BF2S Forums Iraq vets running for US House & Congress: mostly as Democrats

CameronPoe wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

JimmyBotswana wrote:

The Republicans are going to steal the election, again.

Electronic voting machines ftw!

[sarcasm]Yea they stole the last one, was pretty close [/sarcasm]
By county red = Republican
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/ele … elarge.png

By state red = Republican
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/ele … elarge.png

THat looks to me like Redneck Hicks (Mid West/Deep South) v Enlightened City Folk (California/Chicago/New York/Philly/Boston/DC). You also seem to skim over the fact that the red zone is very lightly populated in comparison with the blue zone. LOL. Republicans still won but don't think it was a landslide because of those deceptive maps.

Mideastern part of the US is full of people. The rest is bread basket states, which no one gives a shit about.

But then again, opinions are only important if they come from big cities.

CameronPoe wrote:

USAFDude_1988 wrote:

No.. that's looks more like middle-class suburbia vs. unenlightened city folk. For example.. Chicago's suburbs are RED. D.C.'s suburbs are RED. San Diego is RED. Jacksonville, FL is RED.

I didn't realise people commuted to Chicago from Montana. My apologies.

Hmm.. choose to be ignorant. So much for seriousness.

Spearhead wrote:

Cause their anti-American traitors who hate their country

I'm confused. Who are you calling an anti-American traitor who hates their own country?

Kmarion wrote:

JimmyBotswana wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

[sarcasm]Yea they stole the last one, was pretty close [/sarcasm]
By county red = Republican

Actually do some research. Yes I know the results I am saying the election was stolen with the electronic voting machines. Here read this:

http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/ … ion_stolen

and get back to me

And why would the Democratic Party not pursue that if it had some degree of credibilty? Take a look at the author.
Get back to me.

Hmmmm boy that's a tough one, let me think for a second. Hmmmmmmmmmmm, oh I know, maybe it's because the Republicans control both the Senate and the House, so the Democrats can't start any investigations. Real nice display of your political prowess there. Oh, and why exactly is the author not credible? He's Robert Kennedy Jr. He's been an investigative journalist all his life. His article has references to sources every three sentences. How exactly is this not credible? Because he's a Kennedy? Nice rebuttal real thought provoking.

jonsimon wrote:

JimmyBotswana wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

And why would the Democratic Party not pursue that if it had some degree of credibilty? Take a look at the author.
Get back to me.

Hmmmm boy that's a tough one, let me think for a second. Hmmmmmmmmmmm, oh I know, maybe it's because the Republicans control both the Senate and the House, so the Democrats can't start any investigations. Real nice display of your political prowess there. Oh, and why exactly is the author not credible? He's Robert Kennedy Jr. He's been an investigative journalist all his life. His article has references to sources every three sentences. How exactly is this not credible? Because he's a Kennedy? Nice rebuttal real thought provoking.

Yeah, thats a pretty nice article. Rolling Stone and everything. Why someone would claim it isn't reliable is beyond me.

I disagree and will fight you to the death.

The_Shipbuilder wrote:

Deaths_Sandman wrote:

The_Shipbuilder wrote:

Why on earth could that be?

Probably because they were Democrats all along and now they have decided to run for office. But thats just my guess.

Actually, that sounds about right. America has a history of Democrat vets.

Who served in Viet Nam? John Kerry, Al Gore and Jack Murtha.


Who didn't serve in Viet Nam? George W. Bush and Dick Cheney.

Neither did Karl Rove.

Nor John Bolton and Tom Delay. 

Oh yes and neither did Dennis Hastert. Nor Bill Frist. Nor Newt Gingrich.

Or Bill Clinton!

beerface702 wrote:

Mccain ftw