BF2S Forums What do you think of Cheney/Bush/Rumsfeld?

lowing wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

No, you're right, there's no responsibility in the Katrina events in New Orleans, or perhaps there is...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co … 02261.html

Good point.

Bottom line.........How many of those people that died would have died if they left like they were ordered to??

personal responsibility.

I know I know you liberals NEED THE GOVT. to take care of you.........Most of us don't.

lowing wrote:

Neh yer right Clinton wasn't scandalous at all. He was an ANGELLLLLLLLLLL.

lowing wrote:

The_Shipbuilder wrote:

lowing wrote:

Bottom line.........How many of those people that died would have died if they left like they were ordered to??

personal responsibility.

I know I know you liberals NEED THE GOVT. to take care of you.........Most of us don't.

Hey it's lowing, our own Ignatius J. Reilly! Prepare to enjoy the Lowing Zone, where it's all opinions, all sarcastic pretense, all the time. Always free of original opinions and sources.

Well, that is one way to dodge answering a question you can't answer, personal attacks. OHHHH wellllllllllll

Ya know, I didn't add one bit of sarcasm in that post. I meant it, literally.

So why don't ya answer the question there ship builder?? JUST how many of them woulda died if they exercised some personal responsibility, and LEFT WHEN ORDERED TO??? After all, they had a week notice didn't they??, Or did that storm form over New Orleans with instant 160 MPH winds while they were all in bed?

Last edited by sergeriver (2006-08-16 10:21:40)

The_Shipbuilder wrote:

lowing wrote:

The_Shipbuilder wrote:

Hey it's lowing, our own Ignatius J. Reilly! Prepare to enjoy the Lowing Zone, where it's all opinions, all sarcastic pretense, all the time. Always free of original opinions and sources.

Well, that is one way to dodge answering a question you can't answer, personal attacks. OHHHH wellllllllllll

Ya know, I didn't add one bit of sarcasm in that post. I meant it, literally.

So why don't ya answer the question there ship builder?? JUST how many of them woulda died if they exercised some personal responsibility, and LEFT WHEN ORDERED TO??? After all, they had a week notice didn't they??, Or did that storm form over New Orleans with instant 160 MPH winds while they were all in bed?

Lowing, I've learned that you don't respond to logic nor opinions that are in disagreement with your current worldview. When you are out-debated, out-argued, and out-witted, you are convinced that you have won. You recognize neither literary references nor basic, overt irony. Your talent for parlance is uninspiring.

What's more, you've made 1,700 posts to BF2S since you joined in February (author search = lowing, show results as = posts; 25 posts per page x 69 total pages), roughly 10 posts per day. Sir, you are a stranger to silence, and you would do us all a service in befriending him. Though I don't anticipate such a happy outcome.

Your strategy is clearly one of verbal attrition. I haven't the time nor interest required to pursue a never-ending argument with someone so dedicated to advancing their own deluded opinions.

Edit: search URLs are not persistent.

Last edited by lowing (2006-08-16 15:48:23)

Bubbalo wrote:

lowing wrote:

In the event of an invasion of Japan it was estimated over 1,000,000 allied deathes would be incurred. do you really eed to ask why??

Uh-huh - so the US is dumb enough to hand power to the USSR to save some of their soldiers?  I think not.

lowing wrote:

NO it isn't, See my post to that genious shipbuilder a few posts up.

I can't be bothered trawling through that to find a reason.  If you have one, type it.

lowing wrote:

THAT is not how it played out bubbalo and I suspect you knw it. But the truth does not paint a pretty picture for the state and local govts. of Louisiana. SO blaming Bush for the weather now is much more fun it seems.

I don't blame Bush, at least, not primarily.  The bulk of my blame lies lower down the chain.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2006-08-16 15:30:40)

lowing wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

lowing wrote:

Neh yer right Clinton wasn't scandalous at all. He was an ANGELLLLLLLLLLL.

He did a lot better that your dumbass fellow, although that is not so difficult to do.

Well, we will just have to agree to disagree on that point. but since you didn't take the quiz, and conviently left my WHOLE post off of your response...........Clinton was 1 of the presidents EVER TO BE IMPEACHED, for lying to a grand jury.

sergeriver wrote:

lowing wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

He did a lot better that your dumbass fellow, although that is not so difficult to do.

Well, we will just have to agree to disagree on that point. but since you didn't take the quiz, and conviently left my WHOLE post off of your response...........Clinton was 1 of the presidents EVER TO BE IMPEACHED, for lying to a grand jury.

The guy had the balls to admit that he had lied, a thing that your piece of shit will never do.  Period.

lowing wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

lowing wrote:

I guess he is evil to the terrorist and the terrorist lap dogs. Although I do not follow him blindly ( as has been suggested from time to time) I agree 100% for his taking the fight to the Islamic radicals in this war on terror.

What news show do you see, go turn the tv off, you are buying shit.  Use your newspaper to throw your dog drops into the garbage.

Ya know, I tried, but I can not find anywhere where 911 and Spain and London and the foiled attempts, and all the beheadings were carried out by the boy scouts. Maybe you could help me with it. Please show me the sites that say all of those attacks were carried out by some other group.

sergeriver wrote:

lowing wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

What news show do you see, go turn the tv off, you are buying shit.  Use your newspaper to throw your dog drops into the garbage.

Ya know, I tried, but I can not find anywhere where 911 and Spain and London and the foiled attempts, and all the beheadings were carried out by the boy scouts. Maybe you could help me with it. Please show me the sites that say all of those attacks were carried out by some other group.

I'm tired of showing proof after proof to you, and you didn't show any damn thing that helps to build your "best president ever" theory, when the guy is a major dumbass.  Show us that he isn't an asshole, with facts and actions took by him and I will give u 1000 karma points for every damn post you have.  Meanwhile you are just talking and saying nothing (I like Living Color version of this song).

lowing wrote:

The_Shipbuilder wrote:

lowing wrote:

Well, that is one way to dodge answering a question you can't answer, personal attacks. OHHHH wellllllllllll

Ya know, I didn't add one bit of sarcasm in that post. I meant it, literally.

So why don't ya answer the question there ship builder?? JUST how many of them woulda died if they exercised some personal responsibility, and LEFT WHEN ORDERED TO??? After all, they had a week notice didn't they??, Or did that storm form over New Orleans with instant 160 MPH winds while they were all in bed?

Lowing, I've learned that you don't respond to logic nor opinions that are in disagreement with your current worldview. When you are out-debated, out-argued, and out-witted, you are convinced that you have won. You recognize neither literary references nor basic, overt irony. Your talent for parlance is uninspiring.

What's more, you've made 1,700 posts to BF2S since you joined in February (author search = lowing, show results as = posts; 25 posts per page x 69 total pages), roughly 10 posts per day. Sir, you are a stranger to silence, and you would do us all a service in befriending him. Though I don't anticipate such a happy outcome.

Your strategy is clearly one of verbal attrition. I haven't the time nor interest required to pursue a never-ending argument with someone so dedicated to advancing their own deluded opinions.

Edit: search URLs are not persistent.

Soooooooooo, I guess you WILL NOT answer the question then, hero??


It was really a pretty simple question, if you can take yourself beyond your self righteousness to answer it.

The_Shipbuilder wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

lowing wrote:

Please show me the sites that say all of those attacks were carried out by some other group.

I'm tired of showing proof after proof to you, and you didn't show any damn thing that helps to build your "best president ever" theory, when the guy is a major dumbass.  Show us that he isn't an asshole, with facts and actions took by him and I will give u 1000 karma points for every damn post you have.  Meanwhile you are just talking and saying nothing.

Serge: Lowing's schtick is this:

- he demands proof and sources for every statement that disagrees with his own viewpoint.
- he posts his own opinions - always completely free of sources or facts.
- if he is asked to provide sources and facts to back up his statements, he sarcastically says "GOD it's just SO obvious to EVERYONE, why should I provide sources, are you that stupid?!?!?!?" or something similar. He then asks YOU another question, to distract people from the fact that he doesn't back up his opinions, and puts YOU on the defensive.
- if he feels he has lost an argument, he will distract everyone from that fact by inventing some other way to prove that you are an idiot, and he will defensively bring this up again and again until you get bored of arguing with him.

Lowing is the ultimate troll. His communication strategy is very similar to that employed by North Korean negotiators.

He is insecure and needs constant validation, either from himself or from others. Serge, I would advise to give up attempting to discuss anything with him. Instead, just try to make him think he's doing a "good job". We should clap for him, and encourage him, just as we clap and cheer for Special Olympics athletes.