We need to be able to hijack!!!

2006-06-10 00:47:40

#26

Jewbat: Member; +8|6742

No, this is retarded. First of all, the hatched is almost always closed.

Second of all, the people driving the tank won't just let you run off with it, so it should (If it would ever be implemented) have some sort of skill involved with it.

And it should also have a time delay before the same car can be jacked.

2006-06-10 06:26:32

#27

Plisken: POE2 Addict For Life; +21|6596|Vic, Australia

What would you expect, they had it done in a WW2 Steven Spielburg movie. And, might I add, it was cool as f*ck. So for SPITE, I agree with him. It'd be freakin cool as heck.

Though the driver should be able to close and open the hatch on if he wanted.

Yeah there is a slight difference between World War 2 tanks and todays tanks.

HomiE-G-DOG wrote:
u know, being able to hijack vehicles is a pretty good idea. (At least i think so) it'll be perfect for the peeps

that aren't spec ops, anti-tank or engineer. They can make the red "X" sign show up when you're about to be

hiijacked. Let me know what u guys think.

It's a good idea but it would only be light and maybe heavy transports cause ur not going to be able to steal a tank without crippling it first.

2006-06-10 06:30:20

#28

DirtyMexican: I knife Generals; +278|6549|Search Whore killing fields

id riather throw a nade in the tank hatch

2006-06-10 06:32:20

#29

Cybargs: Moderated; +2,285|6728

reminds me of halo

https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png

2006-06-10 06:37:15

#30

Vilham: Say wat!?; +580|6778|UK

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
Spearhead wrote:
mr.widdim wrote:

A. This was already said.

B. Again, exactly like Halo 2.

C. This would never happen in real life.
What would you expect, they had it done in a WW2 Steven Spielburg movie. And, might I add, it was cool as f*ck. So for SPITE, I agree with him. It'd be freakin cool as heck.

Though the driver should be able to close and open the hatch on if he wanted.
the turret dont drive the tank in real life. throw a grenade inside a turret, the tank will still able to maneuver but not fire

you know a turret is directly linked to the rest of the tank, if you lobbed a nade in the hatch it would go down to the bottom of the tank and cripple the entire crew.

2006-06-10 12:25:08

#31

FAF-Teeje: Member; +47|6555

lol. that would be pretty sweet.

2006-06-10 12:33:26

#32

kn0ckahh: Member; +98|6750|netherlands, sweet lake city

it would be fun if the engineer kit had an welder so the could weld a grenade inside the turret of the main gun

2006-06-10 12:37:09

#33

5peedy: Member; +27|6611|the Faroe Islands

kn0ckahh wrote:
it would be fun if the engineer kit had an welder so the could weld a grenade inside the turret of the main gun

NO WAY IN HELL AM I GONNA WELD A GRENADE...

2006-06-10 12:40:14

#34

k1LLr_M: Prone to Own; +118|6605|Houston, TX

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
reminds me of halo

Yeah, for those of you wishing to do this just play halo 2, you can bash open tank cockpits after boarding them and toss nades in. Tons of fun! Also, you can hijack the warthogs (jeeps) and other small vehicles and kick/punch the driver out.

2006-06-10 13:35:50

#35

Spearhead: Gulf coast redneck hippy; +731|6702|Tampa Bay Florida

Plisken wrote:
What would you expect, they had it done in a WW2 Steven Spielburg movie. And, might I add, it was cool as f*ck. So for SPITE, I agree with him. It'd be freakin cool as heck.

Though the driver should be able to close and open the hatch on if he wanted.
Yeah there is a slight difference between World War 2 tanks and todays tanks.

HomiE-G-DOG wrote:
u know, being able to hijack vehicles is a pretty good idea. (At least i think so) it'll be perfect for the peeps

that aren't spec ops, anti-tank or engineer. They can make the red "X" sign show up when you're about to be

hiijacked. Let me know what u guys think.
It's a good idea but it would only be light and maybe heavy transports cause ur not going to be able to steal a tank without crippling it first.

So what? If BF2 was realistic, there wouldn't even be soldiers. It would just be a giant nuke fest. I think they have a license for being creative, even though in RL it's not really possible. Besides, I'm pretty sure tanks nowadays have a crew of 5.......... not 1

2006-06-10 13:46:00

#36

david363: Crotch fires and you: the untold story; +314|6751|Comber, Northern Ireland

LT.Victim wrote:
I think this would be a good idea, just as long as you have to thrown a nade into the Turret at the top to kill the guy and jack the tank. At the moment, u can throw a nade into the Open Turret hatch at the top, but the driver wont get damaged, but it does alot more damage to the tank then throwing it on the ground.

like the game mercinaries

2006-06-10 13:55:55

#37

PspRpg-7: -; +961|6710

Trigger_Happy_92 wrote:
i have been thinking about this, but only on the same team. i think higher ranked players should be able to kick out lower ranked players for a specific spot in a vehicle, similar to singleplayer. this could only be done 2 times in a round, to make things fair.

It's called an M95. And that would SUCK all the little colonels and whatnot would be like 'OMFG GTE OWT OF MI JAY TEN OMFGZ0R!!1!11one'

2006-06-10 14:00:34

#38

137twozerosniper: Member; +57|6577|UK

well if i was at war and someone tryed to take my tank or something i would use my gun and BLOW THE SHIT OUT OF THEM!!!

2006-07-21 20:49:53

#39

HomiE-G-DOG: Member; +5|6548|Japan

u can already hijack in a way. all u have to do is jump on top of his tank and wait fer himto get out and take his tank. If he calls on his teammates to kill u, too bad

2006-07-21 21:02:33

#40

ShotYourSix: Boldly going nowhere...; +196|6731|Las Vegas

Half the damn servers anymore wont even let you go in their base and you think they are gonna let you get in their JEEP?

2006-07-23 15:01:42

#41

H0ly(rap: Member; +10|6733|Nebraska

idk to me this sounds like a "special skill" for only like MEC, and only 1 kit would be able to do it or something, cause you don't usually hear about U.S. guys hijacking other peps crap, lol i mean we already have the most advanced stuff in the world, we dont need to hijack, but ya pretty cool idear

2006-07-23 15:04:41

#42

RDMC: Enemy Wheelbarrow Spotted..!!; +736|6577|Area 51

HomiE-G-DOG wrote:
u know, being able to hijack vehicles is a pretty good idea. (At least i think so) it'll be perfect for the peeps

that aren't spec ops, anti-tank or engineer. They can make the red "X" sign show up when you're about to be

hiijacked. Let me know what u guys think.

Make it a new kit, give it some basic guns, knive, pistol, default gun, hijacking gear (No nades,!!!) That would be sweeeet

2006-07-23 15:12:20

#43

KuSTaV: noice; +947|6523|Gold Coast

Cool idea, but the doors are almost always locked.

noice

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/26774/awsmsanta.png

2006-07-23 19:03:20

#44

seymorebutts443: Ready for combat; +211|6607|Belchertown Massachusetts, USA

sounds like someone has been playin to much Mercenaries: Playground of Destruction

2006-07-23 19:05:45

#45

PspRpg-7: -; +961|6710

No, you shouldn't you wanker.

2006-07-27 00:02:58

#46

souljar: Member; +8|6497|Liverpool U.K

Try jacking my j-10 as i go past yo azz doing mach 3 mofo !

2006-07-27 16:47:30

#47

BandoIruka: Member; +1|6506

Someone's been watching too much XXX: State of the Union

EDIT: Don't know what I'm talking about? Just to spoil things abit, an M1 Abrams tank was Hijacked in that movie. Daring, but the tank driver should had known better.

Last edited by BandoIruka (2006-07-27 17:07:47)

BF2S Forums We need to be able to hijack!!!

HomiE-G-DOG wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

Spearhead wrote:

mr.widdim wrote:

kn0ckahh wrote:

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

Plisken wrote:

HomiE-G-DOG wrote:

LT.Victim wrote:

Trigger_Happy_92 wrote:

HomiE-G-DOG wrote:

Board footer