Pages: 1 2 3

 

2006-07-19 06:33:20
BF2Craglyeye
Member
+72|6913|Australia

Bubbalo wrote:

BF2Craglyeye wrote:

Now that is a valid point, but why else would people want something decriminalized if not to exploit it.
Your point?  If it's not illegal, then it doesn't matter.
Pretty much, whats there to get in trouble with criminally if its not criminal anymore??


My point is about peoples motivations.

Edit: While something may be socially unacceptable, its that the people  no longer have the jurisdiction, to deem it illegal under the law.

Last edited by BF2Craglyeye (2006-07-19 06:35:27)

2006-07-19 06:44:47
Rosse_modest
Member
+76|7017|Antwerp, Flanders

BF2Craglyeye wrote:

Rosse_modest wrote:

And indeed, pedophilia is illegal, but as mentioned before these people haven't been proven to be doing anything illegal which they haven't been punished for already. Their views are morally questionable, but not illegal.
Now that is a valid point, but why else would people want something decriminalised if not to exploit it.
There are numerous motivations why any1 would want to decriminalise certain things. I think it is apparent however that in this case they just want to find a way to do what they desire without the risk of being imrisoned for it.

Let's look on the bright side of things. Since these pedophiles have joined up to form a party, they have flagged themselves to be either pedophilic or to have sympathies with pedophiles (yes they undoubtably exist). And unless they have an IQ less than 10, they know it would be retarded for them to actually break the law now regarding underage sex/pornography. Whereas a pedophile in anonymity can just go on about his business.

Last edited by Rosse_modest (2006-07-19 06:48:39)

2006-07-19 07:02:12
Pug
UR father's brother's nephew's former roommate
+652|6783|Texas - Bigger than France
If you wear wooden shoes that long, things like this are bound to happen.

I can't wait to hear this -
Don't blame me...I voted for the pedophile.
2006-07-19 07:20:22
jonsimon
Member
+224|6736
Theres nothing wrong with a political party for pedophilia. Its obviously an unpopular idea, which means it won't gain any support except for the special interest group. So long as the populace never lets them fade into the background they can't get away with anything.
2006-07-19 10:06:49
BF2Craglyeye
Member
+72|6913|Australia

Rosse_modest wrote:

BF2Craglyeye wrote:

Rosse_modest wrote:

And indeed, pedophilia is illegal, but as mentioned before these people haven't been proven to be doing anything illegal which they haven't been punished for already. Their views are morally questionable, but not illegal.
Now that is a valid point, but why else would people want something decriminalised if not to exploit it.
There are numerous motivations why any1 would want to decriminalise certain things. I think it is apparent however that in this case they just want to find a way to do what they desire without the risk of being imrisoned for it.

Let's look on the bright side of things. Since these pedophiles have joined up to form a party, they have flagged themselves to be either pedophilic or to have sympathies with pedophiles (yes they undoubtably exist). And unless they have an IQ less than 10, they know it would be retarded for them to actually break the law now regarding underage sex/pornography. Whereas a pedophile in anonymity can just go on about his business.
Isnt that what I said
2006-07-19 10:30:34
alpinestar
Member
+304|6837|New York City baby.
pedo = wrong period debate only shows 2 sides to it when there should only be one.

 

Pages: 1 2 3

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard