I never claimed you misquoted him, because you never heard his original words. Which were, by the way, in arabic. Journalists take liberties with arabic to english translations because the languages do not translate directly.lowing wrote:
See I told ya. LOLjonsimon wrote:
Its easy to make someone sound evil through misquoting. That's the part of the argument my article makes. Until you can dispute that argument, your quotes are useless.lowing wrote:
http://www.brokennewz.com/displaystory. … 357wipeass
http://westernstandard.blogs.com/shotgu … m_the.html
My favorite quote is: “The wave of the Islamic revolution will soon reach the entire world”
I am sure YOU WILL disect this quote into meaning something harmless, but I will take it at face value.
As for the map quote, specifically, he used an arabic phrase that more literally translates to "removed from the pages of history." He also specified the Israeli regime, no the country. Of course, biased American media can't spread anything without Israels OK.
Here is the whole paragragh please point out where I mis quoted him.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0, … 47,00.html
Believe it or not, he has said more than what you cite.
And you speak Arabic? Can you translate it? What does he mean? I wont hold my breath waiting. And for the record, most Persians speak Farsi. [sp?]jonsimon wrote:
I never claimed you misquoted him, because you never heard his original words. Which were, by the way, in arabic. Journalists take liberties with arabic to english translations because the languages do not translate directly.lowing wrote:
See I told ya. LOLjonsimon wrote:
Its easy to make someone sound evil through misquoting. That's the part of the argument my article makes. Until you can dispute that argument, your quotes are useless.
As for the map quote, specifically, he used an Arabic phrase that more literally translates to "removed from the pages of history." He also specified the Israeli regime, no the country. Of course, biased American media can't spread anything without Israels OK.
Here is the whole paragragh please point out where I mis quoted him.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0, … 47,00.html
Believe it or not, he has said more than what you cite.