what you'll need to do before someone else tries it, say, next Saturday.

To completely vaporize the Earth, you'll need to overcome the Gravitational Binding Energy of all of the atoms that hold the planet together. This amounts to 224,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 Joules.

If you are uninspired, as so many evil geniuses are (sorry guys, but you know you are), then you probably went to ThermoNuclear Depot and tried to buy some nuclear weapons to do the job. Stan, the nice guy who works in that department with the bright red vest wearing a button that says 'Get Bent', told you that it would take roughly 107,000,000,000,000 bombs to vaporize the planet (he gets about three guys a week asking for the same thing). He politely and cheerfully sends you to the Special Order department to fill out one of their forms (they don't keep that many in stock, and they are seasonal). Most evil geniuses are averse to filling out forms, so you left.

Here's the math:

224,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 Joules per planet divided by
2,100,000,000,000,000,000 Joules per nuclear bomb =
107,000,000,000,000 nuclear bombs per planet.


Of course, this assumes you use the good stuff, the Hydrogen bomb. You'd need a thousand times as many bombs if you went with the old-style uranium kind.

But YOU are not that guy. You're inspired. You're a critical thinker, an early-adopter. You like thinking outside the box (after all, you're a regular visitor to my site, right? That makes you remarkable all by itself.)


The Solution

This problem is easily overcome with something known as vacuum energy. No, not the amount of energy generated by a Hoover cleaning a carpet , but the latent energy that exists in absolutely nothing. (DISCLAIMER: Do not even try to mess with the so-called Hoover Vortex Energy. Handling that amount of energy requires special suits and trained professionals at government supercollider facilities. We just want to destroy the Earth here, not the universe.)

What is vacuum energy? It turns out that what we thought was full of nothing, the vacuum of space, is actually a seething volume of matter, anti-matter interactions. These interactions contain a lot of energy. So much so that the number of these matter, anti-matter collisions occurring in a space as small as a light bulb generates enough energy to boil all of the Earth's oceans like a giant teapot.

Boiling the oceans is, of course, a worthy enough goal for many evil geniuses, but we're big thinkers here.

It's the same energy that causes black holes to evaporate, for goodness sakes.

The reason we don't all blow up due to this energy is that the interactions happen very, very quickly, on a timescale shorter than the Planck Time, the shortest possible time interval science can measure. If something happens in a shorter time than this, we have no hope of measuring it.

Since they happen so quickly, the average energy of these interactions remains zero, and we don't blow up.

Of course, some people always have to harsh our buzz, don't they? Many have suggested that this stuff isn't there and have responded with the suspiciously pirate-sounding Trans-Planckian Problem. Don't let that get in your way. Those people are just upset they didn't think of this first.

The trick to getting vacuum energy to work for you is to slow down the interactions so that they occur on a longer timescale. We're not talking about a long time here, just longer than the Planck time, which is only 0.000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,054 seconds. For heavens sakes, how hard could that be?

So the question becomes, how do you delay the interaction between these subatomic particles long enough so we can extract the energy? I suggest distracting them. By distracting the matter/anti-matter particles for a little longer than the Planck time, the energy becomes part of the real universe, the universe that we can measure. Once that happens, we can harness it.

So what's the best method of distraction? Well, there's a lot to choose from here. We could make them participate in one of ProBlogger's Group Writing Projects, or http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcBV-cXV … ube videos, but I've found something better: Photos of Angelina Jolie.

After extensive, exhaustive research on the subject, I've concluded that subatomic matter/anti-matter particles really like looking at pictures of Angelina Jolie. And really, who can blame them?
http://www.deepastronomy.com/images/AngelinaJolie.jpg

This is a perfect example of a simple solution to a complex problem. Einstein would be proud (and a little embarrassed) and I could care less what Stephen Hawking thinks (this'll teach him for putting out that restraining order on me).


Procedure

This is the part you've been waiting for: how to do it. Well, the first step is to get a coffee can. Since the volume of a light bulb is enough to boil the oceans, I figure you'll need something larger, like a coffee can, if you want to vaporize the planet.

Take the coffee can and cut a small hole in one side (it doesn't really matter if you leave the little plastic lid on or not). This allows the subatomic particles inside to see the picture of Angelina (you can use the one posted above, but believe me, there are WAY better ones). Then, put the picture next to the coffee can and RUN LIKE HELL.




Big props to http://www.deepastronomy.com/how-to-des … e-can.html
This guy should run as president of USA
InviSniper
The first true Sniper.
+95|6659|Cumberland, MD, USA
I'm gonna do it... for real. Goodbye cruel world. Pics if we all don't die by Saturday.
Vartan
Member
+10|6758|Belgium
I yawned twice reading this, I want my time back
WarmPudgy
Member
+41|6603|Arkansas
meh, ill just stick to building my giant fish magnet
InviSniper
The first true Sniper.
+95|6659|Cumberland, MD, USA

WarmPudgy wrote:

meh, ill just stick to building my giant fish magnet
I already have one; it's called a rod.
Kaosdad
Whisky Tango Foxtrot?
+201|6694|Broadlands, VA
I'm still trying to find the best way to keep buttered bread on the back of a cat.
Cbass
Kick His Ass!
+371|6710|Howell, Mi USA
Nice job, it managed to keep my attention for a few minutes.

Sounds too complicated, ill stick to my giant frickin "lazer"
https://bf3s.com/sigs/bb53a522780eff5b30ba3252d44932cc2f5b8c4f.png
iPoon.be
Internet Poon
+145|6545|Belgium
Excellent <rubs fingers together>
Marlboroman82
Personal philosophy: Clothing optional.
+1,022|6638|Camp XRay

Cbass wrote:

Nice job, it managed to keep my attention for a few minutes.

Sounds too complicated, ill stick to my giant frickin "lazer"
well if you ever near my secret lair stop by and we can discuss world domination
https://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l250/marlboroman82/Untitled-8.png
Skruples
Mod Incarnate
+234|6716
Cbass
Kick His Ass!
+371|6710|Howell, Mi USA

Marlboroman82 wrote:

Cbass wrote:

Nice job, it managed to keep my attention for a few minutes.

Sounds too complicated, ill stick to my giant frickin "lazer"
well if you ever near my secret lair stop by and we can discuss world domination
Ok, is it the first left off the highway? your lair is the one with the flashy sign out front that says "secret Lair" ?
https://bf3s.com/sigs/bb53a522780eff5b30ba3252d44932cc2f5b8c4f.png
Marlboroman82
Personal philosophy: Clothing optional.
+1,022|6638|Camp XRay

thats great i love this one, all though we could prob debate it till the cows come home(wow i don't think i have ever actually used that phrase before...)
Destroyed by God

You will need: God


Method: Far be it from me to dictate whether God does or does not exist, but if he did, and was omnipotent, then no doubt he could destroy the Earth at a mere thought if he should decide to. Of course, the question arises of how we persuade him to do this.

The first idea which springs to mind is to simply bring about the Apocalypse described in the Christian Bible. Assuming the book of Revelations is an accurate, literal depiction of future events, verse 1 of chapter 21 reads "Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and there was no longer any sea".

It seems astounding that the complete destruction of an entire planet (and heaven too) would only be worth a single sentence in this lengthy account of the End Times. But on the other hand, verse 5 of the 104th Psalm reads "He [God] set the Earth on its foundations; it can never be moved", and there are other verses like this, so maybe:
   
1. the New International Version of the Bible has "earth" written with a lower-case "e", which suggests that this verse could merely refer to, you know, the ground
   2. this verse could be merely metaphorical - after all, so is the creation story described in Genesis
   3. it could be that the new Earth is the same as the old Earth, and "new" just means it was "wiped clean" in some sense, like an Etch-A-Sketch


In all three cases, the new Earth would still need destroying for real.

Another suggestion, should Judaic mythology turn out to be correct, is finding and killing one or more of the Lamed Vav Tzadikim, 36 righteous men whose role in life is to justify the purpose of mankind in the eyes of God. If even one of these is missing, it is said the world would come to an end. Practically speaking, it would probably be easier to wipe out humanity than to find one these individuals, who do not themselves know who they are.

Comments: It is of course entirely possible that the means God would choose to use to destroy the Earth would be a natural, non-miraculous event such as one of those listed above.

Earth's final resting place: potentially any form, anywhere.

Feasibility rating  this, naturally, is entirely subjective.

Last edited by Marlboroman82 (2006-09-20 11:09:56)

https://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l250/marlboroman82/Untitled-8.png
kr@cker
Bringin' Sexy Back!
+581|6565|Southeastern USA
Jolie is a nasty truck stop skank, I can blame them
Marlboroman82
Personal philosophy: Clothing optional.
+1,022|6638|Camp XRay

kr@cker wrote:

Jolie is a nasty truck stop skank, I can blame them
? you must be gay...
https://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l250/marlboroman82/Untitled-8.png
seymorebutts443
Ready for combat
+211|6610|Belchertown Massachusetts, USA

Marlboroman82 wrote:

Kung Jew wrote:

Gosh and to think this whole time my mentors for this had been two mice stuck in a cage....
But they just wanted to TRY AND TAKE OVER THE WORLD!

not blow it up.

KJ
i thought they blew it up and rebuilt it...
they didnt blow it up or rebuild it.  the vogons blew it up for a hyperspacial highway system which was not needed when the Heart of Gold was built. they destroyed it anyways. andthey wanted it rebuilt but they discovered arther who was on earth before it was destroyed and the computer program was complete.
Marlboroman82
Personal philosophy: Clothing optional.
+1,022|6638|Camp XRay

seymorebutts443 wrote:

Marlboroman82 wrote:

Kung Jew wrote:

Gosh and to think this whole time my mentors for this had been two mice stuck in a cage....
But they just wanted to TRY AND TAKE OVER THE WORLD!

not blow it up.

KJ
i thought they blew it up and rebuilt it...
they didnt blow it up or rebuild it.  the vogons blew it up for a hyperspacial highway system which was not needed when the Heart of Gold was built. they destroyed it anyways. andthey wanted it rebuilt but they discovered arther who was on earth before it was destroyed and the computer program was complete.
it's been a while since i read the book
https://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l250/marlboroman82/Untitled-8.png

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard