MastersMom
YOUR mom goes to college
+61|6958
I've searched and not found what I'm looking for.

I bought a used 17" LCD monitor from a friend of mine and it works fine, but I'm trying to figure out what the best resolution is for it.

I've been running 800X600 @ 60htz but was messing with some of my BF2 settings the other day going for better fps and this is something I just don't know.  What are the differences between the different size resolutions, and how do I know what hertz I should be running at?  My options in BF2 go all the way up to 200 hertz.  On my computer properties under monitor info it just says "Default Monitor" and gives no details, and the choices for refresh rate go from 60 hertz up to 180 hertz.

So what difference does one make over the other, and how do I know what's best for me?

Oh yeah, if it makes a difference:

P4/ 2.8
1.5 G RAM
ATI 9800PRO 128mb

Gameplay settings usually at medium across the board, aa off, 100% view distance
Currently (just testing difference in fps) low on all but texture and lighting, aa off, 100% view distance.
PuckMercury
6 x 9 = 42
+298|6830|Portland, OR USA
without knowing the manufacturer and model, it's impossible to say, but it's probably 1024x768 at 60Hz
kylef
Gone
+1,352|6796|N. Ireland
You want the highest refresh rate possible (hertz) that you monitor can handle. most can handle around 70-80..

A better resolution makes things clearer and a better scale distance.. they also require higher graphics.
Wicked_Wumpus
Member
+7|6793|Ann Arbor, MI
The resolution is measured in pixels so a 1800 pixels x 1600 pixels (2.8 million pixels) resolution would look much better displaying the same picture than trying to do the same thing with 800 pixels x 600 pixels (480,000 pixels).  The more pixels the sharper your picture will look.
Agent_Dung_Bomb
Member
+302|7039|Salt Lake City

A 17" LCD will usually have a standard "native" resolution of 1280x1024.  The default will be 60Hz, but most decent LCDs will go as high as 75Hz.
Highpwr_BF2
Member
+1|6931
I'm not 100% sure on this, but on an LCD the response time now is typically 8ms or better.  8ms response should be equal to 125 hz.  Since hertz is cycles per second, if it takes 8 ms for a pixel to respond to me that would mean the monitor is capable of 125 cycles per second.  Older LCD response times are around the 12-16 ms which would be 60 - 80 hz.
Agent_Dung_Bomb
Member
+302|7039|Salt Lake City

Highpwr_BF2 wrote:

I'm not 100% sure on this, but on an LCD the response time now is typically 8ms or better.  8ms response should be equal to 125 hz.  Since hertz is cycles per second, if it takes 8 ms for a pixel to respond to me that would mean the monitor is capable of 125 cycles per second.  Older LCD response times are around the 12-16 ms which would be 60 - 80 hz.
Response time and refresh rate are not the same thing.  Also remember that response times are not a constant value, but rather an average.  You must also be careful about reading response times because they don't always tell you if that is the gray-to-gray time, or black-white-black time.
[TUF]Whiskey_Oktober
mmmm...Toasty!
+91|7025|Oregon
i run my 19" LCD's at 1280x1024 and 1440x900 (dual monitors) with a x1900xt, both have a max refresh rate or 75, but i perfer the look or 60hz personally, it just seems more natural. the FPS of your game will only matter if its on or above your refresh rate, which is why many video drivers can cap the max fps at the refresh rate....so as long as your getting =/ < fps, your set.
MastersMom
YOUR mom goes to college
+61|6958
Thanks to everyone that's posted so far...I think I understand now.
sixshot
Decepticon Geek
+50|6978|Planet Seibertron ;)
Some notes you should be aware when handling LCD/TFT/panels... they operate much differently in regards to refresh rates when compared to regular CRT monitors.  The resolution you use should look best when it is at its native resolution.  Many 17" panels have a native resolution of either 1024x768 or 1280x1024, depending on age, make, and model.  Use either one to have the best view.  However, video card is also a factor to getting playable framerate.  My R9800 Pro can handle 1024x768 fine but anything higher than that has been untested for me.

In regards to refresh rate, you are not obligated nor required to run a refresh rate higher than 60Hz.  This is because of the difference between panels and CRTs.  CRTs operate by sweeping each horizontal line with an electron gun.  Thus if the monitor does not display a picture fast enough, you begin to notice flickering and/or begin to feel discomfort from staring at the screen for long period of time.  With TFT/LCD panels, this no longer applies, as there's nothing that sweeps each horizontal line across the screen to display a picture.  All the pixels can be lit up simultaneously and thus the refresh rate setting no longer applies.

The optimal setting will be anything that is at the panel's native resolution.  You should start from there first and then tweak your way downwards until you find the setting that best suits your taste and preference.
Twist
Too old to be doing this sh*t
+103|6826|Little blue planet, milky way
Majority of LCDs will only be able to handle 60Hz in general. Some can DISPLAY 75Hz, but that's just an approximation. Usually, you get a better picture at 60Hz... I think someone wrote that bit already.

As for your resolution.. Again, look at your monitor, and see what the native resolution is. If it's 1440x900, then you run BF at this res for best results (higher means pixels are "truncated", lower means they get "blured". (Not sure of the exact technical term as my education was in CRTs originally, and haven't tried building a LCD myself) Neither of these results are ofcourse desirable. So go for native res. If you had a CRT, you could go for higher res at the cost of refreshrate. That's not the case with LCD... So if you want higher res, I recommend a better/larger LCD.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard