| Yes | 47% | 47% - 63 | ||||
| No | 52% | 52% - 71 | ||||
| Total: 134 | ||||||
You DO realize that your signature explains Israel to a "T", right?AlbertWesker[RE] wrote:
No because Lebanon has already confirmed they will be granted as much money as they need from Iran to rebuild everything.
But more on topic, why in the hell should Israel pay for rebuilding civilian structures of a civilian population that has ACCEPTED and let Hezbollah infest and fester. Well than Hezbollah or Lebanon needs to pay for the rebuilding of certain spots in Northern Israel even though the rockets didn't do too much damage.
You do realize that you are wrong, they did not use force or intimidation for a political or idelogical change, the whole point of them invading was self defense........do you read the news?HM1{N} wrote:
You DO realize that your signature explains Israel to a "T", right?AlbertWesker[RE] wrote:
No because Lebanon has already confirmed they will be granted as much money as they need from Iran to rebuild everything.
But more on topic, why in the hell should Israel pay for rebuilding civilian structures of a civilian population that has ACCEPTED and let Hezbollah infest and fester. Well than Hezbollah or Lebanon needs to pay for the rebuilding of certain spots in Northern Israel even though the rockets didn't do too much damage.
You do realize I'm talking about the illegal occupation of Palestine?AlbertWesker[RE] wrote:
You do realize that you are wrong, they did not use force or intimidation for a political or idelogical change, the whole point of them invading was self defense........do you read the news?HM1{N} wrote:
You DO realize that your signature explains Israel to a "T", right?AlbertWesker[RE] wrote:
No because Lebanon has already confirmed they will be granted as much money as they need from Iran to rebuild everything.
But more on topic, why in the hell should Israel pay for rebuilding civilian structures of a civilian population that has ACCEPTED and let Hezbollah infest and fester. Well than Hezbollah or Lebanon needs to pay for the rebuilding of certain spots in Northern Israel even though the rockets didn't do too much damage.
You do realize that the topic of your post is Israel and LEBANON. Where have you brought up Palestine and Israel being in parts of Gaza, Jerusalem, etc??? In fact Israel has been out of Gaza for awihle. I'm sorry I'm not following your arguement very well here.HM1{N} wrote:
You do realize I'm talking about the illegal occupation of Palestine?
I think that is a little to broad of a generalization my man, I agree with your first point, but not all Lebanese are pro Hezbollah/terrorists. Hezbollah is the problem, not Lebanon.dhoar4 wrote:
No. Lebanon are full of Muslim dickheads who have no goal in life, other than to help Al-Qaeda to blow up every normal nation.
To be honest, Israel should have kept it up. The less lebonese we have in the world, the better...
Any sympathy for the third of Lebanon who are Maronite Christians? Never mind.dhoar4 wrote:
No. Lebanon are full of Muslim dickheads who have no goal in life, other than to help Al-Qaeda to blow up every normal nation.
To be honest, Israel should have kept it up. The less lebonese we have in the world, the better...
Same shit...Different smell...lolAlbertWesker[RE] wrote:
I think that is a little to broad of a generalization my man, I agree with your first point, but not all Lebanese are pro Hezbollah/terrorists. Hezbollah is the problem, not Lebanon.dhoar4 wrote:
No. Lebanon are full of Muslim dickheads who have no goal in life, other than to help Al-Qaeda to blow up every normal nation.
To be honest, Israel should have kept it up. The less lebonese we have in the world, the better...
Hey you got rid of Che, thank god , I can't stand his ugly mug. (Oh boy now you're going to put him back up)CameronPoe wrote:
Any sympathy for the third of Lebanon who are Maronite Christians? Never mind.dhoar4 wrote:
No. Lebanon are full of Muslim dickheads who have no goal in life, other than to help Al-Qaeda to blow up every normal nation.
To be honest, Israel should have kept it up. The less lebonese we have in the world, the better...
Agreed, but I do think they need to get rid of or atleast control Hezbollah. Then, I'd have no problem with it.sergeriver wrote:
Israel should give help to Lebanon, since that's the best way to prove they want to end the war, and getting along with their neighnours, because if they want peace they have to accept each other, then Israel must help Lebanon. This way, other muslim countries would consider Israel better. Too naive?? I don't think so.
LMAOHM1{N} wrote:
You DO realize that your signature explains Israel to a "T", right?AlbertWesker[RE] wrote:
No because Lebanon has already confirmed they will be granted as much money as they need from Iran to rebuild everything.
But more on topic, why in the hell should Israel pay for rebuilding civilian structures of a civilian population that has ACCEPTED and let Hezbollah infest and fester. Well than Hezbollah or Lebanon needs to pay for the rebuilding of certain spots in Northern Israel even though the rockets didn't do too much damage.
They already are.Kmarion wrote:
How about Iran paying to rebuild Lebanon?
Much rather have my tax money go towards rebuilding Lebanon rather then building more weapons for Israel.EricTViking wrote:
Even better - get the USA to pay for all the damage.
Good call.PRiMACORD wrote:
Much rather have my tax money go towards rebuilding Lebanon rather then building more weapons for Israel.EricTViking wrote:
Even better - get the USA to pay for all the damage.
They attempted to force public support to turn against Hizballah (or Hamas in the case of Palestine) through collective punishment. Regardless of their intent, that is terrorism.AlbertWesker[RE] wrote:
You do realize that you are wrong, they did not use force or intimidation for a political or idelogical change, the whole point of them invading was self defense........do you read the news?
Here's a thought:Kmarion wrote:
How about Iran paying to rebuild Lebanon?
Last edited by Bubbalo (2006-08-16 18:56:10)
Last edited by GunSlinger OIF II (2006-08-16 19:02:35)
thats the difference between a warzone and a civil area. its collective punishment because these are terrorists homes. if they decided to no longer be a combatant in the war against israel, then their families wouldnt be collective punishment. they made the decisions that put their families and neighborhoods in the crosshairs of the IDF, not the IDF. The community is not just as guilty, but they lend their support. If haji gave a fuck about his loved ones, there would be no punishment. Suicide is a selfish thing, knowing that your family will forever live in worse poverty after you press the kaboom button.Bubbalo wrote:
No, collective punishment causes the punished to view the punisher as the attacker, and the terrorists as defenders/guardians. Further, regardless of effectiveness, doesn't it go against that whole "innocent until proven guilty" thing you Americans are so fond of?