Poll

Best Carry Handgun Caliber Ever???

.45acp28%28% - 69
.40 S&w7%7% - 19
10mm Auto2%2% - 7
9MM Luger (9mm Auto)12%12% - 30
.32 Acp0%0% - 0
9x18 Makarov0%0% - 2
.357 Mag/.38 Special8%8% - 21
.44 Mag/ .44 Special6%6% - 16
.45 Colt20%20% - 49
Other, Explain.11%11% - 28
Total: 241
InnerMonkey
Member
+62|6717
To be fair, 99% of the people out there don't know what you're talking about it you just use the term magazine.  I guess I've gotten used to calling them clips just so I don't have to explain.  I've had the same discussion with friends, and I've gone so far as to just ask the folks at the shooting range what they called it.  Most called it a clip.  Even in a lot of store fronts they're labeled as clips and called that by employees.  Sure it's not right, but it's a commonly accepted term. 

There was a time when I made special efforts to be as technically correct as possible when I spoke.  I think it's because I'm from a very rural family (I guess they'd be called rednecks), and as a kid, strove to set myself apart.  Over the years though, most of that has worn off.  I still correct myself (like before your jib above ), but honestly, it doesn't really matter much.  I'll adapt to vernacular just to make communication easier.  Being anal about it only ever made me have to repeat myself or explain what I meant.  That shit gets old after a while
11thdsv
Member
+3|6712|fort worth, tx.
or like on the sks stripper clip A clip helps to load the weapon into a internal magazine a magazine can be removed with ammo inside still. deff a diff between the two and a colt 45 and 45acp is two diff rounds not the same guys. colt 45 is a long revolver bullet and the apc is an automatic pistol cartridge hence apc
D6717C
Anger is a gift
+174|6631|Sin City

My department (Las Vegas Metro P.D.) lets us carry either 9mm .40 or .45 as a primary duty weapon. I carry a .40 Glock 22C. The compensated barrel helps with the recoil from the .40 quite a bit. I would say at least 50% if not more of my department carries the .40, with .45 being the next most popular. Any one of the 3 is highly effective though, people have debated this topic for years and everyone has their opinion. With the 9 you get higher capacity magazines with less recoil. The .40 kicks like a donkey in most handguns. The .45 has less capacity, but is a large round that is tried and proven.

Bottom line is, it matters 100% more WHERE YOU HIT THEM, not what you shoot them with. I have seen people shot multiple times with various size rounds, and what it always came down to was the location they were hit. You can have the biggest gun in the world, but if you don't train with it or know how to use it then you might as well sell it.
Agent_Dung_Bomb
Member
+302|6734|Salt Lake City

D6717C wrote:

My department (Las Vegas Metro P.D.) lets us carry either 9mm .40 or .45 as a primary duty weapon. I carry a .40 Glock 22C. The compensated barrel helps with the recoil from the .40 quite a bit. I would say at least 50% if not more of my department carries the .40, with .45 being the next most popular. Any one of the 3 is highly effective though, people have debated this topic for years and everyone has their opinion. With the 9 you get higher capacity magazines with less recoil. The .40 kicks like a donkey in most handguns. The .45 has less capacity, but is a large round that is tried and proven.

Bottom line is, it matters 100% more WHERE YOU HIT THEM, not what you shoot them with. I have seen people shot multiple times with various size rounds, and what it always came down to was the location they were hit. You can have the biggest gun in the world, but if you don't train with it or know how to use it then you might as well sell it.
That's true.  That's also why I made sure to keep enough of the Black Talon rounds to fill one magazine after that ammo was removed from the market.
JG1567JG
Member
+110|6587|United States of America

[JiF]Timmay! wrote:

alien-DSW-Gen wrote:

.45 is great, but you cant fit as many in a mag. Also they cost more per round then say 9mm. That was another major deciding factor for me to go with the .40, cost to shoot it.
Does how many you can stuff into a mag really mean much any more? I thought they had banned the making of new high-cap mags years ago (in the US, at least) and pre-ban mags are insanely expensive.. OTOH, if you've got the money, you can still find 15 round mags that'll fit in a .45 Glock 21. It's heavy but will get pretty much any job done.
The law banning the number of rounds a magazine can hold sunsetted/expired with the Clinton Cosmetic gun ban.  Any laws left that limit the number of rounds in a Mag. are only local state laws.

I carry a Glock model 23 (.40 cal.).  This gun came with 2-10rnd mags and I later bought 2-13rnd mags after the law sunsetted. They only cost around $25 USD. 
I think it was "Bostons Gun Bible" where I read that the .40 cal. had either 92% or 95% of the Kinetic energy as the .45 apc.  Kinetic energy = Stopping Power
Stubbee
Religions Hate Facts, Questions and Doubts
+223|6741|Reality

SealXo wrote:

I say .45 all the way 9mm is german and im not to cool with the nazis.
Not cool to equate germans with nazis

Not at all the same thing.
The US economy is a giant Ponzi scheme. And 'to big to fail' is code speak for 'niahnahniahniahnah 99 percenters'
AlbertWesker[RE]
Not Human Anymore
+144|6642|Seattle, WA

Stubbee wrote:

SealXo wrote:

I say .45 all the way 9mm is german and im not to cool with the nazis.
Not cool to equate germans with nazis

Not at all the same thing.
Big +1
The_Fighting_69th
Combat medic
+6|6751
I carry a full size 1911 with a little .380 as my back-up gun.  I don't care for the 9x19mm at all.  I guess people who are recoil sensitive should use it, but I need something bigger...

1st rule of a gunfight, bring a long gun...
2nd rule, your back-up gun's caliber should start with a 4
3rd, bring a bunch of friends with guns...


On the Army going back to a .45ACP, it's kinda ironic isn't it?  They had a little round about .38 caliber and had problems with it so they switched to the .45 Long colt.  Then back to .38 caliber.  Then the little incident in the Phillipians (sp?).  here comes the M1911 in .45ACP, then to the 9mm.  Now going back to .45ACP....
alien-DSW-Gen
Hates snipers and says the "F" word a lot
+72|6672|Houston, Texas

[JiF]Timmay! wrote:

alien-DSW-Gen wrote:

.45 is great, but you cant fit as many in a mag. Also they cost more per round then say 9mm. That was another major deciding factor for me to go with the .40, cost to shoot it.
Does how many you can stuff into a mag really mean much any more? I thought they had banned the making of new high-cap mags years ago (in the US, at least) and pre-ban mags are insanely expensive.. OTOH, if you've got the money, you can still find 15 round mags that'll fit in a .45 Glock 21. It's heavy but will get pretty much any job done.
Acctually that is a state per state basis. In Texas, you can purchase the same size magizines that law enforcement officers use... I live in Texas.  But I was refering in general to the fact that due to the larger bullets regardless of higher capacity magizines or not, the .40's offer a higher # of bullets per clip compared to the .45. It's only one or 2 bullets i think in the compact glocks for example... but i'd rather have one or two extra just incase.

Also a side note, the glock 22's mag fits right into a glock27, so you can use the full size mag in your compact if needed.

Last edited by alien-DSW-Gen (2006-08-01 01:12:31)

BVC
Member
+325|6694
The closest thing I've used to a handgun is my Desert Eagle airsoft pistol, so null vote for me.
alien-DSW-Gen
Hates snipers and says the "F" word a lot
+72|6672|Houston, Texas
Also a side note. Yes the proper term from the manufacture or community, military, whoever, is magizine. This post is about ammo, lets not get our panties in a roar because someone said clip. You knew what they ment, that is what really matters on this discussion - the ammo!
jmbbf1975
Member
+1|6652
Well since the question is "best carry handgun ever"  My opinion is  Smith and Wesson Peacemaker, the gun that "won the west"

I currently own a few pistols and rifles and being in the People' Socialist Republic of California they are all "not evil".
I own lots of Ruger stuff, P-97 (.45 ACP)  P-95 (9mm) Mini-14 (.223 Remington) and a 10/22 (.22 LR)
I also have a Romanian SKS (7.62 X 39mm) and a Mosin Naggant M-44 carbine (7.62 X54R)

I keep my P-97 good to go all the time just in case I need it quick (god forbid).  I load it with my own special brew of Vitavhori (spelling) powder (yes I reload), 230 grain Speer gold dot (that's a hollow point for those who don't know), winchester brass and federal primers. 
I use a Dillon AT 540 press (i think that's the model number i got it 5 years ago so the memory fades me) with dies for .45 ACP and .223 (for the Mini-14).
I have never had any kind of malfunction with my P-97 and it does just fine with the +P ammo (corbon 200 grain is what I shot). It also does really well with the Federal Hydra shock 230 grain ammo.
Intheshadows
Member
+5|6542
.40 is the best compromise in stopping power, penatration and ammo capacity.

Say what you may about aiming or intelligent shooting but a revolver is not going to be any good in a prolonged firefight. Yes most engagements are quick and invovle relatively short exchanges if not being a one sided gunfight. However how many times have you seen standoff situations turn into prolonged firefights? It happens both to law enforcement and civilians. You place 2 or more armed people in a situation with some cover and both are going to exchange rounds in the interest of removing the threat.

D6717C wrote:

My department (Las Vegas Metro P.D.) lets us carry either 9mm .40 or .45 as a primary duty weapon. I carry a .40 Glock 22C. The compensated barrel helps with the recoil from the .40 quite a bit. I would say at least 50% if not more of my department carries the .40, with .45 being the next most popular. Any one of the 3 is highly effective though, people have debated this topic for years and everyone has their opinion. With the 9 you get higher capacity magazines with less recoil. The .40 kicks like a donkey in most handguns. The .45 has less capacity, but is a large round that is tried and proven.

Bottom line is, it matters 100% more WHERE YOU HIT THEM, not what you shoot them with. I have seen people shot multiple times with various size rounds, and what it always came down to was the location they were hit. You can have the biggest gun in the world, but if you don't train with it or know how to use it then you might as well sell it.
Has the issue of reduced night vision ever been brought up or discussed in your department? Also have you fired it in low light conditions to observe the affects? I own a 23 and have fired a 22 and 27 both owned and carried by my brother as his duty and backup respectively. However I have never had a chance to test the claims especially with the hot loads most people carry on duty. I know his department doesnt allow them to carry compensated weapons.

The only experience I have had personally is firing my bushmaster carbon 15 and firing my brothers LE M4 with flash supressor. The difference was night and day. The .223 round can produce some amazing muzzle flash unsupressed.  I know with the .40 you are talking about a substantially less amount of powder but it still throws gasses up. Something to research deff.

Last edited by Intheshadows (2006-08-01 01:59:04)

|-LoNgHiLL-|
Member Member
+7|6560|Classified

AlbertWesker[RE] wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

cant wait till the army goes back to the M1911 (it could happen)
SOCOM is already looking for a JCP (Joint Combat Pistol) that is eventually going to replace the M9...... hopefully.
The JCP program has been scaled back and the Army dropped out of it; it is now the CP program...
Horseman 77
Banned
+160|6835
" best compromise " why compromise? 

.45 No contest, not to mention that bad guys melt when you point it at them. I have heard them blubber things like,

" I wanna to go home ! "

I was dumb founded.

Last edited by Horseman 77 (2006-08-01 06:55:37)

herrr_smity
Member
+156|6626|space command ur anus
454 Casull
Agent_Dung_Bomb
Member
+302|6734|Salt Lake City

Horseman 77 wrote:

" best compromise " why compromise? 

.45 No contest, not to mention that bad guys melt when you point it at them. I have heard them blubber things like,

" I wanna to go home ! "

I was dumb founded.
Because the .45APC is not the best for what some people want.  The .45 lacks capacity, the 9mm lacks the power.  The .40 is a good compromise to get the best of both.

The bore on the .40 is quite a bit larger than the 9mm, and people will know very well they are looking at a larger calibre weapon if you point it at them.
tvmissleman
The Cereal Killer
+201|6657| United States of America
.357 Magnum all the way
Sydney
2λчиэλ
+783|6842|Reykjavík, Iceland.
.44 ftw!

"This is the most powerful handgun in the world, it will blow your head clean off, and I don't knew whether I fired 5 or 6 bullets, so, do you feel lucky? Punk!"
BADHEAD
Member
+6|6497|Oblivion

herrr_smity wrote:

454 Casull
Ok ....
Well everyone wants to be Dirty Harry.  I always love it when someone goes to the total extreme.
9mm is more than fine.
Most handgun fights happen at 5-7 yards. Who cares if it drops energy at 25 yards. Top 9mm loads hit 400 + Footpounds. The idea is to put a bullets where you want them.
I like the ballistic numbers on the .40 and 10mm.  Both of these are great new loads.
Brasso
member
+1,549|6629

10mm auto, you gotta love Glocks.
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
Horseman 77
Banned
+160|6835

Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:

Horseman 77 wrote:

" best compromise " why compromise? 

.45 No contest, not to mention that bad guys melt when you point it at them. I have heard them blubber things like,

" I wanna to go home ! "

I was dumb founded.
Because the .45APC is not the best for what some people want.  The .45 lacks capacity, the 9mm lacks the power.  The .40 is a good compromise to get the best of both.

The bore on the .40 is quite a bit larger than the 9mm, and people will know very well they are looking at a larger calibre weapon if you point it at them.
I hear you. I think capacity is a real concern for one in uniform, I am not.
I used to be a capacity minded person. But I have only fired 4 shots in anger on three occasions 2, 1 and 1

The Compromise I will lean to is carry-ability, The shitty caliber you carry on you will out preform the one you left home because it was to awkward to carry. So I am guilty of procuring a Walther ppk 380.

" keep it coming "
blademaster
I'm moving to Brazil
+2,075|6643
Magnum
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,053|6770|PNW

I'm going with .38 on this, because they have enough stopping power on their own, and because their weapons are generally light and small enough to carry about adequately concealed in public.

Also, hammerless revolvers are great, because you can fire them without even drawing from such a place as your coat pocket, and without worrying about some mechanism catching on material.

Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2006-08-01 08:34:09)

SEREMAKER
BABYMAKIN EXPERT √
+2,187|6567|Mountains of NC

I have a good amount of guns that I ahve collected over time and I'm always looking to expand my collection, during the hot days I keep my glock 26 on my hip with Federal 9mm Premium Hydra-Shok (135 gr) or Winchester 9mm Black Talons ( 147 gr) and Beretta Bobcat .25 AUTO with Winchester .25 AP Postive Expanding Point ( 45 gr ) during the colder days where I can wear a jacket or a pull over I wear my Colt 1911-A1 70 series with Winchester .45 ACP Black Talons
I have several other concealed carry guns but these are my primarys - I also have guns in the other calibers but I shoot almost everyday ( I wish everyday but things happen ) and I go through the same techniques from what I was taught in the marines and I put 2 in the chest 1 in the head from rapid fire too moving targets
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/17445/carhartt.jpg

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard