thinner44
Member
+1|7019
I like the sigs (don't use them myself), especially 'the_heart_attack' ones, I'm not sure whether to play Bf2 or rush down to the beach (which would be silly, it's freezin' in the UK), although I do understand the 'loads on the machines'. But it's your site, you do what you think is best for speed and performance I'm just pleased there's somewhere to come for 'reasonably sensible' conversations.
YitEarp
Member
+1|6935

Krappyappy wrote:

i think the most annoying thing is the oversized sigs. as long as people keep it small and within the content limits of the site, it's not so bad.

the 'softcore porn' sigs from tehsig.com are prevalent because it's a large part of the culture from those forums. again, as long as they're small and show no 'unacceptable nudity' [nipples, pubic hair, sexual organs] then there should be no objection. it's no worse than what's on cable tv, after all.

of course i'm biased...
it shouldnt be a problem, but at work and whatnot it is.  thankfully i dont have a problem with video game images at my work, but the porn-ish stuff is a nono.  which is why im annoyed somewhat that the only recourse i appear to have is to turn off all sigs or i have to view 400+ pixel images of softcore and kiddie porn lookin crap.

i wouldnt be against either some rules against excessive size or the porn sigs.  most forums have rules regarding sig images, usually seems to be for good reason or it gets crazy outta control and then you have people posting 800pixel images and kiddie porn, etc.

Last edited by YitEarp (2005-12-23 14:31:55)

DakotaDoc64
Member
+0|7002|Omaha, Nebraska

chuyskywalker wrote:

Sigs
These were killing my machine. I have reworked them 4 times now, and each time the load has lessened, but still put my machine way, WAY above what it out to have been. It was too the point, recently, that people were not able to access the site because of the load.

Considering that I am going to implement the Ranking system (sort of as a trade-off) and that other sites out there are doing a far better job than I at providing sigs, BF2S is going to step aside in this arena.



More to come as I celebrate the holidays and get my coding on. Happy holidays!

edit Oh yeah, since sigs are leaving, I may turn avatars and take out the image tag in the sigs. Opinions?[/i]
Chuy, I have always preferred your sigs to any out there I could find.  Have you considered having a sig that is one HTML link instead of four. 

Loved the clean easy to read sigs you had, but this is your site. I however respectfully disagree that others are doing a better job then you.

Have a Merry Christmas and enjoy your holiday break.

Your are my BF2 stats hero, keep up the great work.

Edit:  OK, I guess this Hypernia sig will be ok, [sigh].  A bit busy but does contain a lot of info and blends with your forum nice..

Last edited by DakotaDoc64 (2005-12-23 16:37:53)

Sahasrahla
Code poet
+1|6955|Branson, MO, USA

DakotaDoc64 wrote:

Edit:  OK, I guess this Hypernia sig will be ok.  A bit busy but does contain a lot of info.
Have you seen the BF2s replacement sig template I made for tehsig? It may be to your liking...
PFCStenzel
Check your AA alarm...
+82|7004|Idaho, USA / Age 30
Way to go Chuy!!!
Nikola Bathory
Karkand T-90 0wnage
+163|6996|Bulgaria
My sig for the moment then:
[OvC]_AMD_Man
Member
+2|7025|England

chuyskywalker wrote:

[OvC]_AMD_Man wrote:

with our clan we have on page with each members BF2S sig on, to compare
Use the My Leader Board page for doing that. You can get it set up with all the members of your clan, then share the link out. You'll even be able to sort the players by the various columns on that page.
have done that, but were using the sigs aswell, ah well

imo the BF2S sigs are the best ones i've seen, tehsig ones are ok, and the BF2S lookalike one isn't that bad, but it's just not the same

anyway, merry christmas everyone
Fahrenheit
Member
+0|6988
Have a beer on me dude!! good work and merry xmas!!!
SnobbyBoss
SAS Medic
+18|6950
Why dont you say "Permanently" instead of "Tempoaraly"?. I am talking about where the sigs used to be.

EDIT-- Yes i know i spelles Tempoarly wrong.

Last edited by SnobbyBoss (2005-12-25 09:30:03)

DUFFKING
Insert witty comment here
+3|6968|Brixham, UK
I swear my stats are not updating properly at the moment...
ODDBALL
Member
+0|7000
happy christmas, hope you have a good one.. I agree with all the above, your sig's were by far the coolest
IvysDad
Member
+0|6970|Jacksonville, NC
Oh my!  I can't believe the number of people bitching about Chewy getting rid of the sigs.  I think that since he does all the work, the we should all support him.  He definatly produces an outstanding product.  Chewy I salute you.  Great job!  Keep up the good work and do what you want....I will support you!
SodaBob
Member
+-1|7053|Indiana, US

midgetspy wrote:

No offence to chuy, but the sigs on this site were 10x worse than the sigs offered by other sites (read: tehsig).
That depends on the application.    For my purposes - displaying and giving out sigs to my gaming group (clan) members, tehsigs doesn't work because you have to have a unique email address based account for every sig, and quite honestly you have to have the time and inclination to care about coding their sig.  Now, some folks here have been nice enough to give out their cool sig codes, but many in my clan aren't all that computer literate, etc.

Also, I really liked having the different stats and awards sigs.  Using chuy's xml stats feed, I was able to create a clan stats sig, but it was nice to have just the simple awards (badges, medals, etc) sig.  Heck, I even created our clan stats sig to have the same width as the BF2s.com sigs

The hypernia/tehsigs sigs are neat, since they can be customized, etc.  But for my clan's purposes they aren't very helpful.  And thus far I have yet to find any sigs out there that don't require registration and/or programming.

Also, I like how Chuy had different sigs for stats and awards (as mentioned above, I formatted our clan's sig - see below - so that we could use our custom stats sig and bf2s.com's awards sig in conjunction with each other)

Bob.

Last edited by SodaBob (2005-12-28 10:57:17)

Lt.Maverick|Lw|
youve now just been Pwned by the Mavster
+-1|6934
Chill its Xmas
[OvC]_AMD_Man
Member
+2|7025|England

SodaBob wrote:

midgetspy wrote:

No offence to chuy, but the sigs on this site were 10x worse than the sigs offered by other sites (read: tehsig).
That depends on the application.    For my purposes - displaying and giving out sigs to my gaming group (clan) members, tehsigs doesn't work because you have to have a unique email address based account for every sig, and quite honestly you have to have the time and inclination to care about coding their sig.  Now, some folks here have been nice enough to give out their cool sig codes, but many in my clan aren't all that computer literate, etc.
my point exactly, these huge sigs are just annoying, i loved the simplicity of chuy's sigs, anyhoo, i'll stop moaning now
Xiver
Member
+0|6987
I'm really going to miss the Global Ranking stuff.  I agree it was kind of pointless with the kits, but I liked it in the weapons section.  I'd be interested to know how the new ranking system will work.
Pvt.Kosak
Member
+125|6796
Well we kept the sigs!
Jenspm
penis
+1,716|6942|St. Andrews / Oslo

Why the hell did you necro this thread? It's from 8 months ago ffs!
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/26774/flickricon.png https://twitter.com/phoenix/favicon.ico
JaM3z
Banned
+311|6920

(SGS)Pvt.Kosak wrote:

Well we kept the sigs!
nub
spawnofthemist
Banned
+1,128|6851|Burmecia, Land of the Rain
everyone! attack the nub!

/me takes Kosaks god damn shock paddles away from him so he never revives another 8 month old thread EVER AGAIN.

Last edited by spawnofthemist (2006-07-27 06:22:29)

PspRpg-7
-
+961|6908

JaM3z wrote:

(SGS)Pvt.Kosak wrote:

Well we kept the sigs!
nub

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard