i think there should be a slit in the tak for the driver to see through and he should be able to look around, by pressing a keyboard button... so he would be able to have a look around the tank. and also introduce anti-material snipers such as the steyr iws 2000, the barrett xm109 or the croatian rt-20, so you could take out tanks and the people in them as well as planes and the turrets on huv's. that would be cool. and also snipers could snipe the driver of a tank through the slit. because unless there is an anti tank or a spec -ops there is no stopping one. tell me what you think.
Meh...
That would be the luckiest shot EVER...
The closest thing to that was DCRealism, which had a commander, gunner, and driver...Commander could look around and say "LEFT" or "RIGHT", the gunner would use the turret, and the driver would drive...
they wouldn't do that since then it would be too much, they're not lettin' the Barrett in, period...
That would be the luckiest shot EVER...
The closest thing to that was DCRealism, which had a commander, gunner, and driver...Commander could look around and say "LEFT" or "RIGHT", the gunner would use the turret, and the driver would drive...
they wouldn't do that since then it would be too much, they're not lettin' the Barrett in, period...
Tanks should have two ppl to operate, one who naviates and one who shoots, this make tanks less n00bish
wrong man, very wrong... theres a mod coming up for bf2 and it has the equivalent of the barrett: the steyr iws 2000.Jeckelcopy wrote:
they're not lettin' the Barrett in, period...
Last edited by zimmer92 (2005-11-27 14:20:54)
While we are making tanks more realistic I would like to add: 120mm shells will definitely take out a UH-60 Blackhawk, (or pretty much any helicopter for that matter). Unless there is some sort lightweight force field armor I don't know about? Very annoying to make that sometimes tricky shot, and the damn thing keeps on flying, half the time it doesn't even make it smoke. The uber unpenetrable windows on the Humvee are kind of annoying too, but not nearly as much MBT shells not ripping a helo to shreds. Oh, and bring back the Howtizer!!! Very fond memories of tagging Hind's and Apaches with that.
I meant EA, not a mod , silly *slap*...zimmer92 wrote:
wrong man, very wrong... theres a mod coming up for bf2 and it has the equivalent of the barrett: the steyr iws 2000.Jeckelcopy wrote:
they're not lettin' the Barrett in, period...
http://www.koreanconflicts.com/images/s … der1tw.jpg
lol soz well anyways i still want the other things to happen. so the tanks are more destructible.Jeckelcopy wrote:
I meant EA, not a mod , silly *slap*...zimmer92 wrote:
wrong man, very wrong... theres a mod coming up for bf2 and it has the equivalent of the barrett: the steyr iws 2000.Jeckelcopy wrote:
they're not lettin' the Barrett in, period...
http://www.koreanconflicts.com/images/s … der1tw.jpg
You know what i think would be a great BF2s improvement? Zimmer92 banned from ever posting again.
i embarrased myself in one post and you now hate me??? too far. this suggestion was made ages ago and you cum up with a smart comment because of that post i made. im ashamed of myself for that and i said sorry, i even deleted the post but no, you still have to make those kind of comments.dobbs wrote:
You know what i think would be a great BF2s improvement? Zimmer92 banned from ever posting again.
lol, you're probably upset because Zimmer had an idea that actually made some since. But I really like the other guys idea, it would be cool if two people had to operate the tank. Like he said, it would make tanks "more n00bish". Tanks should also take one less SRAW/ERYX from the front, back, and side. Then it would make it more realistic.dobbs wrote:
You know what i think would be a great BF2s improvement? Zimmer92 banned from ever posting again.
lol at least i know im getting to you. Oh and it was actually two posts you made a complete ass of yourself. Its seems like you post on here constantly thinking people want to hear what you say. I would stick to playing, something you seem to be pretty good at (<--- nice comment)zimmer92 wrote:
i embarrased myself in one post and you now hate me??? too far. this suggestion was made ages ago and you cum up with a smart comment because of that post i made. im ashamed of myself for that and i said sorry, i even deleted the post but no, you still have to make those kind of comments.dobbs wrote:
You know what i think would be a great BF2s improvement? Zimmer92 banned from ever posting again.
lol yeah i agree. stick to playing.... thats what ill do. two posts???? damn im pathetic.dobbs wrote:
lol at least i know im getting to you. Oh and it was actually two posts you made a complete ass of yourself. Its seems like you post on here constantly thinking people want to hear what you say. I would stick to playing, something you seem to be pretty good at (<--- nice comment)zimmer92 wrote:
i embarrased myself in one post and you now hate me??? too far. this suggestion was made ages ago and you cum up with a smart comment because of that post i made. im ashamed of myself for that and i said sorry, i even deleted the post but no, you still have to make those kind of comments.dobbs wrote:
You know what i think would be a great BF2s improvement? Zimmer92 banned from ever posting again.
You know the M95 is, technically, pretty damn close to an 'anti-material' sniper rifle, right? It's designed -- perhaps not for tanks/apcs -- to pierece engine blocks and obliterate vehicles. One shot against any thing like the non armor vehicles in BF ought to blow the shit out of it -- like the pickup trucks, atv's, fav's etc.zimmer92 wrote:
introduce anti-material snipers such as the ...
How about they just turn that into the BF2 AWP...
uuuuuuh except most modern tanks employ a pariscope-like system where youcan shoot out the sights but the round won't go straight into the drivers skull It'll just bounce around and (hopefully) not into the driver.zimmer92 wrote:
i think there should be a slit in the tak for the driver to see through and he should be able to look around, by pressing a keyboard button... so he would be able to have a look around the tank. and also introduce anti-material snipers such as the steyr iws 2000, the barrett xm109 or the croatian rt-20, so you could take out tanks and the people in them as well as planes and the turrets on huv's. that would be cool. and also snipers could snipe the driver of a tank through the slit. because unless there is an anti tank or a spec -ops there is no stopping one. tell me what you think.
the point with big anti-materials sniper rifles like the steyr iws 2000 or the rt-20 is that they weight around 20 kg and they need two men to be operated.
ohh well. it was just an idea to make tanks more destructible.beeng wrote:
uuuuuuh except most modern tanks employ a pariscope-like system where youcan shoot out the sights but the round won't go straight into the drivers skull It'll just bounce around and (hopefully) not into the driver.zimmer92 wrote:
i think there should be a slit in the tak for the driver to see through and he should be able to look around, by pressing a keyboard button... so he would be able to have a look around the tank. and also introduce anti-material snipers such as the steyr iws 2000, the barrett xm109 or the croatian rt-20, so you could take out tanks and the people in them as well as planes and the turrets on huv's. that would be cool. and also snipers could snipe the driver of a tank through the slit. because unless there is an anti tank or a spec -ops there is no stopping one. tell me what you think.
I think tanks shouldn't be less powerful than they are. There are dozens of way of destroying (At, C4, other tanks or mines) them and they really aren't big hassles. According to me, choppers and planes are more threatening than any other vehicules. Godlike AM snipers rifles ? yes they are. With them you can kill almost anything until 1.5 km and with one shot. Besides they are semi-auto (only iws and xm109 of course, rt-20 and ntw-20 are one shot bolt-action), so their use should be very difficult due to their weight (reducing stamina a lot, jumping not allowed, that kind of thing).
CUM....HAHAHA dude stop posting for your own goodzimmer92 wrote:
i embarrased myself in one post and you now hate me??? too far. this suggestion was made ages ago and you cum up with a smart comment because of that post i made. im ashamed of myself for that and i said sorry, i even deleted the post but no, you still have to make those kind of comments.dobbs wrote:
You know what i think would be a great BF2s improvement? Zimmer92 banned from ever posting again.
you can increase the armor turret rotation speed by changing the mouse sensitive in control option,that's what I call "unrealistic" the armor turret can turn like a CIWS.
each armor should have a fix performance on turret rotation speed..
each armor should have a fix performance on turret rotation speed..
See zimmer?bmyerz85 wrote:
CUM....HAHAHA dude stop posting for your own goodzimmer92 wrote:
i embarrased myself in one post and you now hate me??? too far. this suggestion was made ages ago and you cum up with a smart comment because of that post i made. im ashamed of myself for that and i said sorry, i even deleted the post but no, you still have to make those kind of comments.dobbs wrote:
You know what i think would be a great BF2s improvement? Zimmer92 banned from ever posting again.