GunSlinger OIF II
Banned.
+1,860|6885
inspired by the Israeli heavy things thread and the fact that I dont want to this stuck on page #14 post #3454368

I live, breathe, eat and shit middle east politics since my time in the box

اﻟﺒﻌﺚ




Hypothesis:  The Baath Arab Socialist Party of Syria (BASP) attributes its foundations to the foreign influences of the German National Socialist party.


Variables: The dependent variable is the formation of the Baath party in Damascus, Syria in 1947.  The independent variable is the policy of foreign aid (economic and military) from Nazi Germany to the founding members of the BASP.



Expectations:  In the presented claim, I would like to find irrefutable evidence showing that Nazi Germany was indirectly responsible for the formation of the Baath party which still exists today.  I hope to discover some form of direct ties between National Socialism and the modern Pan-Arab movement, which the BASP claims to be the driving force behind.



Evidence that supports above claim:

    Europe during the mid-1930’s was politically unstable at best.  New thoughts and ideologies were tested and formulated in governments all around the region leading to the chaos that is known as World War Two.  Fascism, Marxism and National Socialism, words and political systems that were non-existent one hundred years ago before this time, were now responsible for a massive wave of new thought and ideology.  This environment led to the beginning of the modern Pan-Arab movement and the end to European colonialism in the Middle East.
The origins of the Baath Party could be found on the streets of Paris, France during these turbulent times.  Michel Aflaq, a Greek Orthodox Christian and Salah al-Din al-Bitar, a Sunni Muslim, are the two men attributed to the founding of the Baath Party.  Aflaq and al-Bitar were both members of wealthy merchant families in Damascus and were attending the Sorbonne University of Paris.  Here is where these two first organized their Baathist ideology of Arab nationalism and socialism and created Syrian study groups to discuss these radical ideas.  Not only was Arab unity the only topics for discussion but, both men found the Arab situation very similar to the Germans.   In fact, Michel Aflaq was responsible for circulating Arabic translated copies of Mein Kampf to his study group.  He believed that Arabs should use the National Socialist model as a guide to building a unified Arab state.
Aflaq and Al-Bitar continued their partnership returning to Syria after their education in France was over.  At the time, Syria was a French colonial possession ceded by the Ottoman Empire after World War One.  Bitar and Aflaq were both school teachers using that medium to promote their philosophy.  By 1941 France was overrun and conquered by Nazi Germany and all of its territorial possessions now belonged to the Vichy French regime, whose actual sovereignty as a nation is questionable since Germany was really behind all its decisions.  It was at this time that the Al-Baath movement came into full force (the actual date is in question, some sources say 1940 while others say 1943).  Baathist saw themselves as allies of Nazi Germany in their quest to rid the Middle East of its European colonial status.  When Iraqis staged a military uprising against the British garrison in Baghdad, the founders of the Baathist movement organized and sponsored demonstrations in Damascus in support of the rebellion.
Germany received diplomatic envoys from various Pan-Arab revolutionaries across the Middle East requesting aid in their fight against colonialism and indeed Germany obliged. The Nazi Foreign Minister Ribbentrop was personally interested in grabbing land in Iraq and Syria.  There are two distinct reasons why Germany wanted to expand their sphere of influence in the region.  One was the more immediate and strategically significant factor of control of the vital oil lines, which the Allies had in their favor.  The other was much darker and sinister.  The German final solution required that a certain amount of land in Palestine should be set aside for the relocation and extermination of European Jews after the war were to have been won.  Many Arabs supported this idea since Zionism is seen as the enemy to the more fanatical. 
Baath is the Arabic word for “Resurrection” or “rebirth” and their official platform is freedom from colonial rule, Arab unity and Arab socialism.  Arab socialism could be defined as the redistribution of private property and wealth formally held by the colonial powers as well as nationalizing the means of production, but, only within the constraints of traditional Arab values of private property and inheritance.  On April 7th, 1947, one year after France left Syria, the Baath Arab Socialist Party was officially formed with the establishment of a constitution and a standing committee.  Regional headquarters were established all through the Middle East. In 1963, the BASP took control of the Syrian government in a bloodless coup de tat and have been in control ever since.   

 
   


Evidence against the claim:


    Given the date the BASP was officially founded in 1947 and the collapse of the German regime in 1945, one cannot be responsible for the others creation.  Any kind of power or influence Germany had in the region was utterly wiped out as consequence to its defeat in WW2.  Although sympathetic to the Nazi cause, there have not been any documented cases of Aflaq or Bitar meeting with any kind of German agent for the purposes of receiving aid.
Germany was sending aid to Syria, as well as other Arab satellites, but the money was being handled by the French Vichy, not the Arabs, and that all changed in 1941 when the allies defeated the Vichy.  Once the allies established military control of the area (by successfully defeating the Iraqi insurrection and the German Afika Korps in Egypt) Germany abandon its immediate hopes of conquest and worried more about the Soviet Red Army inching its way to Berlin slowly but surely.   The bottom line is that Nazi money was being sent into the Middle East not to inspire another arm of the Nazi party and gain an ally, but instead to undermine the British control of the region and to gain access to vital resources.
    Although Michel Aflaq’s Nazi sympathies are well documented, he was dedicated to starting the Baath movement by non-violent means.  He was a proponent of democratic rule by way of Arab Socialism.  The stated goal of the Baath party was not to emulate any world philosophies, but to promote an Arab political ideology free from any kind of foreign influence, whether it be Nazism, Marxism or Western capitalism.


“Freedom, Unity and Socialism”

-Baath Arab Socialist Party platform


Conclusions:

    National Socialism does not have the historical monopoly on fanatical governments.  That said, I have studied the evidence and I am led to believe that Nazi Germany is NOT responsible for the formation of the BASP.   Although the founders of the Baath party may have been inspired by the actions of Nazi Germany, it most certainly was not the first movement for a united Arab land. Although Nazism and the BASP do share some philosophical ties (one nation, one people) the root cause in Baathism is not anti-bolshevism or anti-Semitism, as is the Nazi doctrine, but freedom from colonial rule in a secular Arab society.
    I ask this question in order to justify my conclusion.  Did Germany give money to the Baath party before it was officially organized? No. Not specifically but Germany did send aid to other Arab nationalist groups. Did the BASP model itself from the National Socialist experience?  I believe it did, but I believe the BASP would have existed whether the Nazis took power or not.  Why did the BASP gain such a broad support base following WW2? Because the BASP was the only political group in the Middle East that appealed to the masses, that had a set and established ideology and at the same time seemed to be the only answer to combat the creation of the state of Israel, an issue that was at the top of Arab concern.

Sources:

http://www.iraqinews.com/party_baath_party.shtml

http://www.baath-party.org/

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Re … p?ID=16533

http://baath-party.biography.ms/

http://www.venusproject.com/ecs/aFarrokhArab.html

http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/fac … os/sy.html

http://www.eretzyisroel.org/~jkatz/baath.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baath_Part … 27th_Party




it got me an "A"

Discuss?

Last edited by GunSlinger OIF II (2006-07-17 11:37:32)

Anfidurl
Use the bumper, that's what its for!
+103|6834|Lexington, Kentucky
Hm. Interesting.
$teiner
Member
+8|6804|United Kingdom
It's what i've always said, even though people will refute the evidence thats right in front of them.

Good topic mate, i'm sure you'll get some interesting replies to this.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6797

$teiner wrote:

It's what i've always said, even though people will refute the evidence thats right in front of them.

Good topic mate, i'm sure you'll get some interesting replies to this.
It's actually the opposite of what you said (in the Heavy-Handedness thread). If you had even read the conclusion, let alone the passage itself, you'd realise that. LOL
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,979|6873|949

Good discussion.  I personally think the conclusions you made were for the most part right on.  The Baath party did not recieve direct aid from Nazi Germany, nor did it model itself on the policies of the Nazi party.  It simply took a like-minded political phlisophy (national socialism) and restructered it around the Arab culture.

Nazi Germany was known to support whatever it could to further its own stated goals, including financial aid to Arab countries to gain resources and ideological fans.  I have no doubt that had Nazi Germany won, they would have turned on their Arab beneficiaries as soon as the relationship no longer benefitted them.
Andy_McNab
Member
+2|6762
Why not do an investigation into how many democracies have been destroed and replaced by dictatorships by the West?  Off the top of my head I can think of two - The British in Iraq (Messapertania) and the US in Chille
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,979|6873|949

Andy_McNab wrote:

Why not do an investigation into how many democracies have been destroed and replaced by dictatorships by the West?  Off the top of my head I can think of two - The British in Iraq (Messapertania) and the US in Chille
It would take too long, there are too many, and the investigation would be incredibly time consuming.  That being said, go for it!

P.S. - Mesopotamia and Chile.
GunSlinger OIF II
Banned.
+1,860|6885

Andy_McNab wrote:

Why not do an investigation into how many democracies have been destroed and replaced by dictatorships by the West?  Off the top of my head I can think of two - The British in Iraq (Messapertania) and the US in Chille
because that has nothing to do with the original post...but, check above.


All this recent talk about nazi arabs.  Im talking about the origins of pan-arabism.  Although now adays it may be a different case considering how much certain members of middle eastern society hate Jews (yes, not zionism, JEWS) but I truly think those people represent the extreme fanatical.  For the most part, being a good muslim means tolerance. all that we see in the media are images of rage and hatred the same way they see the west as murderers and imperialist.  No matter what side of any conflict, a smal controlling group of people could always play on the fears of the masses.  Propaganda is propaganda.



Go Psy Ops!


wait wait wait, ill always be 11B

Last edited by GunSlinger OIF II (2006-07-17 14:08:52)

oug
Calmer than you are.
+380|6760|Πάϊ
This whole Nazi Arabs thing is clearly made up by Israel. Ever since the holocaust the Jews have been labeling anyone who opposes them as a Nazi. This makes it very difficult to take up a position against Israeli policies without being stigmatized as an unreliable hater of Jews.
ƒ³
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,979|6873|949

I disagree that the tag was created by Israel, although I do agree that Israelis play up the holocaust card.  Anyone with any sort of rationality knows there is a difference between anti-semitism and anti-zionism.

Pan-Arabism.  What an interesting word.  Jews have Zionism, and Arabs have Pan-Arabism.  What is the difference?  Do Arabs believe they have a religiously mandated right to the region?  Or is Pan-Arabism just a nationalistic idea to bolster pride and the Arab culture?
GunSlinger OIF II
Banned.
+1,860|6885
pan-arabism is more like the belief in a secular regional unity in the middle east amongs arabs.  its more of a cultural identity and it stemmed from the colonial period towards the late 19th and early 20th with the break up of the Ottoman "empire".  Because the reality is: Egyptians and Iraqis and Yemenis and Lebenese are all a different group of people who really have no business being lumped up in one category.  Its the secular version of what Osama wants or what the ayatollahs want.  The Baath party used this is their platform and even more so, they use pan-arabism to gain support from fellow arab nations during the Iran-Iraq war.
GunSlinger OIF II
Banned.
+1,860|6885

Viper38 wrote:

At what level of education did you submit this paper and for what subject?
Political Science 2 -Comparative government, Jr College
oug
Calmer than you are.
+380|6760|Πάϊ

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

Because the reality is: Egyptians and Iraqis and Yemenis and Lebanese are all a different group of people who really have no business being lumped up in one category.  Its the secular version of what Osama wants or what the ayatollahs want.  The Baath party used this is their platform and even more so, they use pan-arabism to gain support from fellow arab nations during the Iran-Iraq war.
In what sense are they different exactly? Why is it that these people need  boarders between them?

If you set aside any cultural diversity - which the ayatollahs may not be ready to accept - I fail to see a reason why a united Arab state could not exist.
Look at the US for example. So many cultures under one government and they seem to be doing fine. It all has to do with inspiring a sense of unity to the people. The US government has been doing that very effectively since day 1 and I think they have created a national awareness where there was none.
People whose grandparents were Dutch, German, English, French, Spanish, Chinese, Nigerian etc etc now call themselves American.

But Arab unity stumbles upon far greater foes than cultural diversity at the moment... Divide and rule...
ƒ³
oug
Calmer than you are.
+380|6760|Πάϊ

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

I disagree that the tag was created by Israel
I would like to hear your thoughts on who it was created from.

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

Anyone with any sort of rationality knows there is a difference between anti-semitism and anti-zionism.
Consider the Israeli Government and mister Sharon. If they are not Zionists I don't know who is.
ƒ³
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6770|Global Command
Yet another excellent thread from Slinga
GunSlinger OIF II
Banned.
+1,860|6885

oug wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

Because the reality is: Egyptians and Iraqis and Yemenis and Lebanese are all a different group of people who really have no business being lumped up in one category.  Its the secular version of what Osama wants or what the ayatollahs want.  The Baath party used this is their platform and even more so, they use pan-arabism to gain support from fellow arab nations during the Iran-Iraq war.
In what sense are they different exactly? Why is it that these people need  boarders between them?

If you set aside any cultural diversity - which the ayatollahs may not be ready to accept - I fail to see a reason why a united Arab state could not exist.
Look at the US for example. So many cultures under one government and they seem to be doing fine. It all has to do with inspiring a sense of unity to the people. The US government has been doing that very effectively since day 1 and I think they have created a national awareness where there was none.
People whose grandparents were Dutch, German, English, French, Spanish, Chinese, Nigerian etc etc now call themselves American.

But Arab unity stumbles upon far greater foes than cultural diversity at the moment... Divide and rule...
before the breakup of the ottoman empire, the lands in arabia were seperated by ethnic groups and tribes.  We see them as Iraqi, Yemeni or whatever thanks to the partition of the middle from the fall of the ottoman empire in 1922.  Lines that were drawn, for the most part, by the brits and frenchies.  there are 17 or 18 different dialiects of arabic.  Gulf Arabic, Iraqi Arabic, Lebanese Arabic, Coloquial (egyptian) and modern standard arabic just to name a few.  centuries, none of them were united, they were all seperate tribes and factions warring with eachother.  Not since the caliphate has Arabia been united under one banner.
Cactusfist
Pusher of sausages Down Hallways
+26|6809
National Sotialism the phrase is a contradicion.

I never understood that....
oug
Calmer than you are.
+380|6760|Πάϊ

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

before the breakup of the ottoman empire, the lands in arabia were seperated by ethnic groups and tribes.  We see them as Iraqi, Yemeni or whatever thanks to the partition of the middle from the fall of the ottoman empire in 1922.  Lines that were drawn, for the most part, by the brits and frenchies.  there are 17 or 18 different dialiects of arabic.  Gulf Arabic, Iraqi Arabic, Lebanese Arabic, Coloquial (egyptian) and modern standard arabic just to name a few.  centuries, none of them were united, they were all seperate tribes and factions warring with eachother.  Not since the caliphate has Arabia been united under one banner.
Agreed. The Arab tribes have been fighting amongst each other seems like for ever. If it hadn't been for Israel acting as a common enemy I think those differences would have been much more obvious to the outside world.
But you said so yourself, today's lines were drawn by the Brits & the French. If they were to be overcome I believe we could see a united - but nonetheless troubled - arab state.
ƒ³
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,979|6873|949

I don't know who was the first to compare Arabs to Nazi's, and to be honest, it doesn't really matter to me.  I do agree that Israel and some Jews in general play into that notion, that Arabs are Nazis, or look up to Nazis, or model their social outlook on Nazis.  Yes, Sharon is a Zionist, and some people in the Israeli government are zionists as well.  Some in the Israeli government are realists as well, understanding that it takes a cooperative effort to end the violence in the region.

I don't think a united Arab state is what Arabs want.  Like Gunslinger said, there are too many distinct ideas and societies in the region to unite.  You have theocracies, constitutional monarchies, republics, and others all playing off of each other.  For some Arab countries in the region, their form of government works for them.  Look at Kuwait; while not a shining example of democracy, they manage to have a relatively high standard of living.  Same with the UAE or even Jordan.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard