What about a 7800gt?
1280x1024 75HzCamski wrote:
hey KCDowny, what res do you run BF2 at?
My 17" LCD sux
Edit: Oh shit. wait. This is a 7800gt. Sry, I was at work when I first posted. sry for the confusion.
I FAIL.
There Spawn, saved you some typing
Last edited by King_County_Downy (2006-08-04 23:14:51)
Sober enough to know what I'm doing, drunk enough to really enjoy doing it
You get magical fairies flying around the map and all the tanks are pink if you run a 7800 GT.Ayumiz wrote:
What about a 7800gt?
IT'S THE SAME GOD DAMN THING! Argh.
Well, I like not having XP look like shit (i.e. I like my visual styles), I run mIRC on like 40 channels, I have a firewall, AV, etc.RichyCizzo wrote:
Actually depending on how you tweak your Windows, mine uses only 200mb. Good game to you sir.
So of course yes, you can use like 200MB of RAM, but who does? I'm talking real world here, kthnx.
Not that I care really -- I have 2 gigs.
i coudnt care less if i can make context menus a pretty color or transparent i dont run avs / fiewalls unless i decide to and i dont have a need for more than 1 irc channel which i rarely use anyhow.
in my "real world" i keep it simple like him
in my "real world" i keep it simple like him
As viper said thats the best graphic quality you will get from the game as its on the highest setting, i know cos my two 7800gts are constrained by the game i think a 6800ultra runs everything on high maxed out but i dunno what the fps is like, i get around 125fps on mine all maxed at 1280x1024 at 75hz but im hoping to get a new monitor so i can go to 1680x1050
I heard from several trustworthy sources that there's some texture flickering or other inconsistent look (like... the pixel pattern moving or ... ah I don't know how to describe X-D ) with the 7xxx series... how bad is this?
i believe youre refering to the anti aliasing problem
i think youd have to be a real stickler for absolute perfection of rendering to have this bother you but i could be wrong
i think youd have to be a real stickler for absolute perfection of rendering to have this bother you but i could be wrong
Personally, I think the differences between medium and high settings is barely even noticable (with the exceptions of lighting and view distance). If you can only run on medium settings, rest assured that the differences are very slight. So many people are tripping out over the fact that they think they are missing so much at medium settings and are spending a lot of money to get that extra little bit (myself included). Look at the comparisons in the link and tell me this: How much would you pay for the differences you see between Medium and High settings? $100? $200? $500? $1000? People are doing it every day. Hell I spent $3500 building a rig for BF2. Was it worth it? No.
Follow the link below and click on each of the 5 photos there to compare for yourself (I tried to directly link them each here but hotlinking was blocked):
Scroll down and click the 5 pic comparisons
Tweakguides photo comparisons Low/Med/high
Follow the link below and click on each of the 5 photos there to compare for yourself (I tried to directly link them each here but hotlinking was blocked):
Scroll down and click the 5 pic comparisons
Tweakguides photo comparisons Low/Med/high
Last edited by ShotYourSix (2006-08-05 01:29:39)
http://stormsurge.us/ss/fatmarik wrote:
i just wanna see some screens, that way i am satisfied
Wait that's my 1900 xtx
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Nono, I'm referring to a problem with the AF actually, that makes the textures look... kinda unstable while moving.ﻍﻏﺱﺖﻇﻸﮚ wrote:
i believe youre refering to the anti aliasing problem
i think youd have to be a real stickler for absolute perfection of rendering to have this bother you but i could be wrong
Lol the screens are in poor jpg quality, you can see the artifacts everywhere... of course you can't see a difference between med and high X-DShotYourSix wrote:
Personally, I think the differences between medium and high settings is barely even noticable (with the exceptions of lighting and view distance). If you can only run on medium settings, rest assured that the differences are very slight. So many people are tripping out over the fact that they think they are missing so much at medium settings and are spending a lot of money to get that extra little bit (myself included). Look at the comparisons in the link and tell me this: How much would you pay for the differences you see between Medium and High settings? $100? $200? $500? $1000? People are doing it every day. Hell I spent $3500 building a rig for BF2. Was it worth it? No.
Follow the link below and click on each of the 5 photos there to compare for yourself (I tried to directly link them each here but hotlinking was blocked):
Scroll down and click the 5 pic comparisons
Tweakguides photo comparisons Low/Med/high
I run it at 200MB with default XP style, AIM, Ventrilo, Xfire, BF2CC. I'm 1337 at tweaking. I also have a firewall, anti-virus, and a third party computer monitoring program. (Samurize)Viper007Bond wrote:
Well, I like not having XP look like shit (i.e. I like my visual styles), I run mIRC on like 40 channels, I have a firewall, AV, etc.RichyCizzo wrote:
Actually depending on how you tweak your Windows, mine uses only 200mb. Good game to you sir.
So of course yes, you can use like 200MB of RAM, but who does? I'm talking real world here, kthnx.
Not that I care really -- I have 2 gigs.
thanks for all the help guys, but anyway has someone tried the 7300
I use a Radeon ATI X700 card everything is set to max, I admit I've got 4gig of ram running AMD Athlon 64x, here is some screens
nice...
7600GT, worth every penny
Probably is but ATI X700 was all I could afford at the time and I'm happy with it.
How Do U Tweak It Someone Please Tell Me?
i want to know too cause i just got 1 but am waiting for m/b ,currently using agpfatmarik wrote:
thanks for all the help guys, but anyway has someone tried the 7300
These are the only three I have uploaded. I use a 7600gt. Some of them may look crappy because they've been downsized, but I play with everything on high.
[Blinking eyes thing]
Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/tzyon
Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/tzyon
yes but what about a 7300gs?
IT'S THE SAME FUCKING THING! How many times do I have to say this? High is high. What video card you have does NOT affect how the game looks, the settings do.rootbeer73 wrote:
yes but what about a 7300gs?