Evidence?Pubic wrote:
This is just wild speculation of course, but this sort of situation wouldn't surprise me:
Hezbollah soldier: Can I launch rockets from your house?
Owner: No
*hezbollah soldier points gun at owner*
Hezbollah soldier: Can I launch rockets from your house?
Owner: No
*hezbollah soldier shoots owner, launches rockets and says the owner died in the bombing that ensues*
What do the first 5 words say in Pubic's post?Bubbalo wrote:
Evidence?Pubic wrote:
This is just wild speculation of course, but this sort of situation wouldn't surprise me:
Hezbollah soldier: Can I launch rockets from your house?
Owner: No
*hezbollah soldier points gun at owner*
Hezbollah soldier: Can I launch rockets from your house?
Owner: No
*hezbollah soldier shoots owner, launches rockets and says the owner died in the bombing that ensues*
Hmmm. The US Government provides schools and hospitals that no one else can... They try to win our trust, then they let a terrorist attack or two slip through and use our patriotism to fight their wars. Perhaps, GASP, the US government is just like hezbollah!fadedsteve wrote:
Its true, some civilians are staying behind to help house and resuppy hezbollah guerillas. . .its known, what dont you get about that! Hezbollah has completely infiltrated that government, and country, the people love them, because they provide services the government cant! Hezbollah has schools, hospitals etc. very similar to what the Mob did in their early existence!! Its all very sick, what these terrorist organizations do!! They brainwash, and indoctrinate people to their side, because they can, and the governments cant stop them!!Jusster wrote:
I don't doubt that they are firing from your stated locations..............but even your last statement does not answer my question. You stated as fact that the Lebanese civilians are willingly staying so that Hezballah can use there property to launch attacks. These are the comments your are defending right?ATG wrote:
Fuck, does it have to be CNN before you'll get it into your thick skull??
Off with you.
If you don't think Hezbollah is operating from civilian areas including school yards, mosques and apartment buildings you are HOPELESS!!!Hey I know a good place to look.........Try FOXSabertooth71 wrote:
Most of the so-called civillians are the ones who let Hezbollah launch from their property.
The Lebanese are pawns for Hezbollah to use and manipulate, its disturbing to watch!! They have been doing that to the Lebanese since their inception in the early 80's!! These groups are so sadistic and sick, they need to be taken out!! NO CEASEFIRE until they are removed completely. . . .we need to thank Israel for saving us the time and effort!!
I do not doubt that there are "some" civilians who would stay behind to fight and/or help Hezballah. But you in know way can insinuate that "most" of the civilians trapped in southern Lebanon are there for that reason.fadedsteve wrote:
Its true, some civilians are staying behind to help house and resuppy hezbollah guerillas. . .its known, what dont you get about that! Hezbollah has completely infiltrated that government, and country, the people love them, because they provide services the government cant! Hezbollah has schools, hospitals etc. very similar to what the Mob did in their early existence!! Its all very sick, what these terrorist organizations do!! They brainwash, and indoctrinate people to their side, because they can, and the governments cant stop them!!
The Lebanese are pawns for Hezbollah to use and manipulate, its disturbing to watch!! They have been doing that to the Lebanese since their inception in the early 80's!! These groups are so sadistic and sick, they need to be taken out!! NO CEASEFIRE until they are removed completely. . . .we need to thank Israel for saving us the time and effort!!
Last edited by Jusster (2006-08-11 06:17:29)
Considering that Israel is bombing the crap of anyplace in Lebanon that fires rockets, I truly doubt the average Lebanese Joe is willing to let Hezbollah fires rockets from their front yard, specialy if he has a wife and kids inside his house. Its more likely he doesn't have a choice.Bubbalo wrote:
Evidence?Pubic wrote:
This is just wild speculation of course, but this sort of situation wouldn't surprise me:
Hezbollah soldier: Can I launch rockets from your house?
Owner: No
*hezbollah soldier points gun at owner*
Hezbollah soldier: Can I launch rockets from your house?
Owner: No
*hezbollah soldier shoots owner, launches rockets and says the owner died in the bombing that ensues*
Last edited by CameronPoe (2006-08-11 06:37:00)
Damn, I agree with CameronPoe on something.CameronPoe wrote:
What's the big deal? We all know Israel are attacking the wrong country. No need to rub salt in the wound......
Yeah but then I guess it would be nearly logistically impossible for them to go straight for Iran, the next best option you'd have would be pushing back the border attacks.ATG wrote:
Damn, I agree with CameronPoe on something.CameronPoe wrote:
What's the big deal? We all know Israel are attacking the wrong country. No need to rub salt in the wound......
Last edited by kr@cker (2006-08-11 07:30:30)
Yes. Because in airstrikes geographical borders are important. Oh, wait......................kr@cker wrote:
Yeah but then I guess it would be nearly logistically impossible for them to go straight for Iran, the next best option you'd have would be pushing back the border attacks.
Last edited by ATG (2006-08-11 08:00:59)
Last edited by Bubbalo (2006-08-11 08:00:22)
why would you use airstrikes on someone if you didn't have the ability to enforce it with groundpounders?Bubbalo wrote:
Yes. Because in airstrikes geographical borders are important. Oh, wait......................kr@cker wrote:
Yeah but then I guess it would be nearly logistically impossible for them to go straight for Iran, the next best option you'd have would be pushing back the border attacks.
Last edited by M1-Lightning (2006-08-11 08:14:29)
Oh, that's right, because Israelis are pushing straight for Beirut. Oh, wait.............kr@cker wrote:
why would you use airstrikes on someone if you didn't have the ability to enforce it with groundpounders?
Now this is funny............ATG wrote:
Thats right, when Irans president says he has a peaceful intention for his nuclear program, but his actions ( including trying to smuggle yellow cake out of Africa ) indicate he is preparring for war, we have to act on his actions not his words.
And take them out. Before it's too late.
Last edited by Tjasso (2006-08-11 08:29:03)
We can't let Iran and N Korea have nukes because they are less likely to use them wisely. If you think Iran and N. Korea should have nukes just because we do you are ludicrousJusster wrote:
Now this is funny............ATG wrote:
Thats right, when Irans president says he has a peaceful intention for his nuclear program, but his actions ( including trying to smuggle yellow cake out of Africa ) indicate he is preparring for war, we have to act on his actions not his words.
And take them out. Before it's too late.
I wonder why we now have all these countries attempting to obtain nukes. Could it be that we have tons of them? So your going to ride in there on your moral horse chanting none for you? LMAO
That is the reason now we will never stop North Korea or Iran from getting them........even if all the U.N. sanctions in the world say otherwise. You could always start a war right? lol
You want to change the world...........lead by example
Jusster
Last edited by Colfax (2006-08-11 08:51:54)
If you have 2 feet and a will to live, you'll find a way out.Jusster wrote:
There are many civilians trapped in southern Lebanon because they have no way out.
Don't forget land mines.Bubbalo wrote:
Yes, it's not like there's huge amounts of ground to cross, massive aerial attacks or armed militia to worry about.