get this book. Saddams secrets

2006-08-03 14:30:10

#1

beerface702: Member; +65|6936|las vegas

It's written by an ex iraqi airforce pilot who served in saddams airforce in the 80's

it exposes alot of things, and the reason we went to iraq

tells of the movement of large cache's of biological weapons to syria. which know harbours them 3 months ebfore the current strike in iraq.

alot of other things

they actually have footage of supposed transport of scud's and other weapons into syria from aerial satellites

but somehow it was washed out in the anti war propoganda of 03

2006-08-03 17:45:38

#2

ATG: Banned; +5,233|6772|Global Command

I heard a interview with this guy. He pretty much puts to rest any notion that Sadam didn't have WMD's.
He describes the plane flights delivering them to Syria. The authors name is Georges Sada.
Heres a link and ( catch ) some karma +.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/159145 … p;n=283155

Last edited by Alexanderthegrape (2006-08-03 18:38:58)

2006-08-03 17:48:02

#3

SEREMAKER: BABYMAKIN EXPERT √; +2,187|6811|Mountains of NC

I'm buying that unless my libary has it

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/17445/carhartt.jpg

2006-08-03 17:49:01

#4

Ikarti: Banned - for ever.; +231|6952|Wilmington, DE, US

So Syria has the WMDs now? TIME TO INVADE!!!!111111

2006-08-03 18:32:32

#5

fadedsteve: GOP Sympathizer; +266|6733|Menlo Park, CA

+1 for the link and to who started the thread!!

This general is great!! He essentially says Saddam HAD weapons NO DOUBT about it!! which puts nay sayers to bed with their theory that Saddam didnt have weapons!! This guy worked for Saddam for christs sake!! Read the book and get caught up!!

Anyone who thinks Saddam didnt ditch his weapons IS UNINFORMED!!

I'm sick and tired of people saying "where are the weapons", when they have been hidden IN SYRIA!!! This guy knows all the in's and out's of this regime, its time to listen to an authority on this issue. I choose to read him over some defeatist beaurocratic liberal asshole who is suffering from not only treason, but a severe case of rectal cranial inversion!!!

Last edited by fadedsteve (2006-08-03 18:34:26)

2006-08-03 19:00:30

#6

Ikarti: Banned - for ever.; +231|6952|Wilmington, DE, US

fadedsteve wrote:
+1 for the link and to who started the thread!!

This general is great!! He essentially says Saddam HAD weapons NO DOUBT about it!! which puts nay sayers to bed with their theory that Saddam didnt have weapons!! This guy worked for Saddam for christs sake!! Read the book and get caught up!!

Anyone who thinks Saddam didnt ditch his weapons IS UNINFORMED!!

I'm sick and tired of people saying "where are the weapons", when they have been hidden IN SYRIA!!! This guy knows all the in's and out's of this regime, its time to listen to an authority on this issue. I choose to read him over some defeatist beaurocratic liberal asshole who is suffering from not only treason, but a severe case of rectal cranial inversion!!!

Speaking of uninformed...

Even if it's true, we went to war with Iraq and are currently occupying it. There are no weapons in Iraq. This man claims they are in Syria. Iraq is not Syria. Doesn't change the fabricated "evidence." WHO WANTS SOME DELICIOUS NIGERIEN YELLOWCAKE?

You know what's treason? Outting CIA operatives like Dick did. Oh, do I need to add "allegedly?" Also how do we feel about war profiteering? And how about just plain old putting personal interests above that of a nation?

2006-08-03 19:04:07

#7

arson: Member; +99|6879|New York

Sounds like a very reliable source an Iranian named George trying to sell a book, and we can verify his story how?

2006-08-03 19:11:43

#8

Ikarti: Banned - for ever.; +231|6952|Wilmington, DE, US

While I admire that all of the profits of the book go to help Middle Eastern children, I do question the veracity of "Some guys told me they flew the WMDs to Syria," and the fact that he's a born again Christian.

2006-08-03 19:34:57

#9

fadedsteve: GOP Sympathizer; +266|6733|Menlo Park, CA

Outing CIA operatives?? First of all (Valerie Plame) WAS NOT a field operative!! Where are the charges, oh thats right, THEY WERE DROPPED!!! NO indictment whatsover. . . .so nothing is going to happen to Dick Cheney SORRY BUDDY. .

We are not "occupying" it, we have 130,000 troops protecting the government of Iraq(fledgling yes, but none the less an INDEPENDENT government, who asked us to remain for security purposes). They (Iraqi government) has complete soveriegnty over their lands etc. YES, we are their, but we are by no means "occupying" Iraq. . . . babysitting is a better word to use!

Your right Iraq is not Syria nice job!! But Syria is a state sponsored government of terrorism, and needs to be attacked!! Assad needs to be removed from power, once he's gone, more puzzles to this picture will probably be better unveiled (ie knowledge of where the weapons went). . .

Last edited by fadedsteve (2006-08-03 19:39:19)

2006-08-03 19:37:02

#10

BigmacK: Back from the Dead.; +628|6993|Chicago.

I can't wait to get this book.

2006-08-03 19:51:21

#11

alpinestar: Member; +304|6839|New York City baby.

on my list to read.

2006-08-03 20:09:12

#12

Bubbalo: The Lizzard; +541|6804

If they have the footage, why hasn't Bush been going on about it?

2006-08-03 20:12:04

#13

T0rr3nt: Member; +54|6820|Michigan

SEREMAKER wrote:
I'm buying that unless my libary has it

while youre there get a dictionary

2006-08-03 20:13:09

#14

T0rr3nt: Member; +54|6820|Michigan

fadedsteve wrote:
Outing CIA operatives?? First of all (Valerie Plame) WAS NOT a field operative!! Where are the charges, oh thats right, THEY WERE DROPPED!!! NO indictment whatsover. . . .so nothing is going to happen to Dick Cheney SORRY BUDDY. .

We are not "occupying" it, we have 130,000 troops protecting the government of Iraq(fledgling yes, but none the less an INDEPENDENT government, who asked us to remain for security purposes). They (Iraqi government) has complete soveriegnty over their lands etc. YES, we are their, but we are by no means "occupying" Iraq. . . . babysitting is a better word to use!

Your right Iraq is not Syria nice job!! But Syria is a state sponsored government of terrorism, and needs to be attacked!! Assad needs to be removed from power, once he's gone, more puzzles to this picture will probably be better unveiled (ie knowledge of where the weapons went). . .

shhhh, go to sleep.

!!!!

2006-08-03 20:14:42

#15

kr@cker: Bringin' Sexy Back!; +581|6792|Southeastern USA

Bubbalo wrote:
If they have the footage, why hasn't Bush been going on about it?

basic rule of warfare, don't tip your hand, it may involve revealing intel capabilities in the country's in question

I've been looking for a while, but does anyone have any of the pics of trucks and trains hauling ass out of Iraq during the 6 month UN stall? I wasn't online much then, and most of my searches lead to propaganda pages of both sides of the argument

edit: you don't really think the recon photo quality that they show us on the news hasn't improved since the U2 do you? If I had a bitch ass eye in the sky I would blur it up a bit so as to not reveal my full capabilities

Last edited by kr@cker (2006-08-03 20:16:56)

2006-08-03 20:23:49

#16

Bubbalo: The Lizzard; +541|6804

Uh-huh, sure..........only problem with your theory is that it doesn't reveal intel capabilities. They already know America has satellites.

2006-08-03 20:34:10

#17

kr@cker: Bringin' Sexy Back!; +581|6792|Southeastern USA

yes but they don't know just how well the optics of the sats and recon planes work, aside from schwarzkopf showing a pic or 2 that showed saddams limo and letting it slip that they knew it was his by the license plate
(the publicized pics were again not much better than, say, those of the cuban nukes

2006-08-03 20:52:48

#18

fadedsteve: GOP Sympathizer; +266|6733|Menlo Park, CA

T0rr3nt wrote:
fadedsteve wrote:
Outing CIA operatives?? First of all (Valerie Plame) WAS NOT a field operative!! Where are the charges, oh thats right, THEY WERE DROPPED!!! NO indictment whatsover. . . .so nothing is going to happen to Dick Cheney SORRY BUDDY. .

We are not "occupying" it, we have 130,000 troops protecting the government of Iraq(fledgling yes, but none the less an INDEPENDENT government, who asked us to remain for security purposes). They (Iraqi government) has complete soveriegnty over their lands etc. YES, we are their, but we are by no means "occupying" Iraq. . . . babysitting is a better word to use!

Your right Iraq is not Syria nice job!! But Syria is a state sponsored government of terrorism, and needs to be attacked!! Assad needs to be removed from power, once he's gone, more puzzles to this picture will probably be better unveiled (ie knowledge of where the weapons went). . .
shhhh, go to sleep.

!!!!

Typical liberal response. . .

Dont respond if you dont have anything constructive to add . . .

Last edited by fadedsteve (2006-08-03 20:55:46)

2006-08-03 21:11:30

#19

kr@cker: Bringin' Sexy Back!; +581|6792|Southeastern USA

indictment is not a conviction, besides, turns out Novack learned her identity by looking her up in a "Who's Who of Washington", nominated by her husband, not exactly something you do in covert ops

2006-08-03 21:15:31

#20

Bubbalo: The Lizzard; +541|6804

kr@cker wrote:
yes but they don't know just how well the optics of the sats and recon planes work, aside from schwarzkopf showing a pic or 2 that showed saddams limo and letting it slip that they knew it was his by the license plate

And you need more detail to spot a license plate than a missile?

Also, your assumption that the pictures have greatly improved isn't necesssarily true. For one, the pictures are being taken by satellites rather than aircraft, meaning even if technology improves the pictures might be of similar quality. For another, technology eventually hits a wall. Military cameras may have already hit that wall.

2006-08-03 21:29:35

#21

SEREMAKER: BABYMAKIN EXPERT √; +2,187|6811|Mountains of NC

T0rr3nt wrote:
SEREMAKER wrote:
I'm buying that unless my libary has it
while youre there get a dictionary

Use proper grammer if you're going to correct me.

2006-08-03 21:31:38

#22

kr@cker: Bringin' Sexy Back!; +581|6792|Southeastern USA

they were taken from ground, air, and orbit, and I have seen some shit first hand that leads me to believe we have a advanced far beyond the capabilities of the 60's

2006-08-03 23:31:45

#23

K8Kommunist: Member; +26|6809

fadedsteve wrote:
T0rr3nt wrote:
fadedsteve wrote:
Outing CIA operatives?? First of all (Valerie Plame) WAS NOT a field operative!! Where are the charges, oh thats right, THEY WERE DROPPED!!! NO indictment whatsover. . . .so nothing is going to happen to Dick Cheney SORRY BUDDY. .

We are not "occupying" it, we have 130,000 troops protecting the government of Iraq(fledgling yes, but none the less an INDEPENDENT government, who asked us to remain for security purposes). They (Iraqi government) has complete soveriegnty over their lands etc. YES, we are their, but we are by no means "occupying" Iraq. . . . babysitting is a better word to use!

Your right Iraq is not Syria nice job!! But Syria is a state sponsored government of terrorism, and needs to be attacked!! Assad needs to be removed from power, once he's gone, more puzzles to this picture will probably be better unveiled (ie knowledge of where the weapons went). . .
shhhh, go to sleep.

!!!!
Typical liberal response. . .

Dont respond if you dont have anything constructive to add . . .

Your response is

typical liberal response

...and you're criticizing his response as unconstructive?

I love partisan zealots, they do little but make themselves look stupid at every turn.

2006-08-03 23:33:28

#24

Bubbalo: The Lizzard; +541|6804

kr@cker wrote:
they were taken from ground, air, and orbit, and I have seen some shit first hand that leads me to believe we have a advanced far beyond the capabilities of the 60's

Where did you see it?

How were the ground photos taken?

The original claim was orbit photos only, comments?

2006-08-03 23:34:13

#25

Spark: liquid fluoride thorium reactor; +874|6917|Canberra, AUS

I actually say I have to agree with half of his response. If you don't have any constructive, then...

But, erm... what's the book?

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
^{~ Richard Feynman}

BF2S Forums get this book. Saddams secrets

fadedsteve wrote:

SEREMAKER wrote:

fadedsteve wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

T0rr3nt wrote:

fadedsteve wrote:

kr@cker wrote:

T0rr3nt wrote:

SEREMAKER wrote:

fadedsteve wrote:

T0rr3nt wrote:

fadedsteve wrote:

kr@cker wrote:

Board footer